create-technical-spike
Skill1 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create time-boxed technical spike documents for researching and resolving critical development decisions before implementation.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- github/awesome-copilotword for word, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- ReaperOAK/ForgeOSword for word, first seen Jun 8, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41k100% same
- ReaperOAK/ForgeOS★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository95 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-architectureSkill
- agentic-evalSkill
- agent-owasp-complianceSkill
- agent-skill-stackSkill
- ai-readySkill
- ai-team-orchestrationSkill
- answer-me-with-htmlSkill
- anti-ui-slopSkill
- archifySkill
- autoresearchSkill
- batch-script-progressSkill
- cli-creatorSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-exemplars-blueprint-generatorSkill
- copilot-instructions-blueprint-generatorSkill
- create-agentsmdSkill
- create-architectural-decision-recordSkill
- create-github-action-workflow-specificationSkill
- create-github-issues-feature-from-implementation-planSkill
- create-readmeSkill
- create-specificationSkill
- create-tldr-pageSkill
- docs-sync-auditSkill
- folder-structure-blueprint-generatorSkill
- gh-fix-ciSkill
- github-actions-hardeningSkill
- github-repo-careSkill
- impeccableSkill
- launchd-automationSkill
- mcp-security-auditSkill
- notion-cliSkill
- opencode-model-routerSkill
- playwright-cliSkill
- python-pypi-package-builderSkill
- refactorSkill
- simple-englishSkill
- swiftui-expert-skillSkill
- technical-documentationSkill
- workshop-driverSkill
- xerj-hubSkill
- xerjSkill
- anti-ui-slopSkill
- autoresearchSkill
- batch-script-progressSkill
- calling-frontend-from-tauri-rustSkill
- calling-rust-from-tauri-frontendSkill
- cli-creatorSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-exemplars-blueprint-generatorSkill
- configuring-tauri-appsSkill
- configuring-tauri-capabilitiesSkill
- configuring-tauri-cspSkill
- configuring-tauri-permissionsSkill
- configuring-tauri-scopesSkill
- copilot-instructions-blueprint-generatorSkill
- create-agentsmdSkill
- create-architectural-decision-recordSkill
- create-github-action-workflow-specificationSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Create time-boxed technical spike documents for researching critical questions that must be answered before development can proceed.
- Very specific: line 12
Create individual files in ${input:FolderPath|docs/spikes} directory.
- Distinctive: line 167
Use descriptive, kebab-case names that indicate the category and specific unknown:
- Distinctive: line 195
Clear Recommendations: Document specific recommendations and rationale for implementation
- Distinctive: line 199
Outcome-Focused: Every spike must result in an actionable decision or recommendation
- Distinctive: line 227
editFiles: Update research progress and findings
- Distinctive: line 228
vscodeAPI: Test VS Code extension capabilities and limitations
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Create Technical Spike Document
Create time-boxed technical spike documents for researching critical questions that must be answered before development can proceed. Each spike focuses on a specific technical decision with clear deliverables and timelines.
Document Structure
Create individual files in ${input:FolderPath|docs/spikes} directory. Name each file using the pattern: [category]-[short-description]-spike.md (e.g., api-copilot-integration-spike.md, performance-realtime-audio-spike.md).
