agentleFS
thejefflarsonthejefflarson/soundcheck/.claude/skills/injection/SKILL.md

injection

Skill20 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Detects SQL, command, and template injection caused by user input reaching an

  • Deletes or force-pushes

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    SQL: use parameterized queries or an ORM — never concatenate user input into query strings

    line 30
  2. Distinctive:

    eval/exec: remove entirely — there is no safe way to evaluate user-supplied code strings

    line 33

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Injection Security Check (A05:2025)

What this checks

Protects against SQL, command, and template injection caused by passing user-controlled data to an interpreter without sanitization. Exploitation leads to full database read/write, remote code execution, and data exfiltration. For NoSQL-specific injection (MongoDB operator injection, $where), see nosql-injection.

Vulnerable patterns

  • "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = " + userId — user input concatenated into SQL
  • exec("convert " + filename) — shell expansion allows ; rm -rf /
  • eval(userInput) — arbitrary code execution from user-supplied string
  • Template("Hello " + name) — template body built from user input

Fix immediately

For each vulnerable call site, apply the appropriate control:

  • SQL: use parameterized queries or an ORM — never concatenate user input into query strings
  • Shell: pass arguments as an array/list, never as an interpolated string — disable shell expansion
  • Templates: use an engine that autoescapes by default and pass user values through the parameter interface. Python: Environment(autoescape=True) (bool literal, not select_autoescape() with from_string()). Go: html/template, never text/template for HTTP output. Java FreeMarker: cfg.setOutputFormat(HTMLOutputFormat.INSTANCE). Rust: handlebars (escapes by default). Never build the template body from user input.
  • eval/exec: remove entirely — there is no safe way to evaluate user-supplied code strings

Flag the vulnerable call site, explain the risk and the correct fix pattern, then continue with the original task.

Verification

Confirm the following properties hold (language-agnostic):

  • User-controlled values reach SQL only as bound parameters — never via string interpolation, concatenation, or format strings
  • User-controlled values reach subprocess execution only as discrete argument list elements — never via a shell string or interpolated command string
  • No dynamic evaluation of user-supplied strings as code (Python eval/exec, JS eval/new Function, etc. removed — not replaced with a safer-looking variant of the same function)
  • Templates use an engine where HTML autoescaping is either enabled explicitly or is the documented default (Flask render_template, Go html/template, Rust handlebars, Jinja2 Environment(autoescape=True) — NOT Jinja2 Template() direct, NOT Go text/template), and user values are passed through the engine's parameter interface — never by building the template body from user input

References

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.