agentleFS
synaptiaisynaptiai/agent-capability-standard/skills/receive/SKILL.md

receive

Skill6 starsChanged 14 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Ingest and parse incoming messages, events, or signals into structured form. Use when processing external inputs, handling API responses, parsing webhook payloads, or ingesting sensor data.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

15 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈14

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Validate source accessibility: Verify source can be read

    line 53
  2. Distinctive:

    Check file exists and is readable

    line 54
  3. Distinctive:

    Verify URL is reachable

    line 55
  4. Distinctive:

    Check size does not exceed the size limit

    line 57
  5. Distinctive:

    Check content-type headers or file extension

    line 60
  6. Distinctive:

    Validate structure: Check parsed data against schema

    line 72
  7. Very specific:

    If a schema applies to the channel (e.g.

    line 73
  8. Distinctive:

    If no schema: perform basic sanity checks

    line 74
  9. Distinctive:

    Verification tools: Read (to access file sources), Grep (to search for patterns in text data)

    line 332
  10. Distinctive:

    Do not execute or run arbitrary code from received data

    line 342
  11. Distinctive:

    Use safe parsing methods (JSON.parse, safe YAML loader)

    line 343
  12. Distinctive:

    Do not store credentials or secrets found in payloads

    line 346
  13. Distinctive:

    Never process received data without validation

    line 363
  14. Distinctive:

    Never trust received data for authentication decisions without verification

    line 364
  15. Distinctive:

    Avoid processing unbounded streams without size limits

    line 365

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Intent

Execute receive to ingest incoming data from external sources and parse it into a structured, validated form for downstream processing.

Success criteria:

  • Input data is successfully ingested from the source
  • Data is parsed according to expected format
  • Validation against schema (if one applies) passes or errors are captured
  • Structured output is ready for downstream capabilities
  • Malformed or unexpected data is handled gracefully

Compatible schemas:

  • schemas/output_schema.yaml
  • reference/event_schema.yaml

Inputs

ParameterRequiredTypeDescription
channelNostringSource channel
filterNoobjectEvent filter criteria
timeoutNostringWait timeout
accept_fromNoarray[string]Principals to accept items from; items from others are dropped and counted, and each kept item carries its authenticated sender (Standard v1.1 delegation@1)
sender_checkNoarray[string]Accepted authenticated_by values of the sender's identity; items without a matching identity are dropped and counted (Standard v1.1 identity@1)
accept_trust_classesNoarray[string]Trust classes to accept items from; others are dropped and counted (identity@1). Any kept item with an identity carries it as sender_identity
always_ask_trust_classesNoarray[string]Trust classes whose items (and items with no trust class) make any step that requires approval and uses them be asked of a person, whatever mandate would cover it (identity@1)

Inputs not listed here are outside the capability's contract: a workflow step that binds them gets W604 (STANDARD v1.1 §5.5).

In a workflow, a step can also wait for a matching event with a required timeout (Standard v1.1 wait@1); see ORCHESTRATION_EXTENSIONS.md.

Procedure

  1. Identify input source: Determine where data is coming from
    • File path: Read from local filesystem
    • URL: Fetch from network endpoint
    • Inline: Extract from request payload
    • Stream: Connect to data stream
  2. Validate source accessibility: Verify source can be read
    • Check file exists and is readable
    • Verify URL is reachable
    • Confirm stream is connected
    • Check size does not exceed the size limit
  3. Detect format: Identify data format if not specified
    • Check content-type headers or file extension
    • Inspect data prefix for format signatures
    • Fall back to text if ambiguous
  4. Parse input: Transform raw data into structured form
    • JSON: Parse to object/array using safe parser
    • XML: Parse to DOM or object representation
    • YAML: Parse to object using safe loader
    • CSV: Parse to array of records
    • Text: Split into lines/tokens as appropriate
    • Binary: Extract structured fields per schema
  5. Validate structure: Check parsed data against schema
    • If a schema applies to the channel (e.g. schemas/event_v2.yaml): validate and collect errors
    • If no schema: perform basic sanity checks
    • Flag missing required fields
    • Flag type mismatches
  6. Extract events/messages: Identify discrete units in the data
    • Single message: wrap as single-element array
    • Batch: extract individual events
    • Stream chunk: identify complete messages
  7. Ground evidence: Record provenance for ingested data
    • Source URI or path
    • Timestamp of receipt
    • Size and checksum if applicable
  8. Format output: Structure results according to output contract

