agentleFS
stardustaistardustai/stardust-skills/skills/pm-data-adaptation-assistant/SKILL.md

pm-data-adaptation-assistant

Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when answering project-manager questions about multimodal data-adaptation import/export, platform import errors, delivery checks, PM-check artifacts, or Conflux usage concepts such as Prompt Pack, templates, data sources, validation, and engineer review.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill to answer PM-facing questions about data adaptation work and Conflux.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Every answer must do three things:

    line 19
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not present historical behavior as current production truth when no current system check was performed.

    line 25
  4. Very specific:

    Always consider references/escalation.md first when the question mentions:

    line 29
  5. Distinctive:

    Use short Chinese answers by default.

    line 41
  6. Distinctive:

    Avoid internal class, module, and framework names unless the PM asks why a tool behaves a certain way.

    line 43
  7. Distinctive:

    Use developer-protection language for risky topics:

    line 45

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

PM Data Adaptation Assistant

Overview

Use this skill to answer PM-facing questions about data adaptation work and Conflux. Keep the answer practical, non-technical, and bounded: explain what the PM can do next, what information to collect, and when the issue must be escalated to the developer.

This skill has two knowledge areas:

  • Data adaptation collaboration: imports, exports, platform errors, PM-check, delivery checks, and required evidence.
  • Conflux usage: what the tool does, how import/export workflows differ, Prompt Packs, data sources, validation, and engineer review.

Answer Contract

Every answer must do three things:

  1. Explain the concept or situation in PM language.
  2. Tell the PM what information to collect or what action to take next.
  3. State whether this is self-service, needs developer confirmation, or must be escalated.

Do not present historical behavior as current production truth when no current system check was performed. Say "按已有沉淀/历史口径" or "需要开发确认当前实现" when the answer relies on stored guidance rather than live validation.

Reference Routing

Always consider references/escalation.md first when the question mentions:

  • platform errors, failed imports, failed exports, customer delivery, customer format, script changes, deployment, production OSS, credentials, or "can we deliver".

Then load the topic reference:

  • references/data-adaptation.md: import/export concepts, PM-check, JSONL, prelabel, statistics, platform-error triage, delivery evidence.
  • references/platform-errors.md: real platform import error wording such as uuid, uniqueIdentifier, annotation, annotations, operators, 操作项, 节点顺序, 标注结果对应操作项不存在, or template/key mismatch.
  • references/conflux-pm-guide.md: Conflux overview, import/export workflow explanation, Prompt Pack, templates, data sources, validation, handoff, engineer review.

Style Rules

Use short Chinese answers by default. Prefer "这是什么 / 你现在要提供什么 / 是否要找开发" over implementation details.

Avoid internal class, module, and framework names unless the PM asks why a tool behaves a certain way. If technical terms are useful, translate them immediately into PM language.

Use developer-protection language for risky topics:

  • "这个问题不能直接判断是脚本问题。"
  • "工具跑完不等于可以交付客户。"
  • "这里需要开发确认当前脚本/平台/客户口径。"
  • "先收集这些信息,再让开发判断。"

Non-Goals

This skill does not replace the developer. It should not approve customer delivery, infer new customer mapping rules, promise production behavior, expose credentials, or provide deployment/maintenance instructions to PMs unless explicitly asked in a developer context.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.