self-evolving-skills
Skill5 starsChanged 35 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when adding new skills to the library, when extracting insights from completed experiments, when consolidating lessons learned, or when running a project retrospective. Triggers after a successful Kaggle competition, after major model breakthrough, or when "we should remember this" comes up.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- tunsuy/ai-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 14, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- tunsuy/ai-skills★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository63 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- adversarial-validation-kaggleSkill
- agent-nurture-frameworkSkill
- agent-session-memory-protocolSkill
- arxiv-paper-searchSkill
- autogluon-firstSkill
- autogluon-preset-strategySkill
- autogluon-timeseries-strategySkill
- catboost-first-tabularSkill
- claudeceptionSkill
- code-competition-artifact-pipelineSkill
- competition-orchestration-multimodelSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- controlled-submission-experimentSkill
- cross-competition-feature-transferSkill
- cv-lb-gap-acknowledgmentSkill
- domain-knowledge-constraints-trapSkill
- ensemble-model-correlation-trapSkill
- feature-engineering-saturation-detectionSkill
- gpu-readiness-assessmentSkill
- gsd-loop-engineeringSkill
- kaggle-cognitive-cost-optimizationSkill
- kaggle-competition-best-practicesSkill
- kaggle-competition-type-strategySkill
- kaggle-data-format-firstSkill
- kaggle-discussion-searchSkill
- kaggle-experiment-sopSkill
- kaggle-oof-lb-validation-protocolSkill
- kaggle-optimal-blendingSkill
- kaggle-submission-format-by-metricSkill
- kaggle-top-performer-replicationSkill
- knowledge-crystallization-feedback-loopSkill
- ladder-drift-and-meta-aware-regressionSkill
- learned-value-beats-heuristic-augmentationSkill
- llm-competition-pipelineSkill
- mcts-pipeline-searchSkill
- mem0-dynamic-graph-memorySkill
- memory-hierarchy-managementSkill
- ml-sweet-spot-principleSkill
- model-ensemble-negative-weight-effectSkill
- multi-agent-rolesSkill
- multi-level-aggregation-overfittingSkill
- okf-visualize-knowledgeSkill
- onnx-minimal-network-designSkill
- per-category-modeling-backfireSkill
- progressive-verification-debuggingSkill
- ptcg-2ply-bounded-searchSkill
- ptcg-bc-large-model-submissionSkill
- retail-eda-frameworkSkill
- rmsle-zero-threshold-asymmetrySkill
- runtime-reflexionSkill
- sc-tir-mathematical-reasoningSkill
- skill-governance-and-automationSkill
- spatiotemporal-graph-feature-engineeringSkill
- store-sales-darts-chronos-blendSkill
- tabular-polynomial-features-breakthroughSkill
- three-layer-wisdom-extractionSkill
- time-series-walk-forward-validationSkill
- trueskill-simulation-competition-strategySkill
- ts-day-specific-forecastingSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 88
After successful Kaggle competition
- Distinctive: line 91
When "we learned X" emerges repeatedly
- Distinctive: line 96
When existing skills cover the lesson
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Self-Evolving Skills (Voyager-Style)
Context
Static skill libraries grow only when humans add entries. Voyager (Wang et al. NeurIPS 2023) showed agents that auto-extract and register new skills grow 100+ skills without manual work. agy verified this as P1 for ML agents: 43+ skills → 100+ with quality gates.
The core insight: every experiment is a candidate skill; quality gating prevents library pollution.
Guidance
Extract from Text/Conversation
from framework.src.skill_evolution import SkillExtractor
ext = SkillExtractor()
candidates = ext.extract_from_text("""
We should always check data leakage before training.
Never use future information in features.
Make sure to use walk-forward validation for time series.
""")
# → 3 candidates: 1 skill, 1 anti-pattern, 1 principleExtract from Experiment Log
# 假设实验记录在 EXPERIMENTS.md
candidates = ext.extract_from_experiments_md(experiments_md_content)
# 自动按 importance 排序, top 20 入选Validate Before Registration
from framework.src.skill_evolution import SkillValidator
val = SkillValidator()
for c in candidates:
result = val.validate(c, existing_descriptions=existing)
# verdict: APPROVE / REVISE / REJECT
# issues: ['Too similar...', 'Missing frontmatter...']
# similarity_to_existing: 0.0 - 1.0Register to MCP Library
from framework.src.skill_evolution import SkillRegistry
registry = SkillRegistry(skills_dir="skills/examples")
for c in candidates:
result = registry.register(c)
if result.verdict.value == "approve":
print(f"Registered: {c.name}")
# 写入 skills/examples/{name}/SKILL.mdAuto-Approve (Production Danger)
# 生产环境慎用 — 应该人工 review
registry.register(candidate, auto_approve=True)Why This Matters
Without self-evolving:
- Skills grow slowly (43+ → manual additions)
- Lessons forgotten after session ends
- Same mistakes repeated
With self-evolving:
- 100+ skills in 6 months vs 5
- Lessons persist with proper templates
- Quality gates prevent bloat
agy: "Self-Evolving Skills is mid-high ROI; agents automatically grow from 43+ to 100+."
When to Apply
When to Use
- After successful Kaggle competition
- End of major experiment (consolidate learnings)
- Project retrospective
- When "we learned X" emerges repeatedly
When NOT to Use
- One-off observations (not worth a skill)
- Without Validator (always validate)
- When existing skills cover the lesson
Notes
- Always validate first: quality > quantity; bad skills hurt recall
- Similarity >0.85 = duplicate: reject or revise
- Description must start with "Use when...": ensures triggering
- Importance ≥0.7: auto-archive to vault
- Tags matter: helps recall filtering
- See also:
memory-hierarchy-management(where new skills land)
References
- Implementation:
framework/src/skill_evolution/ - Inspired by: Voyager (Wang et al. NeurIPS 2023), AIDE auto-skill-gen
- Quality gating: validator checks template + similarity + length
- Pairing skill:
claudeception(already exists, similar pattern)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

