landing-report
Skill8 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Read-only snapshot of the VERSION slots open PRs claim on the base branch and the slot /ship would pick next.
16 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- trungtm78/ClaudeSkillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- ignavm1/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- leishifu666/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- IyedBecheikh/bstacktheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- garrytan/gstackedited, first seen Oct 7, 2026
- Nankov-ai/anthropics-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 11, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ios-sync, ios-clean and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Saqlain-811Skillios-sync
Regenerate the iOS debug bridge against the latest upstream gstack templates. (gstack)
Also in 6 projects that use this
Saqlain-811Skillios-clean
Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)
Also in 5 projects that use this
bastosSkillios-design-review
Review iOS app UI/UX design quality using Apple's design principles and the Liquid Glass-era design language from WWDC25/26. Use when asked for a design review, UX critique, visual design assessment, or evaluation of an app's interface quality, design intent, alignment with the new Apple design system, or usability. Triggers: "design review", "UX review", "visual design critique", "review the UI", "does this design work", "evaluate this interface", "design feedback", "Liquid Glass review".
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +2 more from Saqlain-811
Other versions16 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- garrytan/gstack★ 141k18% same
Wrote their own version · 15
- chloropine/cgstack★ 1same name
- IyedBecheikh/bstack★ 1same name
- jpoindexter/theft-kit★ 1same name
- leishifu666/skills★ 1same name
- mahiunfiltered/claude-code-skills★ 1same name
- nileshteji/skills★ 1same name
- Biznomad/claude-skills★ 0same name
- greenharborlabs/claude-skills★ 0same name
- ignavm1/claude-skills★ 0same name
- Nankov-ai/anthropics-skills★ 0same name
5 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository62 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- address-pr-reviewSkill
- agent-evalSkill
- ai-cost-guardSkill
- autoplanSkill
- aws-costSkill
- bedrock-guardrailsSkill
- benchmarkSkill
- browseSkill
- canarySkill
- carefulSkill
- claudeSkill
- codexSkill
- connect-chromeSkill
- connect-reviewSkill
- context-restoreSkill
- context-saveSkill
- csoSkill
- design-consultationSkill
- design-htmlSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-shotgunSkill
- devex-reviewSkill
- diagramSkill
- document-generateSkill
- document-releaseSkill
- freezeSkill
- guardSkill
- healthSkill
- iac-reviewSkill
- improve-archSkill
- investigateSkill
- kb-reviewSkill
- land-and-deploySkill
- learnSkill
- make-pdfSkill
- mcp-reviewSkill
- office-hoursSkill
- open-browserSkill
- pair-agentSkill
- plan-ceo-reviewSkill
- plan-design-reviewSkill
- plan-devex-reviewSkill
- plan-eng-reviewSkill
- plan-tuneSkill
- pr-summarySkill
- qa-onlySkill
- qaSkill
- retroSkill
- reviewSkill
- scrapeSkill
- setup-browser-cookiesSkill
- setup-deploySkill
- shipSkill
- skillifySkill
- specSkill
- telegramSkill
- unfreezeSkill
- unslopSkill
- vibe-gcSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
If this session was compacted, the copy of this skill in context may be cut off.
- Very specific: line 17
Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/SKILL.md from disk and resume at the step you are on.
- Distinctive: line 21
Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next".
- Very specific: line 47
When you're running several branches in parallel, it helps to see — at a glance — which version numbers are claimed, by which PR, and what …
- Very specific: line 89
Call the util once per bump level so the user sees what they'd claim for patch/minor/major.
- Very specific: line 111
Read <LANDING_DIR>/patch.json, <LANDING_DIR>/minor.json and <LANDING_DIR>/major.json, replacing <LANDING_DIR> with the path Step 3 printed …
- Very specific: line 160
When .complete is false, the Status line reads ONLINE — queue may be incomplete and Step 5 gives suggestion 2: a slot that looks free may …
- Distinctive: line 184
After rendering the table, suggest ONE of:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
If this session was compacted, the copy of this skill in context may be cut off.
Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/SKILL.md from disk and resume at the step you are on.
When to invoke
Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next".
Preamble
eval "$("${VIBESTACK_HOME:-$HOME/.vibestack}/bin/vibe-slug" 2>/dev/null)" 2>/dev/null || SLUG="unknown"
_LEARN_FILE="${VIBESTACK_HOME:-$HOME/.vibestack}/projects/${SLUG:-unknown}/learnings.jsonl"
if [ -f "$_LEARN_FILE" ]; then
_LEARN_COUNT=$(wc -l < "$_LEARN_FILE" 2>/dev/null | tr -d ' ')
echo "LEARNINGS: $_LEARN_COUNT entries loaded"
if [ "$_LEARN_COUNT" -gt 5 ] 2>/dev/null; then
"${VIBESTACK_HOME:-$HOME/.vibestack}/bin/vibe-learnings-search" --limit 5 2>/dev/null || true
fi
else
echo "LEARNINGS: none yet"
fi{{include lib/snippets/session-host.md}}
{{include lib/snippets/working-protocols.md}}
{{include lib/snippets/state-protocols.md}}
Why this skill exists
When you're running several branches in parallel, it helps to see — at a
glance — which version numbers are claimed, by which PR, and what slot your next
/ship would land in. This skill is a read-only call into the same
"${VIBESTACK_HOME:-$HOME/.vibestack}/bin/vibe-next-version" utility /ship uses, but with nothing mutating.
