chaos-engineering
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Design and run controlled chaos experiments to validate system resilience. Use when validating failure modes, running gameday exercises, testing recovery procedures, or building a chaos testing program. Must NOT be invoked during active production incidents. Trigger keywords: chaos engineering, chaos experiment, gameday, game day, fault injection, resilience testing, failure mode, what happens if, kill pod, simulate failure, disaster recovery test, DR test, resilience validation, failure scenario, blast radius test, dependency failure, region failure.
13 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- darkweb19/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jason0971/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Cure-Consulting-Group/ProductEngineeringSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- petrkindlmann/qa-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- jars-demo/jars-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collectiontheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 13
- petrkindlmann/qa-skills★ 209same name
- samsantosb/ship-it★ 37same name
- nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection★ 33same name
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
- an8079/take-skills★ 4same name
- Cure-Consulting-Group/ProductEngineeringSkills★ 3same name
- csiddhant796-blip/claude-skills-collection★ 2same name
- ffsshhttiikk/opencode-agents-skills★ 2same name
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skills★ 2same name
- jason0971/skills★ 1same name
3 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- capacity-planningSkill
- cost-optimizationSkill
- deployment-safetySkill
- iac-reviewSkill
- import-rcaSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- knowledge-captureSkill
- observabilitySkill
- oncall-handoffSkill
- oncall-runbookSkill
- postmortemSkill
- production-readiness-reviewSkill
- rca-summarySkill
- rfcSkill
- root-cause-analysisSkill
- runbook-generatorSkill
- security-postureSkill
- slo-monitoringSkill
- toil-trackingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 20
Before loading context files, check if context/CONTEXT.md exists in the current directory.
- Distinctive: line 32
Use the answers inline for this session.
- Distinctive: line 41
Before any other step, verify:
- Distinctive: line 42
Ask: "Is there currently an active P0 or P1 incident?" If yes: stop immediately.
- Distinctive: line 44
Ask: "Has this experiment been approved by the on-call engineer and engineering manager?"
- Distinctive: line 47
Only proceed if all three are satisfied.
- Very specific: line 52
Read context/CONTEXT.md and context/company/tech-stack.md.
- Distinctive: line 55
Before designing the experiment, assess the maximum possible impact:
- Distinctive: line 76
Every experiment must have a clear, falsifiable hypothesis:
- Distinctive: line 160
Never run chaos experiments during business peak hours without a compelling reason.
- Distinctive: line 161
Every experiment needs an abort condition — define it before starting.
- Distinctive: line 162
Start small: a single pod kill is more valuable than a full region failure as a first experiment.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Chaos Engineering Skill
Setup Check
Before loading context files, check if context/CONTEXT.md exists in the current directory.
If context/CONTEXT.md exists — read it and proceed normally.
If context/CONTEXT.md does not exist — this skill was installed standalone (e.g. via npx skills add). Ask the user these questions before proceeding:
- Role —
junior-sre/senior-sre/sre-manager(shapes output depth and tone) - Cloud provider —
aws/gcp/azure/on-prem/hybrid - Observability stack — e.g. Datadog, Prometheus+Grafana, New Relic
- Company name and primary services affected (if relevant to this task)
Use the answers inline for this session. For persistent setup across all skills, suggest:
pipx install sre-agent
sre-agent initInstructions
Step 0: Safety Gate (MANDATORY)
Before any other step, verify:
- Ask: "Is there currently an active P0 or P1 incident?" If yes: stop immediately. "Chaos experiments must not run during active incidents. Resolve the incident first."
- Ask: "Has this experiment been approved by the on-call engineer and engineering manager?"
- Confirm: "What is the rollback/abort procedure if this experiment goes wrong?"
Only proceed if all three are satisfied.
Step 1: Load Context
Read context/CONTEXT.md and context/company/tech-stack.md.
Step 2: Blast Radius Assessment
Before designing the experiment, assess the maximum possible impact:
Scope questions:
- Which services are in scope for the experiment?
- Which services have a dependency on in-scope services (blast radius)?
- What percentage of users could be affected if the experiment escapes its scope?
- Is there a way to limit the experiment to a subset of users or a single region?
- What is the recovery time if something goes wrong (RTO)?
Blast radius classification:
| Class | Scope | User impact possible |
| Contained | Single pod / replica | < 1% |
| Service | Entire service | Feature-level |
| Platform | Cluster / DB | Major degradation |
| Multi-service | Cross-service | Potential P0 |
Rule: Only run Class "Contained" or "Service" experiments in production without explicit VP Engineering approval.
Step 3: Define the Hypothesis
Every experiment must have a clear, falsifiable hypothesis:
Hypothesis template:
"We believe that [service] will [behavior] when [failure condition],
because [reason], and we will verify this by [measurement]."
Example:
"We believe that the checkout-api will continue processing orders
within its normal SLO when the inventory-service is unavailable,
because checkout-api has a circuit breaker configured with a 30-second
timeout and a cached fallback, and we will verify this by measuring
the checkout error rate and latency during the experiment."Step 4: Define Steady State
Establish measurable baseline before the experiment:
Steady state metrics (measure 10 minutes before starting):
- checkout error rate: <0.1%
- checkout P99 latency: <500ms
- order creation success rate: >99.9%Step 5: Design the Experiment
Choose the failure injection type:
| Failure type | What it tests | Common tool |
| Pod kill | Service resilience, restart recovery | kubectl delete pod |
| Network partition | Dependency failure handling | Chaos Mesh, tc |
| Latency injection | Timeout handling, circuit breakers | Chaos Mesh, Toxiproxy |
| Resource exhaustion | Saturation handling | stress-ng, Chaos Mesh |
| Region failure | Multi-region failover | Route53 health checks, simulated |
| Dependency failure | Fallback and graceful degradation | Chaos Mesh |
Design output:
Experiment: checkout-api circuit breaker validation
Failure injection:
Tool: Chaos Mesh
Target: inventory-service, all pods, production namespace
Failure type: network partition (100% packet drop)
Duration: 5 minutes
Monitoring:
- Watch: checkout error rate (expect: <1%)
- Watch: checkout P99 latency (expect: <1s with cache fallback)
- Watch: circuit breaker open state in Datadog
Abort conditions:
- checkout error rate > 5% → abort immediately
- any other service shows unexpected degradation → abort
- experiment duration > 10 minutes without resolution → abort
Rollback:
- Remove Chaos Mesh network policy
- Verify inventory-service connectivity restored
- Confirm checkout metrics return to steady stateStep 6: Generate the Gameday Runbook
Produce a gameday document with:
- Experiment hypothesis
- Steady state definition
- Timeline (when each step happens, who does what)
- Monitoring checklist
- Abort conditions and rollback procedure
- Success/failure criteria
- Observation notes section
Step 7: Post-Experiment Analysis
After the experiment:
- Did steady state hold? (Hypothesis confirmed or refuted?)
- What surprises occurred?
- What did the experiment reveal about the system?
- Generate action items for gaps discovered.
Guidelines
- Never run chaos experiments during business peak hours without a compelling reason.
- Every experiment needs an abort condition — define it before starting.
- Start small: a single pod kill is more valuable than a full region failure as a first experiment.
- "It worked" is not a result — document what metrics confirmed it worked.
- Persona (junior-sre): read-only participation only; do not design or run experiments without senior supervision.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

