startup-roadmap
Skill0 starsChanged 2 days agoMITView on GitHub
Diagnose where a startup or side project stands (idea, problem validated, solution validated, MVP, launch, growth), name its riskiest assumption, and turn it into a 30-day plan with weekly goals and the right garage skill for each step. Use when a founder asks where to start or what to do next, or shares an idea, a project or a business plan. Triggers: "startup idea", "I want to start a business", "where do I start", "next steps", "créer mon entreprise", "lancer ma startup", "par où commencer", "prochaines étapes", "emprender", "crear mi empresa", "por dónde empiezo", "próximos pasos".
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- brand-identitySkill
- competitor-teardownSkill
- customer-interviewsSkill
- desk-researchSkill
- financial-forecastSkill
- first-customersSkill
- funding-optionsSkill
- idea-validationSkill
- landing-pageSkill
- legal-setupSkill
- mvp-scopingSkill
- pitch-deckSkill
- prototype-testingSkill
- support-programsSkill
- survey-designSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
Every few weeks, to check whether the project has reached the next stage.
- Very specific: line 22
Not for a full strategy case or a business plan: use the boardroom skills (business-analysis, market-sizing, unit-economics) if they are …
- Distinctive: line 77
Every weekly goal is measurable and fits the founder's real time.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Startup roadmap
Founders rarely lack ideas or tasks. What they lack is a clear view of which question to answer first. This skill finds the current stage of the project, names its biggest risk, and builds a short plan that tests it.
When to use
- At the start of a conversation about a new project, or when the founder feels lost.
- Every few weeks, to check whether the project has reached the next stage.
- Not for a full strategy case or a business plan: use the
boardroomskills (business-analysis,market-sizing,unit-economics) if they are installed.
Inputs
- The project in a few sentences: who has the problem, what the solution is, how it will make money.
- What already exists: conversations with customers, prototype, users, revenue, team, money, hours available per week.
- The founder's constraints and goal: side project or full time, budget, deadline, country.
Method
Place the project on the stage ladder, using evidence rather than intentions:
Stage Evidence that it is done Idea A written problem statement and a precise target customer Problem validated A dozen or more conversations where people describe the problem and what they do about it today Solution validated People commit something for the proposed solution: time, an email, a deposit, a letter of intent MVP A first version used by real customers, even if it runs by hand Launch Sign-ups or sales that keep coming from a channel, not only from the founder's network Growth Retention and unit economics that justify spending to grow The "dozen conversations" is a rule of thumb, not a law: say so.
- Name the riskiest assumption of the current stage: the belief that kills the project if it is false (nobody has the problem, nobody pays, the channel costs too much, the product cannot be built).
- Pick the skills for the next 30 days:
- Idea and problem stages:
idea-validation,customer-interviews,desk-research,competitor-teardown. - Solution stage:
mvp-scoping,landing-page,prototype-testing,survey-design. - MVP and launch:
first-customers,brand-identity,financial-forecast,pitch-deck. - At any stage, when the question comes up:
funding-options,support-programs,legal-setup.
- Idea and problem stages:
- Build the 30-day plan: four weekly goals, each with one measurable result (for example "15 interviews done, notes shared"), the skill to use and the hours it needs. Check that the total fits the time the founder really has.
- Set a decision date. At the end of the 30 days, the founder continues, changes direction or stops, using criteria written now, before the results come in.
- Say what can wait. A logo, a company registration, fundraising and paid tools are often done too early. Name what to postpone and why.
Output
### Where the project stands
Stage: <stage> (evidence: <what proves it>)
Riskiest assumption: <the belief that kills the project if it is false>
### 30-day plan
| Week | Goal (measurable) | Skill | Hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | … | `customer-interviews` | … |
### Decision on <date>
Continue if … · Change direction if … · Stop if …
### Not now
<What to postpone, and why.>Quality bar
- The stage is backed by evidence, not by what the founder plans to do.
- The plan tests the riskiest assumption first. It does not start with the logo, the registration or the app.
- Every weekly goal is measurable and fits the founder's real time.
- The decision criteria are written before the results come in.
- Written in the user's language, with the terms below.
Terminology
| English | Français | Español |
| Startup | Startup, jeune pousse | Startup, empresa emergente |
| Founder | Fondateur, fondatrice | Fundador, fundadora |
| Riskiest assumption | Hypothèse la plus risquée | Hipótesis más arriesgada |
| Minimum viable product (MVP) | Produit minimum viable (MVP) | Producto mínimo viable (PMV) |
| Pivot | Pivot | Pivote |
| Product-market fit | Adéquation produit-marché | Encaje producto-mercado |
Sources
- Blank, S. (2013). The Four Steps to the Epiphany (2nd ed.). K&S Ranch.
- Ries, E. (2011). The Lean Startup. Crown Business.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

