checkpoint
Skill73 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Maintain a thirty-second return point (CHECKPOINT.md) and a single-use handoff (HANDOFF.md) so any session can resume mid-goal without archaeology. Use when a large unit of work finishes, a session enters its closing stretch, when leaving instructions for the next session, or when resuming and the user asks where things stand.
91 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- TheLunchTrae/claude-code-configstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- flonat/flonat-researchtheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- jboczek/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AhmedMerza/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use aside, spinoff and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
TheKREATORSSkillaside
Answer a quick side question without interrupting or losing context from the current task. Resume work automatically after answering.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AhmedMerzaSkillspinoff
After a branch is finished, harvest the work it made CHEAP — the helper you wrote that four other sites now hand-roll, the plumbing that turned a deferred feature small, the pattern that just split the codebase in two. Produces a follow-up backlog (0–3 candidates, feeding /issue), NEVER commits on the current branch. Invoke with /spinoff at the tail of the chain — after /fix-review has settled the review findings, before the MR merges — or when the user asks \"what else should we do while we're here / what did this unlock / anything to follow up on\". This is ship-check's optional twin — that finds what's MISSING and blocks the merge; this finds what's now CHEAP and blocks nothing. Restraint-gated: \"nothing spun off\" is the common and correct answer, and a finding that would have been equally valid before this branch is not a finding.
Also in 3 projects that use this
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-export
Export instincts from project/global scope to a file
Also in 3 projects that use this
seek888Skillopen-gstack-browser
Launch GStack Browser — AI-controlled Chromium with the sidebar extension baked in. Opens a visible browser window where you can watch every action in real time. The sidebar shows a live activity feed and chat. Anti-bot stealth built in. Use when asked to "open gstack browser", "launch browser", "connect chrome", "open chrome", "real browser", "launch chrome", "side panel", or "control my browser". Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "show me the browser".
Also in 5 projects that use this
diego-tobalinaSkillbuild-fix
Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.
Also in 5 projects that use this
seek888Skilldesign-html
Design finalization: generates production-quality Pretext-native HTML/CSS. Works with approved mockups from /design-shotgun, CEO plans from /plan-ceo-review, design review context from /plan-design-review, or from scratch with a user description. Text actually reflows, heights are computed, layouts are dynamic. 30KB overhead, zero deps. Smart API routing: picks the right Pretext patterns for each design type. Use when: "finalize this design", "turn this into HTML", "build me a page", "implement this design", or after any planning skill. Proactively suggest when user has approved a design or has a plan ready. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "build the design", "code the mockup", "make it real".
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +2 more from TheKREATORS
- +2 more from seek888
Other versions91 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 91
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow★ 1.7ksame name
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit★ 808same name
- leonvanzyl/agentic-coding-starter-kit★ 447same name
- myICOR/myPKA★ 319same name
- hsantanna88/clo-author★ 262same name
- hugosantanna/clo-author★ 262same name
- sterlingcrispin/claude_slash_commands★ 200same name
- flonat/flonat-research★ 150same name
- josipjelic/orchestrated-project-template★ 96same name
- panayiotism/claude-harness★ 79same name
81 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- brain-initSkill
- decision-ledgerSkill
- doctorSkill
- goalSkill
- knowledge-baseSkill
- pinSkill
- proof-standardSkill
- recallSkill
- rehearsalSkill
- reportSkill
- researcherSkill
- scheduleSkill
- setupSkill
- skill-forgeSkill
- verify-gateSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 85 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 12
Update memory/CHECKPOINT.md whenever a large unit of work completes or the session is winding down.
- Very specific: line 41
Archive on every update: Before overwriting, copy the outgoing version to memory/checkpoints/{YYYYMMDD-HHMM}-<short-title>.md.
- Very specific: line 42
Index each file the first time it appears: When this skill first creates memory/CHECKPOINT.md, memory/checkpoints/, or memory/HANDOFF.md, …
- Very specific: line 55
If memory/HANDOFF.md exists, read it, absorb the orders, delete it.
- Very specific: line 56
Read memory/CHECKPOINT.md and brief the user in thirty seconds: the story, what's decided, what they owe a decision on, the next first …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 85 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Checkpoint — return in thirty seconds
A session ends; the work doesn't. Whoever returns — the user after a week, or a fresh session after a context reset — faces scrollback that no longer exists and a directory that doesn't explain itself. Reconstruction eats the first twenty minutes and gets details wrong. This skill keeps one file that makes return instant, and a second file that carries orders across the gap without letting them go stale.
CHECKPOINT.md — the return point
Update memory/CHECKPOINT.md whenever a large unit of work completes or the session is winding down. Five sections, always in this order:
# Checkpoint — <goal> — <YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM>
## The story so far
<Thirty seconds of reading, no more. What this work is and where it
stands, told to someone with zero context.>
## Decided
<Decisions confirmed since the last checkpoint — one line each, with
ledger ids where they exist.>
## Waiting on the user
<Decisions only the user can make, and the readings in force from
OPEN-QUESTIONS that are due a question — one line each, so they get asked
here, at the break, not mid-flow. Empty is a valid and welcome state.>
## Next first action
<ONE line, executable immediately without reading anything else.>
## Tried
<Approaches attempted that did not work, one line each with why.>Rules:
- Next first action is the load-bearing line. A cold session must be able to execute it before reading a single other file: concrete verb, concrete object, no prerequisite. "Continue the analysis" fails this test; "run the export script against the staging list and diff the counts" passes.
- Tried is a map of dead ends. An approach that failed and went unrecorded will be attempted again, in good faith, by a session that has no way to know better. One line per dead end — what was tried, why it didn't work.
- Archive on every update. Before overwriting, copy the outgoing version to
memory/checkpoints/{YYYYMMDD-HHMM}-<short-title>.md. That directory is append-only and sorts itself by filename — the full trail of how the work moved, at zero extra cost. - Index each file the first time it appears. When this skill first creates
memory/CHECKPOINT.md,memory/checkpoints/, ormemory/HANDOFF.md, add a row for it to the File map inmemory/00-INDEX.md— a file missing from the map is a file the next session never opens.
HANDOFF.md — single-use, then destroyed
Concrete instructions aimed at the next session — "start with X, skip Y, the open question about Z is resolved" — go to memory/HANDOFF.md, not the checkpoint. The two files differ in lifespan, and the difference is the point:
CHECKPOINT.mddescribes state. It is always current and always present.HANDOFF.mdcarries orders. It is read exactly once: the session that reads it acts on it and deletes it immediately. A handoff that outlives its reading turns into an old instruction wearing the authority of a current one — the delete is what keeps the file trustworthy.
Returning
On resume — new session, context reset, or the user asking where things stand:
- If
memory/HANDOFF.mdexists, read it, absorb the orders, delete it. - Read
memory/CHECKPOINT.mdand brief the user in thirty seconds: the story, what's decided, what they owe a decision on, the next first action. - Scan for unfinished signals: work whose start is recorded (session log, open questions) but whose conclusion is nowhere. Surface each one — never let it dissolve silently. Include the readings in force: one relied on again since the last checkpoint is due its question in this briefing.
Then execute the next first action, unless the user redirects.
Part of ballast — foundations first, every solved path kept, done means checks pass.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

