agentleFS
tasklesstaskless/cli/.agents/skills/openspec-continue-change/SKILL.md

openspec-continue-change

Skill141 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub

Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.

65 other projects use a version of this, 61 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use draft-openspec-docs, release-openspec and 5 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • goernSkill

    draft-openspec-docs

    Collaborative page-drafting mode for the OpenSpec docs. Builds a scratch plan inside the target page (purpose, structure, numbered draft steps), iterates on it with the user, then drafts one section per approved step and cleans up after itself. Use when a page needs a from-scratch rewrite or a new page is being shaped with the user in the loop.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • goernSkill

    release-openspec

    Use this skill when releasing OpenSpec: audit merged work and changeset coverage, decide whether a catch-up changeset PR is needed, prepare or resume the Changesets Version Packages PR, cut a beta or stable release, verify publishing, and polish GitHub release notes. Also use when asked whether an open release PR is complete, what the next release step is, or to continue a release paused for human approval.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    openspec-update-change

    Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • VercelSkill

    vercel-react-best-practices

    React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    release

    Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks to cut/publish a Huabu desktop release or tag a version. Performs an outward action — bumps the version in apps/desktop/package.json, commits + annotated-tags vX.Y.Z, and pushes the branch + tag. That tag push auto-builds the macOS/Windows installers and publishes a GitHub Release. Provides `status`, `bump`, `tag-push`, and a one-command `run` (bump → tag-push).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +2 more from goern

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

17 rules. 14 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 14

    Common

    Most of the 63 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run openspec list --json to get available changes sorted by most recently modified.

    line 20
  2. Common:

    IMPORTANT: Do NOT guess or auto-select a change.

    line 30
  3. Common:

    Read any completed dependency files for context

    line 69
  4. Very specific:

    Use template as the structure - fill in its sections

    line 70
  5. Common:

    Write to the output path specified in instructions

    line 72
  6. Common:

    STOP after creating ONE artifact

    line 74
  7. Common:

    After each invocation, show:

    line 89
  8. Common:

    proposal.md: Ask user about the change if not clear.

    line 105
  9. Common:

    specs/<capability>/spec.md: Create one spec per capability listed in the proposal's Capabilities section (use the capability name, not the …

    line 107
  10. Common:

    design.md: Document technical decisions, architecture, and implementation approach.

    line 108
  11. Common:

    Create ONE artifact per invocation

    line 115
  12. Common:

    Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one

    line 116
  13. Common:

    Never skip artifacts or create out of order

    line 117
  14. Common:

    If context is unclear, ask the user before creating

    line 118
  15. Common:

    Verify the artifact file exists after writing before marking progress

    line 119
  16. Common:

    Use the schema's artifact sequence, don't assume specific artifact names

    line 120
  17. Very specific:

    Do NOT copy <context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifact

    line 122

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 63 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Continue working on a change by creating the next artifact.

Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.

Steps

  1. If no change name provided, prompt for selection

    Run openspec list --json to get available changes sorted by most recently modified. Then use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select which change to work on.

    Present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:

    • Change name
    • Schema (from schema field if present, otherwise "spec-driven")
    • Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
    • How recently it was modified (from lastModified field)

    Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to continue.

    IMPORTANT: Do NOT guess or auto-select a change. Always let the user choose.

  2. Check current status

    openspec status --change "<name>" --json

    Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:

    • schemaName: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
    • artifacts: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "ready", "blocked")
    • isComplete: Boolean indicating if all artifacts are complete
  3. Act based on status:


    If all artifacts are complete (isComplete: true):

    • Congratulate the user
    • Show final status including the schema used
    • Suggest: "All artifacts created! You can now implement this change or archive it."
    • STOP

    If artifacts are ready to create (status shows artifacts with status: "ready"):

    • Pick the FIRST artifact with status: "ready" from the status output
    • Get its instructions:
      openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
    • Parse the JSON. The key fields are:
      • context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
      • rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
      • template: The structure to use for your output file
      • instruction: Schema-specific guidance
      • outputPath: Where to write the artifact
      • dependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
    • Create the artifact file:
      • Read any completed dependency files for context
      • Use template as the structure - fill in its sections
      • Apply context and rules as constraints when writing - but do NOT copy them into the file
      • Write to the output path specified in instructions
    • Show what was created and what's now unlocked
    • STOP after creating ONE artifact

    If no artifacts are ready (all blocked):

    • This shouldn't happen with a valid schema
    • Show status and suggest checking for issues
  4. After creating an artifact, show progress
    openspec status --change "<name>"

Output

After each invocation, show:

  • Which artifact was created
  • Schema workflow being used
  • Current progress (N/M complete)
  • What artifacts are now unlocked
  • Prompt: "Want to continue? Just ask me to continue or tell me what to do next."

Artifact Creation Guidelines

The artifact types and their purpose depend on the schema. Use the instruction field from the instructions output to understand what to create.

Common artifact patterns:

spec-driven schema (proposal → specs → design → tasks):

  • proposal.md: Ask user about the change if not clear. Fill in Why, What Changes, Capabilities, Impact.
    • The Capabilities section is critical - each capability listed will need a spec file.
  • specs/<capability>/spec.md: Create one spec per capability listed in the proposal's Capabilities section (use the capability name, not the change name).
  • design.md: Document technical decisions, architecture, and implementation approach.
  • tasks.md: Break down implementation into checkboxed tasks.

For other schemas, follow the instruction field from the CLI output.

Guardrails

  • Create ONE artifact per invocation
  • Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one
  • Never skip artifacts or create out of order
  • If context is unclear, ask the user before creating
  • Verify the artifact file exists after writing before marking progress
  • Use the schema's artifact sequence, don't assume specific artifact names
  • IMPORTANT: context and rules are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
    • Do NOT copy <context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifact
    • These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.