lean-code
Skill2 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when simplifying an implementation, consolidating duplication, or replacing an internal interface while preserving required behavior.
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- linsaftw/lean-agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-configtheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
- Lean-LLM/lean-agentstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- malkiii/lean-code-skilltheir own version, first seen Oct 24, 2026
- sammasak/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- sammasak/claude-code-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- AnastasiyaW/claude-code-config★ 214same name
- AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config★ 214same name
- Lean-LLM/lean-agents★ 30same name
- linsaftw/lean-agents★ 30same name
- definite-d/agent-skills★ 2same name
- malkiii/lean-code-skill★ 1same name
- sammasak/claude-code-skills★ 1same name
- sammasak/skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- capability-incident-diagnoserSkill
- context-managementSkill
- goal-workflowSkill
- host-cli-usageSkill
- tool-useSkill
- fast-checksSkill
- filesystem-wizardSkill
- test-freshnessSkill
- security-boundary-reviewSkill
- portable-shellSkill
- process-debuggingSkill
- brokered-git-operatorSkill
- finalize-loopSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
Verify observable behavior, error paths, and a migrated caller using the owning checks.
- Distinctive: line 28
Stop when the requested simplification is checked or no worthwhile change remains, within the agreed budget.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Simplify the responsibility
Choose a concrete reduction in maintenance cost: remove a dead path, unnecessary wrapper, repeated work, or dependency. Preserve behavior, failure paths, ownership, and dependency direction. Fewer lines alone are not an improvement.
Extract duplication only when callers share a stable responsibility. Prefer existing primitives to speculative abstractions; do not trade readable code for compressed syntax or hidden complexity.
For an internal interface replacement, migrate known callers, tests, and affected documentation together, then remove superseded code. Keep a compatibility path only for an identified unmigrated consumer, with a reason and removal condition. External interfaces and persisted data need an explicit migration strategy.
Verify observable behavior, error paths, and a migrated caller using the owning checks. Distinguish baseline failures from regressions. Do not weaken validation or assertions to make the smaller implementation pass. Measure performance claims; label unmeasured benefits as expectations.
Stop when the requested simplification is checked or no worthwhile change remains, within the agreed budget. Do not invent an iteration quota. Repair only your own unsuccessful edits and preserve unrelated work. Refactoring does not authorize data destruction, deployment, or host activation.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