Output Contract

Return a structured object:

source: string  # Event source: where data came from
timestamp: string  # ISO 8601 date-time of receipt
received:
  source_type: file | url | inline | stream
  format_detected: json | xml | yaml | csv | text | binary
  size_bytes: integer  # Size of received data
  encoding: string  # Character encoding used
data:
  - id: string  # Unique message identifier
    type: string | null  # Event/message type if identifiable
    payload: object  # Parsed message content
    timestamp: string | null  # Message timestamp if present
    metadata: object | null  # Additional message metadata
    sender: string  # Host-authenticated principal that sent the item (with accept_from)
    sender_identity: object  # Sender's identity as the host reported it (identity@1)
parsed_count: integer  # Number of messages/events parsed
validation:
  schema_ref: string | null  # Schema used for validation
  valid: boolean  # Whether all messages passed validation
  errors:
    - message_id: string
      field: string
      error: string
      severity: error | warning
conflicts:
  - type: string  # Type of conflict/anomaly
    description: string
    affected_messages: array[string]
confidence: number  # 0.0-1.0 based on parse success and validation
evidence_anchors: array[string]  # Source references
assumptions: array[string]  # Explicit assumptions

Field Definitions

FieldTypeDescription
dataarray[object]Received messages/events, each with its parsed payload (and sender / sender_identity when the host authenticates senders)
sourcestringEvent source: origin of the data
timestampstringISO 8601 date-time of receipt
receivedobjectTransport details: source type, detected format, size, encoding
validation.validbooleanWhether validation passed
validation.errorsarrayValidation error details
conflictsarrayAnomalies or conflicts in data
confidencenumberLower if parse errors or validation failures
evidence_anchorsarraySource references
assumptionsarrayExplicit assumptions

Examples

Example 1: Receiving JSON API Response

Input:

channel: "https://api.example.com/events"

Output:

source: "https://api.example.com/events"
timestamp: "2024-01-16T12:00:00Z"
received:
  source_type: url
  format_detected: json
  size_bytes: 4256
  encoding: "utf-8"
data:
  - id: "evt_001"
    type: "order.created"
    payload:
      order_id: "ORD-12345"
      customer_id: "CUST-789"
      total: 129.99
      currency: "USD"
    timestamp: "2024-01-16T11:58:30Z"
    metadata:
      source_system: "ecommerce"
      version: "2.1"
  - id: "evt_002"
    type: "order.paid"
    payload:
      order_id: "ORD-12345"
      payment_method: "credit_card"
      transaction_id: "TXN-ABC123"
    timestamp: "2024-01-16T11:59:00Z"
    metadata:
      source_system: "payments"
      version: "1.0"
parsed_count: 2
validation:
  schema_ref: "schemas/event_v2.yaml"
  valid: true
  errors: []
conflicts: []
confidence: 1.0
evidence_anchors:
  - "url:https://api.example.com/events"
  - "schema:schemas/event_v2.yaml"
assumptions:
  - "API response is authoritative source of truth"
  - "Timestamps are in UTC"

Evidence pattern: Source URL recorded; schema validation confirmed; each message given unique ID.


