qv-addon-pr-create
Skill697 starsChanged 18 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Generate PR descriptions for addon packages (non-SDK inference addons, decoder, OCR). Use when creating a PR description or user asks to "prepare PR description" for an addon package.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 29
If the version in package.json is unchanged compared to main, display this exact warning to the user:
- Distinctive: line 34
If this PR includes any changes that must be released in the package, you must bump the package version, commit/push it and re-run this …
- Distinctive: line 39
Do not include uncommitted changes or untracked files: If any uncommitted/untracked files are present, or if there are local-only commits, …
- Very specific: line 40
If there's a release notes file in release-notes/ that matches the new version in package.json, read it for additional context.
- Very specific: line 46
Use .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/addon.md as the template.
- Distinctive: line 50
Do NOT create or modify any additional files when producing the PR description.
- Very specific: line 52
Do not add packages/cli to a native addon PR.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Addon PR Description Generator
What
Generate PR descriptions for addon packages (non-SDK packages like inference addons, decoder, OCR). Collects changes from the remote tracked branch, validates the version bump, and fills in the PR template.
When to Use
- Creating a PR description for an addon package
- User explicitly asks to "generate a PR description" or "prepare PR description" while working in an addon package
Instructions
Step 1: Identify base/head, collect changes, and verify version bump
Identify the PR base/head, collect the full change set from the remote tracked branch, and validate the version bump in package.json against main:
- Find the PR base and head: The base is
main(or the branch configured as default). The head is the current branch. - Collect changes from the remote tracked branch:
- Compare
main...origin/<current-branch>(or the PR base commit...origin/<current-branch>) to list commits and diffs. - The rule: only the remote tracked branch is considered.
- Compare
Mandatory version bump check:
- Always compare
package.jsonbetweenmainandorigin/<current-branch>. - If the
versioninpackage.jsonis unchanged compared tomain, display this exact warning to the user:
WARNING: VERSION BUMP MAY BE REQUIRED The
versioninpackage.jsonis unchanged compared tomain. If this PR includes any changes that must be released in the package, you must bump the package version, commit/push it and re-run this command.- Still proceed with the next steps
- Always compare
- Do not include uncommitted changes or untracked files: If any uncommitted/untracked files are present, or if there are local-only commits, ignore them.
- If there's a release notes file in
release-notes/that matches the new version inpackage.json, read it for additional context. If it's missing, warn the user.
The goal is a single combined change set: all commits on the remote tracked branch vs main, while ensuring no unwanted changes end up in the PR description.
Step 2: Generate the PR description
Use .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/addon.md as the template. If there are additional instructions in the template file, follow them too.
Fill in the template based on the combined change set. Return the completed PR description to the user as a message.
Do NOT create or modify any additional files when producing the PR description.
Do not add packages/cli to a native addon PR. If a follow-up SDK exposure PR is expected, remind the author that CLI belongs there (see packages/sdk/AGENTS.md).
In this repository56 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/agent-integrations.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/cpp/string-api-conventions.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/devops/main.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/no-remote-code-execution.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/qip-triage.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sdk/commit-and-pr-format.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sdk/error-handling.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sdk/first-class-product-parity.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sdk/main.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sdk/public-constants-contract.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sdk/request-lifecycle-primitives.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sdk/sdk-pod-packages.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sdk/skill-authoring-guidelines.mdcCursor rule
- cpp-string-api-reviewSkill
- qv-addon-changelogSkill
- qv-addon-release-notesSkill
- qv-agent-stack-syncSkill
- qv-asana-syncSkill
- qv-daily-work-updateSkill
- qv-dev-diary-setupSkill
- qv-dev-diarySkill
- qv-devops-daily-updateSkill
- qv-devops-pr-createSkill
- qv-devops-pr-reviewSkill
- qv-devops-pr-statusSkill
- qv-devops-runner-queueSkill
- qv-devops-why-my-pr-notSkill
- qv-docs-solution-createSkill
- qv-docs-updateSkill
- qv-holepunch-devSkill
- qv-merge-guard-wireSkill
- qv-mobile-test-dispatchSkill
- qv-notice-generateSkill
- qv-pr-mineSkill
- qv-pr-reviewSkill
- qv-pr-testSkill
- qv-qip-createSkill
- qv-qip-reviewSkill
- qv-qip-triageSkill
- qv-quality-reportingSkill
- qv-registry-autobase-patternsSkill
- qv-release-trainSkill
- qv-sdk-backmergeSkill
- qv-sdk-changelogSkill
- qv-sdk-e2e-createSkill
- qv-sdk-inference-versionSkill
- qv-sdk-pr-createSkill
- qv-sdk-pr-statusSkill
- qv-sdk-update-modelsSkill
- qv-skill-listSkill
- setupSkill
- setupSkill
- qv-nx-ciSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

