agentleFS
taixuanntaixuann/development-space/.agents/skills/create-github-action-workflow-specification/SKILL.md

create-github-action-workflow-specification

Skill1 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub

Create a formal specification for an existing GitHub Actions CI/CD workflow, optimized for AI consumption and workflow maintenance.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Create a comprehensive specification for the GitHub Actions workflow: ${input:WorkflowFile}.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Token Efficiency: Use concise language without sacrificing clarity

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Semantic Clarity: Use precise terminology consistently throughout

    line 16
  4. Distinctive:

    Implementation Abstraction: Avoid specific syntax, commands, or tool versions

    line 17
  5. Distinctive:

    When analyzing the workflow file:

    line 230
  6. Distinctive:

    Map Job Flow: Create dependency graph showing execution order

    line 233
  7. Distinctive:

    Identify Contracts: Document inputs, outputs, and interfaces

    line 234
  8. Distinctive:

    Bullet Points: Avoid prose paragraphs

    line 272

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Create GitHub Actions Workflow Specification

Create a comprehensive specification for the GitHub Actions workflow: ${input:WorkflowFile}.

This specification serves as a specification for the workflow's behavior, requirements, and constraints. It must be implementation-agnostic, focusing on what the workflow accomplishes rather than how it's implemented.

AI-Optimized Requirements

  • Token Efficiency: Use concise language without sacrificing clarity
  • Structured Data: Leverage tables, lists, and diagrams for dense information
  • Semantic Clarity: Use precise terminology consistently throughout
  • Implementation Abstraction: Avoid specific syntax, commands, or tool versions
  • Maintainability: Design for easy updates as workflow evolves

Specification Template

Save as: /spec/spec-process-cicd-[workflow-name].md

---
title: CI/CD Workflow Specification - [Workflow Name]
version: 1.0
date_created: [YYYY-MM-DD]
last_updated: [YYYY-MM-DD]
owner: DevOps Team
tags: [process, cicd, github-actions, automation, [domain-specific-tags]]
---

## Workflow Overview

**Purpose**: [One sentence describing workflow's primary goal]
**Trigger Events**: [List trigger conditions]
**Target Environments**: [Environment scope]

## Execution Flow Diagram

```mermaid
graph TD
    A[Trigger Event] --> B[Job 1]
    B --> C[Job 2]
    C --> D[Job 3]
    D --> E[End]
    
    B --> F[Parallel Job]
    F --> D
    
    style A fill:#e1f5fe
    style E fill:#e8f5e8

Jobs & Dependencies

Job NamePurposeDependenciesExecution Context
job-1[Purpose][Prerequisites][Runner/Environment]
job-2[Purpose]job-1[Runner/Environment]

Requirements Matrix

Functional Requirements

IDRequirementPriorityAcceptance Criteria
REQ-001[Requirement]High[Testable criteria]
REQ-002[Requirement]Medium[Testable criteria]

Security Requirements

IDRequirementImplementation Constraint
SEC-001[Security requirement][Constraint description]

Performance Requirements

IDMetricTargetMeasurement Method
PERF-001[Metric][Target value][How measured]

Input/Output Contracts

Inputs

# Environment Variables
ENV_VAR_1: string  # Purpose: [description]
ENV_VAR_2: secret  # Purpose: [description]

# Repository Triggers
paths: [list of path filters]
branches: [list of branch patterns]

Outputs

# Job Outputs
job_1_output: string  # Description: [purpose]
build_artifact: file  # Description: [content type]

Secrets & Variables

TypeNamePurposeScope
SecretSECRET_1[Purpose]Workflow
VariableVAR_1[Purpose]Repository

Execution Constraints

Runtime Constraints

  • Timeout: [Maximum execution time]
  • Concurrency: [Parallel execution limits]
  • Resource Limits: [Memory/CPU constraints]

Environmental Constraints

  • Runner Requirements: [OS/hardware needs]
  • Network Access: [External connectivity needs]
  • Permissions: [Required access levels]

Error Handling Strategy

Error TypeResponseRecovery Action
Build Failure[Response][Recovery steps]
Test Failure[Response][Recovery steps]
Deployment Failure[Response][Recovery steps]

Quality Gates

Gate Definitions

GateCriteriaBypass Conditions
Code Quality[Standards][When allowed]
Security Scan[Thresholds][When allowed]
Test Coverage[Percentage][When allowed]

Monitoring & Observability

Key Metrics

  • Success Rate: [Target percentage]
  • Execution Time: [Target duration]
  • Resource Usage: [Monitoring approach]

Alerting

ConditionSeverityNotification Target
[Condition][Level][Who/Where]

Integration Points

External Systems

SystemIntegration TypeData ExchangeSLA Requirements
[System][Type][Data format][Requirements]

Dependent Workflows

WorkflowRelationshipTrigger Mechanism
[Workflow][Type][How triggered]

Compliance & Governance

Audit Requirements

  • Execution Logs: [Retention policy]
  • Approval Gates: [Required approvals]
  • Change Control: [Update process]

Security Controls

  • Access Control: [Permission model]
  • Secret Management: [Rotation policy]
  • Vulnerability Scanning: [Scan frequency]

Edge Cases & Exceptions

Scenario Matrix

ScenarioExpected BehaviorValidation Method
[Edge case][Behavior][How to verify]

Validation Criteria

Workflow Validation

  • VLD-001: [Validation rule]
  • VLD-002: [Validation rule]

Performance Benchmarks

  • PERF-001: [Benchmark criteria]
  • PERF-002: [Benchmark criteria]

Change Management

Update Process

  1. Specification Update: Modify this document first
  2. Review & Approval: [Approval process]
  3. Implementation: Apply changes to workflow
  4. Testing: [Validation approach]
  5. Deployment: [Release process]

Version History

VersionDateChangesAuthor
1.0[Date]Initial specification[Author]

Related Specifications

  • [Link to related workflow specs]
  • [Link to infrastructure specs]
  • [Link to deployment specs]

## Analysis Instructions

When analyzing the workflow file:

1. **Extract Core Purpose**: Identify the primary business objective
2. **Map Job Flow**: Create dependency graph showing execution order
3. **Identify Contracts**: Document inputs, outputs, and interfaces
4. **Capture Constraints**: Extract timeouts, permissions, and limits
5. **Define Quality Gates**: Identify validation and approval points
6. **Document Error Paths**: Map failure scenarios and recovery
7. **Abstract Implementation**: Focus on behavior, not syntax

## Mermaid Diagram Guidelines

### Flow Types
- **Sequential**: `A --> B --> C`
- **Parallel**: `A --> B & A --> C; B --> D & C --> D`
- **Conditional**: `A --> B{Decision}; B -->|Yes| C; B -->|No| D`

### Styling
```mermaid
style TriggerNode fill:#e1f5fe
style SuccessNode fill:#e8f5e8
style FailureNode fill:#ffebee
style ProcessNode fill:#f3e5f5

Complex Workflows

For workflows with 5+ jobs, use subgraphs:

graph TD
    subgraph "Build Phase"
        A[Lint] --> B[Test] --> C[Build]
    end
    subgraph "Deploy Phase"  
        D[Staging] --> E[Production]
    end
    C --> D

Token Optimization Strategies

  1. Use Tables: Dense information in structured format
  2. Abbreviate Consistently: Define once, use throughout
  3. Bullet Points: Avoid prose paragraphs
  4. Code Blocks: Structured data over narrative
  5. Cross-Reference: Link instead of repeat information

Focus on creating a specification that serves as both documentation and a template for workflow updates.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.