---
title: "${input:SpikeTitle}"
category: "${input:Category|Technical}"
status: "🔴 Not Started"
priority: "${input:Priority|High}"
timebox: "${input:Timebox|1 week}"
created: [YYYY-MM-DD]
updated: [YYYY-MM-DD]
owner: "${input:Owner}"
tags: ["technical-spike", "${input:Category|technical}", "research"]
---
# ${input:SpikeTitle}
## Summary
**Spike Objective:** [Clear, specific question or decision that needs resolution]
**Why This Matters:** [Impact on development/architecture decisions]
**Timebox:** [How much time allocated to this spike]
**Decision Deadline:** [When this must be resolved to avoid blocking development]
## Research Question(s)
**Primary Question:** [Main technical question that needs answering]
**Secondary Questions:**
- [Related question 1]
- [Related question 2]
- [Related question 3]
## Investigation Plan
### Research Tasks
- [ ] [Specific research task 1]
- [ ] [Specific research task 2]
- [ ] [Specific research task 3]
- [ ] [Create proof of concept/prototype]
- [ ] [Document findings and recommendations]
### Success Criteria
**This spike is complete when:**
- [ ] [Specific criteria 1]
- [ ] [Specific criteria 2]
- [ ] [Clear recommendation documented]
- [ ] [Proof of concept completed (if applicable)]
## Technical Context
**Related Components:** [List system components affected by this decision]
**Dependencies:** [What other spikes or decisions depend on resolving this]
**Constraints:** [Known limitations or requirements that affect the solution]
## Research Findings
### Investigation Results
[Document research findings, test results, and evidence gathered]
### Prototype/Testing Notes
[Results from any prototypes, spikes, or technical experiments]
### External Resources
- [Link to relevant documentation]
- [Link to API references]
- [Link to community discussions]
- [Link to examples/tutorials]
## Decision
### Recommendation
[Clear recommendation based on research findings]
### Rationale
[Why this approach was chosen over alternatives]
### Implementation Notes
[Key considerations for implementation]
### Follow-up Actions
- [ ] [Action item 1]
- [ ] [Action item 2]
- [ ] [Update architecture documents]
- [ ] [Create implementation tasks]
## Status History
| Date | Status | Notes |
| ------ | -------------- | -------------------------- |
| [Date] | 🔴 Not Started | Spike created and scoped |
| [Date] | 🟡 In Progress | Research commenced |
| [Date] | 🟢 Complete | [Resolution summary] |
---
_Last updated: [Date] by [Name]_Categories for Technical Spikes
API Integration
- Third-party API capabilities and limitations
- Integration patterns and authentication
- Rate limits and performance characteristics
Architecture & Design
- System architecture decisions
- Design pattern applicability
- Component interaction models
Performance & Scalability
- Performance requirements and constraints
- Scalability bottlenecks and solutions
- Resource utilization patterns
Platform & Infrastructure
- Platform capabilities and limitations
- Infrastructure requirements
- Deployment and hosting considerations
Security & Compliance
- Security requirements and implementations
- Compliance constraints
- Authentication and authorization approaches
User Experience
- User interaction patterns
- Accessibility requirements
- Interface design decisions
File Naming Conventions
Use descriptive, kebab-case names that indicate the category and specific unknown:
API/Integration Examples:
api-copilot-chat-integration-spike.mdapi-azure-speech-realtime-spike.mdapi-vscode-extension-capabilities-spike.md
Performance Examples:
performance-audio-processing-latency-spike.mdperformance-extension-host-limitations-spike.mdperformance-webrtc-reliability-spike.md
Architecture Examples:
architecture-voice-pipeline-design-spike.mdarchitecture-state-management-spike.mdarchitecture-error-handling-strategy-spike.md
Best Practices for AI Agents
- One Question Per Spike: Each document focuses on a single technical decision or research question
- Time-Boxed Research: Define specific time limits and deliverables for each spike
- Evidence-Based Decisions: Require concrete evidence (tests, prototypes, documentation) before marking as complete
- Clear Recommendations: Document specific recommendations and rationale for implementation
- Dependency Tracking: Identify how spikes relate to each other and impact project decisions
- Outcome-Focused: Every spike must result in an actionable decision or recommendation
Research Strategy
Phase 1: Information Gathering
- Search existing documentation using search/fetch tools
- Analyze codebase for existing patterns and constraints
- Research external resources (APIs, libraries, examples)
Phase 2: Validation & Testing
- Create focused prototypes to test specific hypotheses
- Run targeted experiments to validate assumptions
- Document test results with supporting evidence
Phase 3: Decision & Documentation
- Synthesize findings into clear recommendations
- Document implementation guidance for development team
- Create follow-up tasks for implementation
Tools Usage
- search/searchResults: Research existing solutions and documentation
- fetch/githubRepo: Analyze external APIs, libraries, and examples
- codebase: Understand existing system constraints and patterns
- runTasks: Execute prototypes and validation tests
- editFiles: Update research progress and findings
- vscodeAPI: Test VS Code extension capabilities and limitations
Focus on time-boxed research that resolves critical technical decisions and unblocks development progress.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

