agentleFS
tuisttuist/agent-plugin/skills/compare-builds/SKILL.md

compare-builds

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Compares two Xcode build runs to identify duration regressions, cache changes, and new issues. Can be invoked with build IDs, dashboard URLs, or branch names (e.g. `tuist compare-builds --base main --head feature-branch`).

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 0 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run tuist build list --json to find builds on each branch.

    line 12
  2. Very specific:

    Run tuist build show <build-id> --json for both base and head builds.

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    If only one identifier is provided, use the project's default branch as the baseline.

    line 18
  4. Distinctive:

    If no base is provided, use the project's default branch (usually main).

    line 44
  5. Distinctive:

    If no head is provided, detect the current git branch with git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD.

    line 45
  6. Very specific:

    After fetching both builds with tuist build show <id> --json, drill down into sub-resources for a deeper comparison.

    line 49
  7. Distinctive:

    Look for targets that changed status (e.g., success to failure) or had significant duration changes.

    line 58
  8. Distinctive:

    Look for new warnings or errors introduced in the head build.

    line 67
  9. Distinctive:

    After fetching both builds, compare:

    line 80
  10. Distinctive:

    If the head build is significantly slower:

    line 97
  11. Very specific:

    Check if the category differs (clean vs incremental builds are not directly comparable).

    line 99
  12. Distinctive:

    Check if cache hit rate dropped, which would explain longer builds.

    line 100
  13. Distinctive:

    If both are incremental with similar cache rates, the regression is likely in compilation time.

    line 101

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Compare Builds

Quick Start

You'll typically receive two build identifiers (IDs, dashboard URLs, or branch names). Follow these steps:

  1. Run tuist build list --json to find builds on each branch.
  2. Run tuist build show <build-id> --json for both base and head builds.
  3. Fetch sub-resource details: targets (tuist build xcode target list <id> --json), issues (tuist build xcode issue list <id> --json), and cache tasks (tuist build xcode cache-task list <id> --json).
  4. Compare duration, status, cache hit rates, and other metrics.
  5. Summarize regressions, improvements, and recommendations.

If only one identifier is provided, use the project's default branch as the baseline.

Step 1: Resolve Builds

If base/head are build IDs or dashboard URLs

Fetch each directly:

tuist build show <base-id> --json
tuist build show <head-id> --json

If base/head are branch names

List recent builds on each branch and pick the latest:

tuist build list --git-branch <base-branch> --json --page-size 1
tuist build list --git-branch <head-branch> --json --page-size 1

Then fetch full details with tuist build show <id> --json.

Defaults

  • If no base is provided, use the project's default branch (usually main).
  • If no head is provided, detect the current git branch with git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD.

Step 2: Fetch Sub-Resource Details

After fetching both builds with tuist build show <id> --json, drill down into sub-resources for a deeper comparison.

Compare targets

tuist build xcode target list <base-id> --json
tuist build xcode target list <head-id> --json

Look for targets that changed status (e.g., success to failure) or had significant duration changes.

Compare issues

tuist build xcode issue list <base-id> --json
tuist build xcode issue list <head-id> --json

Look for new warnings or errors introduced in the head build.

Compare cache tasks

tuist build xcode cache-task list <base-id> --json
tuist build xcode cache-task list <head-id> --json

Identify which specific targets had cache misses or hits and whether that changed between builds.

Step 3: Compare Top-Level Metrics

After fetching both builds, compare:

MetricWhat to check
durationFlag if head is >10% slower than base
statusFlag if base succeeded but head failed
cacheable_tasks_countNote if task count changed
cacheable_task_local_hits_countCompare local hit counts
cacheable_task_remote_hits_countCompare remote hit counts
Cache hit rate(local_hits + remote_hits) / cacheable_tasks_count * 100
categoryNote if one is clean and the other incremental (makes duration comparison less meaningful)
scheme / configurationEnsure both builds used the same scheme and configuration for a fair comparison

Compute the cache miss delta: base_misses - head_misses. Positive means head has fewer misses (improvement). Negative means regression.

Step 4: Investigate Duration Regressions

If the head build is significantly slower:

  1. Check if the category differs (clean vs incremental builds are not directly comparable).
  2. Check if cache hit rate dropped, which would explain longer builds.
  3. If both are incremental with similar cache rates, the regression is likely in compilation time.

Step 5: Investigate Cache Changes

Compare cache statistics:

  • Hit rate dropped: Possible causes include dependency changes, build setting changes, or Xcode version updates.
  • Hit rate improved: Likely due to better cache warming or fewer source changes.
  • Task count changed: New targets added or removed.

Step 6: Check Build Context

Compare environment details:

  • xcode_version and macos_version: Different versions can affect build times and cache validity.
  • is_ci: CI vs local builds may have different performance characteristics.
  • git_branch and git_commit_sha: Verify the builds are from the expected commits.

Summary Format

Produce a summary with:

  1. Overall verdict: Better, worse, or neutral compared to base.
  2. Duration: Absolute and percentage change.
  3. Cache hit rate: Change in hit rate with explanation.
  4. Status: Any status changes (pass to fail or vice versa).
  5. Environment: Note any environment differences that affect comparability.
  6. Recommendations: Actionable next steps based on findings.

Example:

Build Comparison: base (abc123 on main) vs head (def456 on feature-x)

Duration: 45.2s -> 62.8s (+39%) -- REGRESSION
Cache hit rate: 85% -> 72% (-13%) -- 8 new cache misses
Status: success -> success

Root cause: Cache hit rate dropped due to 8 targets with invalidated caches.
The dependency hash changed for FeatureModule, cascading to 7 downstream targets.

Recommendations:
- Investigate why FeatureModule's cache was invalidated
- Consider splitting large targets to reduce cascade impact

Done Checklist

  • Resolved both base and head builds
  • Fetched sub-resource details (targets, issues, cache tasks)
  • Compared duration, cache, and status metrics
  • Identified root causes for any regressions
  • Provided actionable recommendations

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.