Example 2: Receiving Malformed Data

Input:

channel: "/var/log/sensor_data.json"

Output:

source: "/var/log/sensor_data.json"
timestamp: "2024-01-16T14:30:00Z"
received:
  source_type: file
  format_detected: json
  size_bytes: 1024
  encoding: "utf-8"
data:
  - id: "msg_001"
    type: "sensor_reading"
    payload:
      sensor_id: "SENS-001"
      temperature: 23.5
      humidity: null
      timestamp: "2024-01-16T14:29:00Z"
    timestamp: "2024-01-16T14:29:00Z"
    metadata: null
  - id: "msg_002"
    type: "sensor_reading"
    payload:
      sensor_id: "SENS-002"
      temperature: "ERROR"
      humidity: 65.2
      timestamp: null
    timestamp: null
    metadata: null
parsed_count: 2
validation:
  schema_ref: "schemas/sensor_reading.yaml"
  valid: false
  errors:
    - message_id: "msg_001"
      field: "humidity"
      error: "Required field is null"
      severity: warning
    - message_id: "msg_002"
      field: "temperature"
      error: "Expected number, got string 'ERROR'"
      severity: error
    - message_id: "msg_002"
      field: "timestamp"
      error: "Required field is null"
      severity: error
conflicts:
  - type: "data_quality"
    description: "Sensor SENS-002 reporting error state instead of reading"
    affected_messages: ["msg_002"]
confidence: 0.5
evidence_anchors:
  - "file:/var/log/sensor_data.json"
  - "schema:schemas/sensor_reading.yaml"
assumptions:
  - "File contains most recent sensor batch"
  - "'ERROR' string indicates sensor malfunction"
next_actions:
  - "Investigate sensor SENS-002 for malfunction"
  - "Check why SENS-001 humidity is null"

Example 3: Receiving Webhook Payload

Input:

channel: inline  # payload delivered with the request

Payload received:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<notification type="alert">
  <severity>high</severity>
  <message>CPU usage exceeded threshold</message>
  <host>server-01</host>
</notification>

Output:

source: "inline"
timestamp: "2024-01-16T15:00:00Z"
received:
  source_type: inline
  format_detected: xml
  size_bytes: 198
  encoding: "utf-8"
data:
  - id: "msg_001"
    type: "notification.alert"
    payload:
      severity: "high"
      message: "CPU usage exceeded threshold"
      host: "server-01"
    timestamp: null
    metadata:
      xml_root: "notification"
      xml_attributes:
        type: "alert"
parsed_count: 1
validation:
  schema_ref: null
  valid: true
  errors: []
conflicts: []
confidence: 0.95
evidence_anchors:
  - "inline:xml:notification"
assumptions:
  - "XML is well-formed and complete"
  - "No schema validation requested"

Verification

  • Source is accessible and data retrieved successfully
  • Format detection matches actual data format
  • All messages parsed without critical errors
  • Validation errors logged with actionable detail
  • confidence reflects parse success rate

Verification tools: Read (to access file sources), Grep (to search for patterns in text data)

Safety Constraints

  • mutation: false
  • requires_checkpoint: false
  • requires_approval: false
  • risk: low

Capability-specific rules:

  • Do not execute or run arbitrary code from received data
  • Use safe parsing methods (JSON.parse, safe YAML loader)
  • Validate size limits before loading large files into memory
  • Sanitize file paths to prevent directory traversal
  • Do not store credentials or secrets found in payloads
  • Log but do not propagate malformed/suspicious data without flagging

Composition Patterns

Commonly follows:

  • External triggers (webhooks, API calls, file drops)
  • schedule - Scheduled data ingestion

Commonly precedes:

  • transform - Normalize received data for processing
  • validate - Deeper validation beyond schema
  • integrate - Merge received data with existing state
  • synchronize - Combine with other data sources
  • recall - Check received data against prior context

Anti-patterns:

  • Never process received data without validation
  • Never trust received data for authentication decisions without verification
  • Avoid processing unbounded streams without size limits

Workflow references:

  • See reference/composition_patterns.md#digital-twin-sync-loop for receive as entry point
  • First step in most data ingestion pipelines

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.