tdd
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when implementing any new feature or bugfix using Test-Driven Development. Guides the Red-Green-Refactor cycle: write failing test first, minimal implementation, then refactor. Works with any language (C#, Go, TypeScript, C++).
194 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ishandutta2007/Awesome-Claude-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- trpc/trpctheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- wowyuarm/dsh-agent-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Contexera/dsh-agent-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/dveritytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use capture-learning-tools, design-frontend-dev and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
The-Vibe-CompanySkillcapture-learning-tools
Turn technical conversations, bugs, CI failures, review comments,
Also in 5 projects that use this
The-Vibe-CompanySkilldesign-frontend-dev
Clean Impeccable frontend design skill. Use when the user wants to
Also in 5 projects that use this
tristanphvnSkillketchup-video
Catch the user up like /keel:ketchup, with a short silent video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /keel:ketchup-video.
Also in 14 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillfigure-it-out
Use when novel or multi-phase work needs an auditable workflow and no narrower playbook fits.
Also in 54 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillprinciple-laziness-protocol
Apply when a refactor is adding wrappers or abstractions instead of simplifying.
Also in 45 projects that use this
- +2 more from The-Vibe-Company
- +5 more from jaydubya818
Other versions194 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 194
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- trpc/trpc★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- ccusage/ccusage★ 19ksame name
- ryoppippi/ccusage★ 19ksame name
- MODSetter/SurfSense★ 17ksame name
- GreyDGL/PentestGPT★ 16ksame name
184 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- code-reviewSkill
- dotnet-expertSkill
- git-flowSkill
- go-expertSkill
- nextjs-devSkill
- nuxt-devSkill
- security-auditSkill
- tailwind-uiSkill
- typescript-astroSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 186 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 123
After each TDD cycle:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 186 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Test-Driven Development Skill
When to Use
Activate this skill when the user:
- Asks to implement a feature using TDD
- Wants to write tests before implementation
- Is fixing a bug (write test to reproduce first)
- Wants to practice Red-Green-Refactor
TDD Cycle
1. 🔴 RED — Write a Failing Test
"Write the simplest test that describes the desired behavior.
Run it. Confirm it fails for the RIGHT reason."Ask the user:
- What is the input?
- What is the expected output?
- What are the edge cases?
2. 🟢 GREEN — Write Minimal Code
"Write the MINIMUM code to make the test pass.
Don't over-engineer. Don't optimize. Just make it green."3. 🔵 REFACTOR — Clean Up
"With tests passing, improve the code:
- Extract duplication
- Rename for clarity
- Simplify logic
- Tests must remain green throughout"Language-Specific Templates
C# / xUnit
// 1. RED: Write test first
[Fact]
public async Task CreateOrder_WithValidItems_ReturnsOrderWithTotal()
{
// Arrange
var sut = new OrderService(new FakeRepository());
var items = new[] { new OrderItem("Widget", 2, 9.99m) };
// Act
var order = await sut.CreateOrderAsync(items);
// Assert
order.Total.Should().Be(19.98m);
order.Status.Should().Be(OrderStatus.Pending);
}
// 2. GREEN: Minimal implementation
public async Task<Order> CreateOrderAsync(OrderItem[] items)
{
var total = items.Sum(i => i.Price * i.Quantity);
var order = new Order(items, total, OrderStatus.Pending);
await _repository.SaveAsync(order);
return order;
}Go / testing
// 1. RED
func TestCreateOrder_WithValidItems_ReturnsTotal(t *testing.T) {
svc := NewOrderService(NewFakeRepo())
items := []OrderItem{{Name: "Widget", Qty: 2, Price: 9.99}}
order, err := svc.CreateOrder(context.Background(), items)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
}
if got, want := order.Total, 19.98; math.Abs(got-want) > 0.001 {
t.Errorf("Total = %v, want %v", got, want)
}
}TypeScript / Vitest
// 1. RED
describe('OrderService', () => {
it('calculates total from items', async () => {
const svc = new OrderService(new FakeRepository());
const order = await svc.createOrder([
{ name: 'Widget', qty: 2, price: 9.99 }
]);
expect(order.total).toBeCloseTo(19.98);
expect(order.status).toBe('pending');
});
});TDD Principles
- One failing test at a time — don't write multiple failing tests
- Test behavior, not implementation — test the "what", not the "how"
- Tests are documentation — they should read like specifications
- Fake it till you make it — start with hardcoded returns if needed
- Triangulate — add more test cases to force generalization
Checklist
After each TDD cycle:
- Test name clearly describes behavior (Given/When/Then or MethodName_Scenario_Expected)
- Test fails before implementation (RED confirmed)
- Minimal code to pass (no more than needed)
- All previous tests still pass
- Code is refactored and clean
- Next failing test identified
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

