agentleFS
timfewitimfewi/unix-agent-skills/skills/code/lean-code/SKILL.md

lean-code

Skill2 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when simplifying an implementation, consolidating duplication, or replacing an internal interface while preserving required behavior.

8 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Verify observable behavior, error paths, and a migrated caller using the owning checks.

    line 23
  2. Distinctive:

    Stop when the requested simplification is checked or no worthwhile change remains, within the agreed budget.

    line 28

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Simplify the responsibility

Choose a concrete reduction in maintenance cost: remove a dead path, unnecessary wrapper, repeated work, or dependency. Preserve behavior, failure paths, ownership, and dependency direction. Fewer lines alone are not an improvement.

Extract duplication only when callers share a stable responsibility. Prefer existing primitives to speculative abstractions; do not trade readable code for compressed syntax or hidden complexity.

For an internal interface replacement, migrate known callers, tests, and affected documentation together, then remove superseded code. Keep a compatibility path only for an identified unmigrated consumer, with a reason and removal condition. External interfaces and persisted data need an explicit migration strategy.

Verify observable behavior, error paths, and a migrated caller using the owning checks. Distinguish baseline failures from regressions. Do not weaken validation or assertions to make the smaller implementation pass. Measure performance claims; label unmeasured benefits as expectations.

Stop when the requested simplification is checked or no worthwhile change remains, within the agreed budget. Do not invent an iteration quota. Repair only your own unsuccessful edits and preserve unrelated work. Refactoring does not authorize data destruction, deployment, or host activation.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.