agentleFS
tasklesstaskless/cli/.agents/skills/openspec-apply-change/SKILL.md

openspec-apply-change

Skill141 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.

147 other projects use a version of this, 140 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use source-command-opsx-apply, source-command-opsx-archive and 4 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • antech2-asyncSkill

    source-command-opsx-apply

    Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • antech2-asyncSkill

    source-command-opsx-archive

    Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    openspec-update-change

    Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.

    Also in 89 projects that use this

  • goernSkill

    draft-openspec-docs

    Collaborative page-drafting mode for the OpenSpec docs. Builds a scratch plan inside the target page (purpose, structure, numbered draft steps), iterates on it with the user, then drafts one section per approved step and cleans up after itself. Use when a page needs a from-scratch rewrite or a new page is being shaped with the user in the loop.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +2 more from antech2-async

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

18 rules. 13 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 13

    Common

    Most of the 142 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    If a name is provided, use it.

    line 20
  2. Very specific:

    If ambiguous, run openspec list --json to get available changes and use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select

    line 23
  3. Very specific:

    Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., /opsx:apply <other>).

    line 25
  4. Very specific:

    If state: "blocked" (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using openspec-continue-change

    line 50
  5. Very specific:

    If state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive

    line 51
  6. Very specific:

    Read the files listed in contextFiles from the apply instructions output.

    line 56
  7. Common:

    Keep changes minimal and focused

    line 74
  8. Common:

    If all done: suggest archive

    line 89
  9. Common:

    If paused: explain why and wait for guidance

    line 90
  10. Common:

    Keep going through tasks until done or blocked

    line 145
  11. Common:

    Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)

    line 146
  12. Common:

    If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing

    line 147
  13. Common:

    If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates

    line 148
  14. Common:

    Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task

    line 149
  15. Common:

    Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task

    line 150
  16. Common:

    Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names

    line 152
  17. Common:

    Can be invoked anytime: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions

    line 158
  18. Common:

    Allows artifact updates: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly

    line 159

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 142 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.

Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.

Steps

  1. Select the change

    If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:

    • Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
    • Auto-select if only one active change exists
    • If ambiguous, run openspec list --json to get available changes and use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select

    Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., /opsx:apply <other>).

  2. Check status to understand the schema

    openspec status --change "<name>" --json

    Parse the JSON to understand:

    • schemaName: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
    • Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
  3. Get apply instructions

    openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json

    This returns:

    • Context file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs)
    • Progress (total, complete, remaining)
    • Task list with status
    • Dynamic instruction based on current state

    Handle states:

    • If state: "blocked" (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using openspec-continue-change
    • If state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive
    • Otherwise: proceed to implementation
  4. Read context files

    Read the files listed in contextFiles from the apply instructions output. The files depend on the schema being used:

    • spec-driven: proposal, specs, design, tasks
    • Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
  5. Show current progress

    Display:

    • Schema being used
    • Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
    • Remaining tasks overview
    • Dynamic instruction from CLI
  6. Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)

    For each pending task:

    • Show which task is being worked on
    • Make the code changes required
    • Keep changes minimal and focused
    • Mark task complete in the tasks file: - [ ] → - [x]
    • Continue to next task

    Pause if:

    • Task is unclear → ask for clarification
    • Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
    • Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
    • User interrupts
  7. On completion or pause, show status

    Display:

    • Tasks completed this session
    • Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
    • If all done: suggest archive
    • If paused: explain why and wait for guidance

Output During Implementation

## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)

Working on task 3/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete

Working on task 4/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete

Output On Completion

## Implementation Complete

**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓

### Completed This Session
- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2
...

All tasks complete! Ready to archive this change.

Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)

## Implementation Paused

**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete

### Issue Encountered
<description of the issue>

**Options:**
1. <option 1>
2. <option 2>
3. Other approach

What would you like to do?

Guardrails

  • Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
  • Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
  • If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
  • If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
  • Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
  • Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
  • Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
  • Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names

Fluid Workflow Integration

This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:

  • Can be invoked anytime: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
  • Allows artifact updates: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.