agentleFS
synaptiaisynaptiai/agent-capability-standard/skills/checkpoint/SKILL.md

checkpoint

Skill6 starsChanged 14 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Create a safety checkpoint marker before mutation or execution steps. Use when about to modify files, execute plans, or perform any irreversible action. Essential for the CAVR pattern.

  • Reads credentials

91 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use aside, spinoff and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • TheKREATORSSkill

    aside

    Answer a quick side question without interrupting or losing context from the current task. Resume work automatically after answering.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AhmedMerzaSkill

    spinoff

    After a branch is finished, harvest the work it made CHEAP — the helper you wrote that four other sites now hand-roll, the plumbing that turned a deferred feature small, the pattern that just split the codebase in two. Produces a follow-up backlog (0–3 candidates, feeding /issue), NEVER commits on the current branch. Invoke with /spinoff at the tail of the chain — after /fix-review has settled the review findings, before the MR merges — or when the user asks \"what else should we do while we're here / what did this unlock / anything to follow up on\". This is ship-check's optional twin — that finds what's MISSING and blocks the merge; this finds what's now CHEAP and blocks nothing. Restraint-gated: \"nothing spun off\" is the common and correct answer, and a finding that would have been equally valid before this branch is not a finding.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • TheKREATORSSkill

    instinct-export

    Export instincts from project/global scope to a file

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • seek888Skill

    open-gstack-browser

    Launch GStack Browser — AI-controlled Chromium with the sidebar extension baked in. Opens a visible browser window where you can watch every action in real time. The sidebar shows a live activity feed and chat. Anti-bot stealth built in. Use when asked to "open gstack browser", "launch browser", "connect chrome", "open chrome", "real browser", "launch chrome", "side panel", or "control my browser". Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "show me the browser".

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • diego-tobalinaSkill

    build-fix

    Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • seek888Skill

    design-html

    Design finalization: generates production-quality Pretext-native HTML/CSS. Works with approved mockups from /design-shotgun, CEO plans from /plan-ceo-review, design review context from /plan-design-review, or from scratch with a user description. Text actually reflows, heights are computed, layouts are dynamic. 30KB overhead, zero deps. Smart API routing: picks the right Pretext patterns for each design type. Use when: "finalize this design", "turn this into HTML", "build me a page", "implement this design", or after any planning skill. Proactively suggest when user has approved a design or has a plan ready. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "build the design", "code the mockup", "make it real".

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • +2 more from TheKREATORS
  • +2 more from seek888

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 85 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 10

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    All files/state in scope are captured

    line 57
  2. Distinctive:

    Check for uncommitted git changes in scope

    line 79
  3. Distinctive:

    Verify checkpoint integrity immediately after creation

    line 91
  4. Distinctive:

    Generate restore command: Document how to rollback

    line 93
  5. Distinctive:

    NEVER skip checkpoint before mutate or send (CRITICAL)

    line 247
  6. Distinctive:

    NEVER delete checkpoints until explicitly requested

    line 248
  7. Distinctive:

    ALWAYS verify checkpoint integrity immediately after creation

    line 249
  8. Distinctive:

    Do not checkpoint sensitive files (.env, credentials) - warn and exclude

    line 250
  9. Distinctive:

    Never checkpoint after mutation has started

    line 270
  10. Distinctive:

    Never delete checkpoint before verify confirms success

    line 271

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 85 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Intent

Execute checkpoint to create a restorable state marker before any mutating operation. This is the foundation of safe agentic execution - enabling rollback if subsequent actions fail.

Success criteria:

  • Checkpoint successfully created with unique identifier
  • All files/state in scope are captured
  • Restore command is documented and tested
  • Expiry policy set if applicable

Compatible schemas:

  • schemas/output_schema.yaml

Inputs

ParameterRequiredTypeDescription
scopeYesstringFiles, directories, or state keys to checkpoint
labelNostringCheckpoint name
metadataNoobjectAdditional metadata

Inputs not listed here are outside the capability's contract: a workflow step that binds them gets W604 (STANDARD v1.1 §5.5).

Procedure

  1. Identify scope: Determine exactly what needs to be checkpointed
    • List all files that will be modified by upcoming mutation
    • Include related configuration or state files
    • Check for uncommitted git changes in scope
  2. Select checkpoint type: Choose appropriate mechanism
    • git_stash: For git-tracked files (preferred for code changes)
    • file_backup: For non-git files, copy to .checkpoints/
    • state_snapshot: For in-memory or runtime state
    • database_savepoint: For database transactions
  3. Capture pre-mutation state: Execute the checkpoint
    • For git: git stash push -m "checkpoint:<id>:<reason>"
    • For files: Copy to .checkpoints/<id>/ with manifest
    • Record hashes of all captured content
    • Verify checkpoint integrity immediately after creation
  4. Generate restore command: Document how to rollback
    • Exact command(s) to restore state
    • Any prerequisites for restoration
    • Order of operations if multiple systems involved
  5. Ground claims: Attach evidence of checkpoint creation
    • Format: tool:bash:<command>, file:<checkpoint_path>
    • Include hash verification output
  6. Format output: Return checkpoint metadata per contract