Think of it as gh pr list for VERSION numbers.
Step 1: Detect platform and base branch
Same detection as other vibestack skills.
BASE_BRANCH=$(gh pr view --json baseRefName -q .baseRefName 2>/dev/null || \
gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef -q .defaultBranchRef.name 2>/dev/null || \
echo main)
echo "BASE_BRANCH: $BASE_BRANCH"Each block runs in a fresh shell. Later blocks start with BASE_BRANCH='<BASE_BRANCH>'
and BASE_VERSION='<BASE_VERSION>': replace each placeholder with the value printed
under that label.
Step 2: Read current state
BASE_BRANCH='<BASE_BRANCH>'
CURRENT_VERSION=$(tr -d '[:space:]' 2>/dev/null < VERSION)
[ -n "$CURRENT_VERSION" ] || CURRENT_VERSION=0.0.0
git fetch origin "$BASE_BRANCH" --quiet 2>/dev/null || true
BASE_VERSION=$(git show "origin/$BASE_BRANCH:VERSION" 2>/dev/null | tr -d '[:space:]')
[ -n "$BASE_VERSION" ] || BASE_VERSION=$CURRENT_VERSION
echo "BASE_VERSION: $BASE_VERSION"
echo "branch HEAD VERSION: $CURRENT_VERSION"Step 3: Query the queue
Call the util once per bump level so the user sees what they'd claim for
patch/minor/major. Versions are MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH; there is no separate micro
level (the util treats micro as patch).
BASE_BRANCH='<BASE_BRANCH>'
BASE_VERSION='<BASE_VERSION>'
LANDING_DIR=$(mktemp -d "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/landing-XXXXXX")
echo "LANDING_DIR: $LANDING_DIR"
for LEVEL in patch minor major; do
"${VIBESTACK_HOME:-$HOME/.vibestack}/bin/vibe-next-version" \
--base "$BASE_BRANCH" \
--bump "$LEVEL" \
--current-version "$BASE_VERSION" \
> "$LANDING_DIR/$LEVEL.json" 2>/dev/null || echo '{"offline":true,"complete":false,"reason":"vibe-next-version failed","claimed":[],"warnings":[]}' > "$LANDING_DIR/$LEVEL.json"
doneStep 4: Render the dashboard
Read <LANDING_DIR>/patch.json, <LANDING_DIR>/minor.json and
<LANDING_DIR>/major.json, replacing <LANDING_DIR> with the path Step 3 printed
on the LANDING_DIR: line. Build a single table output. Use the patch-level JSON
as canonical for the queue (it is identical across bump levels; only .version
differs).
vibe-next-version emits exactly these fields — render only what they contain:
.host—github|gitlab|unknown.base— the base branch the queue was filtered to.offline—truewhen no PR host was reachable.reason— one-line explanation of the pick (or of the offline fallback).claimed— array of{pr, branch, version, url}: open PRs against.basewhose headVERSIONis ahead of the base version. Read from each PR's headVERSIONfile, not its title..warnings— PRs whose headVERSIONcould not be read or is malformed.complete—trueonly when every open PR'sVERSIONwas read;falsewhen the PR list was truncated or any read failed.version— the slot/shipwould claim at this bump level
Sibling worktree detection is not supported: .active_siblings is always an
empty list. Do not render a sibling section, and do not infer siblings from
git worktree list or anywhere else. A PR number, branch or version that is
not in .claimed does not exist — never fill a row in from memory or a guess.
Render in this exact format:
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ VIBESTACK LANDING REPORT ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Repo: <owner/repo> ║
║ Base: <.base> @ v<base-version> ║
║ Host: <.host> ║
║ Status: ONLINE (or: ONLINE — queue may be incomplete) ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Open PRs claiming versions on <.base>:
#<pr> <branch> → v<version>
#<pr> <branch> → v<version> ⚠ collision with #<pr>
Warnings:
<one line per entry in .warnings; omit the section when empty>
If you ran /ship right now, you'd claim:
patch bump: v<patch .version> (<patch .reason>)
minor bump: v<minor .version> (<minor .reason>)
major bump: v<major .version> (<major .reason>)When .complete is false, the Status line reads ONLINE — queue may be incomplete and
Step 5 gives suggestion 2: a slot that looks free may already be claimed by a PR the read
missed. When .complete is true, the output is unchanged.
A collision is two entries in .claimed with the same version. When
.claimed is empty, print Open PRs claiming versions on <.base>: none.
For offline output (.offline is true), print a shorter block:
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ VIBESTACK LANDING REPORT ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Status: OFFLINE — queue-awareness unavailable ║
║ Reason: <.reason> ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Fallback: local VERSION bumps still work, but collisions cannot be detected.Step 5: Suggest next action
After rendering the table, suggest ONE of:
- If there are collisions in the queue (two open PRs claim the same version):
"⚠ Two open PRs collide on v
<X>. Whoever merges second will either overwrite the first's CHANGELOG entry or land a duplicate. Consider asking one author to rerun /ship to pick up the next free slot." - If
.warningsis non-empty or.completeisfalse: "Some open PRs' VERSION could not be read (listed above), so the queue may be incomplete. Check those PRs before trusting the next slot." - If everything looks clean: "Queue is clean. Next /ship will claim a slot without conflict."
Plan Mode
PLAN MODE EXCEPTION — ALWAYS RUN. This skill is entirely read-only: no file writes, no git mutations, no network state changes. Safe to run in plan mode.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

