reflect
Skill1 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub
Run NanoClaw's read-only execution-health digest. Use when the operator says "reflect", "self-improve", "review how the agents are doing", "where are we wasting tokens", or asks about agent cost, failures, cache efficiency, compactions, tool loops, or skill reliability. On-demand only; never schedule it and never change config or code as part of this skill.
172 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphustheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Loner1024/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- caidanw/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecodetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- endqwerty/endstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- tristanphvn/keeltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use poteto-help, setup-pstack and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ianclearySkillpoteto-help
Guides users through pstack setup, /poteto-mode, and picking the skill, playbook, or principle for a task. Type /poteto-help with a question.
Also in 14 projects that use this
bnemaSkillsetup-pstack
Configure which Pi models pstack uses per role. Detects available provider/model specs and writes pstack's user configuration. Use for /setup-pstack, "configure pstack models", or changing pstack model choices.
Also in 24 projects that use this
eryzerzSkillmake-bot-ui
Use when building a custom UI (page, dashboard, buttons) that should wake a Grok Bot over a webhook, when the user must provide a webhook sender key, or when exposing that UI on Tailscale.
Also in 19 projects that use this
ianclearySkillprinciple-explain-the-number
Apply before you trust, report, or act on a number you measured: a speedup, a regression, a throughput, a latency, or an eval result. Find what limits it, and rule out that it measured something other than the work you think.
Also in 26 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillautomate-me
Use when the user wants working preferences captured in a reusable mode skill.
Also in 39 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillpoteto-mode
Use when non-trivial work should follow the smallest rigorous Jstack workflow.
Also in 27 projects that use this
- +6 more from jaydubya818
Other versions172 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 172
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- github/gh-aw★ 5.6ksame name
- backnotprop/pstack★ 3.8ksame name
- github/squad★ 3.4ksame name
- rilldata/rill★ 3ksame name
- microsoft/waza★ 1.5ksame name
- llama-farm/llamafarm★ 837same name
- haddock-development/claude-reflect-system★ 373same name
- egregore-labs/egregore★ 293same name
162 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository54 other files it gives its agents.
- container/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- container/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- add-atomic-chat-toolSkill
- add-codexSkill
- add-dashboardSkill
- add-deltachatSkill
- add-discordSkill
- add-emacsSkill
- add-gcal-toolSkill
- add-gchatSkill
- add-githubSkill
- add-gmail-toolSkill
- add-imessageSkill
- add-karpathy-llm-wikiSkill
- add-linearSkill
- add-macos-statusbarSkill
- add-matrixSkill
- add-mnemonSkill
- add-ollama-providerSkill
- add-ollama-toolSkill
- add-opencodeSkill
- add-piSkill
- add-resendSkill
- add-rtkSkill
- add-signalSkill
- add-slackSkill
- add-teamsSkill
- add-telegramSkill
- add-vercelSkill
- add-webexSkill
- add-wechatSkill
- add-whatsapp-cloudSkill
- add-whatsappSkill
- archive-tripSkill
- customizeSkill
- debugSkill
- get-qodo-rulesSkill
- init-first-agentSkill
- init-onecliSkill
- learnSkill
- manage-channelsSkill
- manage-mountsSkill
- migrate-from-openclawSkill
- migrate-from-v1Skill
- migrate-memorySkill
- migrate-nanoclawSkill
- nano-pvt-hubSkill
- new-knowledge-graph-tutorSkill
- new-tripSkill
- qodo-pr-resolverSkill
- setupSkill
- update-nanoclawSkill
- update-skillsSkill
- use-native-credential-proxySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 163 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Read existing traces and Ops Center data only.
- Distinctive: line 14
Do not edit instructions, skills, config, or source.
- Distinctive: line 15
Do not create proposals, schedules, reminders, or background jobs.
- Very specific: line 16
Do not write data/reflect-improvements.json.
- Distinctive: line 19
Treat "no action indicated" as a successful result.
- Distinctive: line 96
Do not turn the inspection step into an implementation plan unless the operator separately asks for one.
- Distinctive: line 107
Do not update it during diagnosis.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 163 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Reflect — read-only execution health
This skill diagnoses. It does not propose a change merely because a metric was printed, and it never applies one.
Contract
- Read existing traces and Ops Center data only.
- Do not edit instructions, skills, config, or source.
- Do not create proposals, schedules, reminders, or background jobs.
- Do not write
data/reflect-improvements.json. The digest reads that history, but only a separately approved repair workflow may update it withscripts/reflect-ledger.ts. - Treat "no action indicated" as a successful result.
- Distinguish complete evidence from missing evidence. An empty report with partial evidence is inconclusive, not healthy.
Run
pnpm run reflect digest --days 7Optional:
pnpm run reflect digest --days 14
pnpm run reflect digest --group <agent-group-id>
pnpm run reflect digest --jsonThe command itself makes no model calls and opens ops.db read-only.
Ops Center's Reflect and System tabs have a Run /reflect control that invokes the
same digest engine with an authenticated, user-triggered request. It keeps the
latest bounded result in data/reflect-latest.json and shows a compact summary
there after reloads. The request does not write an ops.db event or change config.
Interpret
Start with EVIDENCE.
complete: an empty signal list means no conservative threshold fired.partial: report the missing source and stop short of a health conclusion.
Then summarize:
- Outcomes: ok, degraded, failed, idle.
- Observed cost per priced working workflow and per successful result.
- High and medium signals, with the arithmetic already provided.
- The smallest set of exhibits that explains those signals.
- Any matching improvement-history entry, especially one already verified or later marked regressed.
Reflect reports workflows, not raw provider prompt phases. One workflow starts with the operator's request and may include provider-injected skill prompts and context-compaction resumes. The Runs page retains those raw turns for debugging.
Tool health distinguishes:
- unresolved errors, which can indicate real breakage; and
- recovered errors, where a later successful tool call and visible workflow response conservatively indicate recovery. These are retry tax, not proof that the integration failed.
Recovery is a deterministic correlation, not semantic proof. Use the linked signal-specific exhibits and source traces before assigning a root cause.
The digest looks for:
- failed workflows that consumed work but produced no visible response, while treating successfully acknowledged outbound actions as response evidence;
- low prompt-cache hit ratio;
- frequent compaction or rising context;
- scheduled/wake work costing much more than chat;
- repeated identical tool calls;
- tool errors or latency degradation;
- skills repeatedly associated with degraded/failed workflows;
- enabled skills not observed in active groups, reported only as candidates for inspection.
Report
Give the operator:
- whether the evidence was complete;
- the two or three most important findings, or "no action indicated";
- the relevant group, metric, and exhibit;
- what to inspect next.
Do not turn the inspection step into an implementation plan unless the operator separately asks for one. If a real breakage is found, follow the repository's root-cause and approval rules before any fix.
Improvement history handoff
The durable history is data/reflect-improvements.json. Reflect reads it and
links current signal ids to prior diagnoses, repairs, verification, or
regressions. This prevents a future investigation from rediscovering the same
issue without context.
Do not update it during diagnosis. After the operator separately approves a repair and the repair has been verified, the implementation workflow may create a validated entry JSON and explicitly run:
pnpm exec tsx scripts/reflect-ledger.ts record --entry /tmp/reflect-improvement-entry.jsonRecord the stable signal ids, root cause, introducing commit when known, changed
files, verification, and before/after metrics. Use status: "regressed" when a
previously verified issue returns rather than creating a duplicate diagnosis.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