Output Contract

Return a structured object:

checkpoint_id: string  # Unique identifier (e.g., "chk_20240115_143022_abc123")
timestamp: string  # ISO 8601 date-time the checkpoint was created
size: integer  # Checkpoint size in bytes (optional)
checkpoint_created: boolean  # Whether the checkpoint was successfully created
type: git_stash | file_backup | state_snapshot | database_savepoint
scope:
  files: array[string]  # File paths included
  state_keys: array[string]  # State keys included (if applicable)
restore_command: string  # Exact command to restore
expiry: string | null  # When checkpoint expires
pre_mutation_state:
  hash: string | null  # Combined hash of all checkpointed content
  summary: string  # Human-readable state summary
next_safe_actions: array[string]  # What can now safely proceed
confidence: number  # 0.0-1.0
evidence_anchors: ["tool:bash:...", "file:..."]
assumptions: []

Field Definitions

FieldTypeDescription
checkpoint_idstringUnique identifier for this checkpoint (workflows bind ${<step>.checkpoint_id})
timestampstringISO 8601 date-time the checkpoint was created
sizeintegerCheckpoint size in bytes (optional)
checkpoint_createdbooleanWhether checkpoint was successfully created
typeenumMechanism used for checkpointing
scopeobjectWhat was included in the checkpoint
restore_commandstringExact command to restore state
expirystringWhen the checkpoint expires, or null
pre_mutation_state.hashstringIntegrity hash of captured state
next_safe_actionsarrayActions that can now safely proceed
confidencenumber0.0-1.0 based on checkpoint integrity verification
evidence_anchorsarrayProof of checkpoint creation
assumptionsarrayExplicit assumptions (e.g., "git available")

Examples

Example 1: Git Stash Checkpoint

Input:

scope: "src/api/handlers/*.py tests/test_handlers.py"
metadata:
  reason: "Before refactoring API handlers"
  checkpoint_type: git_stash

Output:

checkpoint_id: "chk_20240115_143022_a7b3c9"
timestamp: "2024-01-15T14:30:22Z"
checkpoint_created: true
type: git_stash
scope:
  files:
    - "src/api/handlers/user.py"
    - "src/api/handlers/auth.py"
    - "tests/test_handlers.py"
  state_keys: []
restore_command: "git stash pop stash@{0}"
expiry: null
pre_mutation_state:
  hash: "sha256:e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855"
  summary: "3 files, 342 lines total, last modified 2024-01-15"
next_safe_actions:
  - "execute: Proceed with handler refactoring"
  - "mutate: Modify files in scope"
confidence: 1.0
evidence_anchors:
  - "tool:bash:git stash push -m 'checkpoint:chk_20240115_143022_a7b3c9:Before refactoring API handlers'"
  - "tool:bash:git stash list | head -1"
assumptions:
  - "Git repository is initialized and clean"
  - "No merge conflicts in working tree"

Evidence pattern: Git stash creation command output, stash list verification.


Example 2: File Backup Checkpoint

Input:

scope: "config/production.yaml"
metadata:
  reason: "Before config migration"
  checkpoint_type: file_backup
  expiry: "24h"

Output:

checkpoint_id: "chk_20240115_150000_config"
timestamp: "2024-01-15T15:00:00Z"
size: 3412
checkpoint_created: true
type: file_backup
scope:
  files:
    - "config/production.yaml"
  state_keys: []
restore_command: "cp .checkpoints/chk_20240115_150000_config/production.yaml config/production.yaml"
expiry: "2024-01-16T15:00:00Z"
pre_mutation_state:
  hash: "sha256:abc123..."
  summary: "1 file, 89 lines, production database config"
next_safe_actions:
  - "mutate: Apply config migration"
confidence: 0.95
evidence_anchors:
  - "file:.checkpoints/chk_20240115_150000_config/manifest.json"
  - "tool:bash:sha256sum config/production.yaml"
assumptions:
  - ".checkpoints directory exists and is writable"

Verification

Apply the following verification patterns:

  • State Assertion: pre_mutation_state.hash can be recomputed and matches
  • Restore Command Valid: restore_command executes without error (dry-run if possible)
  • Scope Complete: All files in scope are captured in checkpoint
  • Evidence Grounding: checkpoint_id appears in evidence_anchors

Verification tools: Bash (for hash verification), Read (for manifest)

Safety Constraints

  • mutation: true (creates checkpoint artifacts)
  • requires_checkpoint: false (this IS the checkpoint operation)
  • requires_approval: false
  • risk: low

Capability-specific rules:

  • NEVER skip checkpoint before mutate or send (CRITICAL)
  • NEVER delete checkpoints until explicitly requested
  • ALWAYS verify checkpoint integrity immediately after creation
  • Do not checkpoint sensitive files (.env, credentials) - warn and exclude
  • Store checkpoint metadata in .checkpoints/ within workspace
  • Include reason in checkpoint for audit trail

Composition Patterns

Commonly follows:

  • plan - After creating a plan, checkpoint before execution
  • critique - After reviewing risks, checkpoint before proceeding
  • constrain - After policy check passes, checkpoint before mutation

Commonly precedes:

  • mutate - REQUIRED: Never mutate without prior checkpoint (CAVR pattern)
  • execute - Checkpoint before a step that raises requires_checkpoint
  • send - REQUIRED: Checkpoint before external communications
  • rollback - REQUIRED: Rollback restores to a checkpoint

Anti-patterns:

  • CRITICAL: Never call mutate or send without prior checkpoint
  • CRITICAL: Never call rollback without valid checkpoint reference
  • Never checkpoint after mutation has started
  • Never delete checkpoint before verify confirms success

Workflow references:

  • See reference/composition_patterns.md#checkpoint-act-verify-rollback for CAVR pattern
  • See reference/composition_patterns.md#debug-code-change for checkpoint placement
  • See reference/composition_patterns.md#digital-twin-sync-loop for checkpoint in loops

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.