openspec-apply-change
Skill141 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.
147 other projects use a version of this, 140 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ValorVie/custom-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- full-stack-skills/electron-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- halo-dev/plugin-ai-foundationedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ptonlix/OneSelfedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- FuDesign2008/open-skillsedited, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- feimacode/open-design-agent-kitedited, first seen Nov 6, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use source-command-opsx-apply, source-command-opsx-archive and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
antech2-asyncSkillsource-command-opsx-apply
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental)
Also in 5 projects that use this
antech2-asyncSkillsource-command-opsx-archive
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow
Also in 5 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillopenspec-update-change
Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.
Also in 89 projects that use this
goernSkilldraft-openspec-docs
Collaborative page-drafting mode for the OpenSpec docs. Builds a scratch plan inside the target page (purpose, structure, numbered draft steps), iterates on it with the user, then drafts one section per approved step and cleans up after itself. Use when a page needs a from-scratch rewrite or a new page is being shaped with the user in the loop.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +2 more from antech2-async
Other versions147 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office★ 647100% same
Edited · 140
- Fission-AI/OpenSpec★ 74k31% same
- halo-dev/halo★ 40k81% same
- alibaba/druid★ 28k99% same
- databasus/databasus★ 9.3k43% same
- RostislavDugin/postgresus★ 9.3k43% same
- fonoster/fonoster★ 8.2k86% same
- fleetdm/fleet★ 7.2k96% same
- PBH-BTN/PeerBanHelper★ 6.4k97% same
- KunAgent/Kun★ 6.4k96% same
- XingYu-Zhong/DeepSeek-GUI★ 6.4k96% same
130 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 6
- studyzy/imewlconverter★ 10ksame name
- studyzy/OpenSpec-cn★ 1.3ksame name
- henhen6/mdp★ 133same name
- charliehzm/medharness★ 85same name
- beautifulSoup/speccoding-template★ 62same name
- redhat-developer/rhdh-skills★ 20same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- code-simplifierSkill
- iterate-prSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-bulk-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-continue-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-ff-changeSkill
- openspec-new-changeSkill
- openspec-onboardSkill
- openspec-proposeSkill
- openspec-sync-specsSkill
- openspec-verify-changeSkill
- tasklessSkill
- worktrees-pnpmSkill
- tasklessSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
18 rules. 13 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
13
Common
Most of the 142 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 20
If a name is provided, use it.
- Very specific: line 23
If ambiguous, run openspec list --json to get available changes and use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select
- Very specific: line 25
Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., /opsx:apply <other>).
- Very specific: line 50
If state: "blocked" (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using openspec-continue-change
- Very specific: line 51
If state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive
- Very specific: line 56
Read the files listed in contextFiles from the apply instructions output.
- Common: line 74
Keep changes minimal and focused
- Common: line 89
If all done: suggest archive
- Common: line 90
If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
- Common: line 145
Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
- Common: line 146
Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
- Common: line 147
If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
- Common: line 148
If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
- Common: line 149
Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
- Common: line 150
Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
- Common: line 152
Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
- Common: line 158
Can be invoked anytime: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
- Common: line 159
Allows artifact updates: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 142 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
Select the change
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
- Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
- Auto-select if only one active change exists
- If ambiguous, run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes and use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select
Always announce: "Using change:
<name>" and how to override (e.g.,/opsx:apply <other>).Check status to understand the schema
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonParse the JSON to understand:
schemaName: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")- Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
Get apply instructions
openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --jsonThis returns:
- Context file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs)
- Progress (total, complete, remaining)
- Task list with status
- Dynamic instruction based on current state
Handle states:
- If
state: "blocked"(missing artifacts): show message, suggest using openspec-continue-change - If
state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive - Otherwise: proceed to implementation
Read context files
Read the files listed in
contextFilesfrom the apply instructions output. The files depend on the schema being used:- spec-driven: proposal, specs, design, tasks
- Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
Show current progress
Display:
- Schema being used
- Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- Remaining tasks overview
- Dynamic instruction from CLI
Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)
For each pending task:
- Show which task is being worked on
- Make the code changes required
- Keep changes minimal and focused
- Mark task complete in the tasks file:
- [ ]→- [x] - Continue to next task
Pause if:
- Task is unclear → ask for clarification
- Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
- Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
- User interrupts
On completion or pause, show status
Display:
- Tasks completed this session
- Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- If all done: suggest archive
- If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
Output During Implementation
## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)
Working on task 3/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Working on task 4/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task completeOutput On Completion
## Implementation Complete
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓
### Completed This Session
- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2
...
All tasks complete! Ready to archive this change.Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)
## Implementation Paused
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete
### Issue Encountered
<description of the issue>
**Options:**
1. <option 1>
2. <option 2>
3. Other approach
What would you like to do?Guardrails
- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
- Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
- Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
Fluid Workflow Integration
This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:
- Can be invoked anytime: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
- Allows artifact updates: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

