agentleFS
sruthir28sruthir28/enterprise-ai-skills/workshop-designer/SKILL.md

workshop-designer

Skill136 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Design a half-day or full-day strategy workshop that ends with a committed decision and named owners — not a "great discussion" with no artifact. Outputs an hour-by-hour agenda, breakout prompts with expected outputs, pre-reads, facilitator playbook for when things go sideways, and the post-workshop artifact that justifies the day. Use for offsites, leadership alignment sessions, kickoff workshops, planning meetings >2 hours.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Facilitator plays referee, not participant: If you have a stake in the decision, you can't facilitate.

    line 21
  2. Distinctive:

    Write the facilitator script: Not the slides — the verbatim framing for each transition.

    line 89
  3. Distinctive:

    One outcome: Leave with a Q3 strategy-on-a-page signed off by all 12.

    line 98

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Workshop Designer

Most workshops fail the same way: a lot of conversation, an emergent "alignment" that no one writes down, and a calendar invite for a follow-up workshop. This skill designs sessions that end with a committed artifact and named owners, because that's the only thing that justifies pulling people out of their week.

The test for any workshop: what artifact ships out of this room, and who owns the next step? If you can't answer, don't run the workshop.


Design choices

  • One outcome, not three. A workshop with three goals achieves zero. Force-rank to one decision or one artifact.
  • Diverge then converge, never both at once. Brainstorm sessions and decision sessions are different brain modes. Mixing them creates "discussion" that converges on nothing.
  • Breakouts < 4 people. Above 4, one person dominates. Report-backs < 5 min each, or you lose the room.
  • Energy curve matters. Heavy thinking morning, application + decisions afternoon. Never schedule a decision moment right after lunch.
  • The artifact is the deliverable, not the meeting. Pre-build the template; the workshop fills it in. Leaving "we'll write it up later" is how alignment evaporates by Tuesday.
  • Facilitator plays referee, not participant. If you have a stake in the decision, you can't facilitate. Pick one or the other.

Inputs needed (interview if missing)

  1. Workshop goal — one sentence. "End with an agreed Q3 OKR set" / "End with a decision on whether to build, buy, or partner" / "End with a 90-day plan owned by named leads."
  2. Attendees. Names + roles. Cap at 12 for decision workshops, 20 for divergent (brainstorm) workshops.
  3. Duration. Half-day (4 hrs incl. break), full-day (6–7 hrs incl. lunch + breaks). Multi-day = different format.
  4. What's already decided going in. Constraints, locked-in choices. Surface these upfront so people don't re-litigate them.
  5. What's open. The actual decision space.
  6. What the artifact is. The thing that leaves the room. (Strategy on a page, OKRs, decision memo, prioritized roadmap, etc.)
  7. Who facilitates. Internal (cheaper, has context) or external (neutral, harder to derail).

Output format

1. Workshop charter (1 page, pre-read)

  • The one outcome
  • Decisions in scope vs. out of scope
  • Attendee list with role in the workshop (decider / contributor / observer)
  • Required pre-work

2. Hour-by-hour agenda

TimeBlockModeOutputOwner
9:00Frame + outcomePlenaryShared understanding of one outcomeFacilitator
9:15Constraints recapPlenaryLocked items on the wall, no debateSponsor
9:30Divergent: option generationBreakout (3s)5–8 options per groupBreakouts
10:30Report-back + clusterPlenaryOne synthesized list, ~12 optionsFacilitator
11:00Break———
11:15Convergent: rank optionsPlenary, dot-voteTop 3 optionsAll
12:00Lunch———
1:00Deep-dive top optionBreakout (5–6)Filled-in decision templateSub-team
2:30Plenary review + decidePlenaryGo / no-go + ownerAll
3:00Wrap + commitmentsPlenaryNamed owners, dates, next stepFacilitator
3:30Done—Filled artifact in hand—

3. Breakout playbook

For each breakout: the prompt (one question), expected output (concrete deliverable), time (strict), roles (timekeeper, scribe, reporter).

4. Facilitator's "what if" notes

The 5 things that go wrong and what to do:

  • "One exec dominates" → name it, rotate to round-robin
  • "Group can't converge in the convergent block" → cut to 2 options, force a coin-flip-or-rationale framing
  • "New constraint surfaces mid-day" → park it on a 'parking lot' wall, re-decide if it changes the call
  • "Sponsor changes the goal mid-workshop" → pause, get the new outcome in writing, ask the room if it still works
  • "Pre-reads weren't read" → 10 min silent reading of the 1-page summary, skip the original frame block

5. The artifact template

The thing the workshop fills in. Pre-built. Examples:

  • Strategy on a page (Aspiration / Where to play / How to win / Capabilities / Mgmt systems)
  • Q3 OKR set (3 objectives, 3 KRs each, owners)
  • Decision memo (Context / Options / Recommendation / Risks / Ask)

6. Post-workshop send (24-hour SLA)

What goes out within 24 hrs: the artifact + the commitments table (who owns what by when). Drafted before the workshop, populated during.


Process

  1. Lock the one outcome. Push back on multi-outcome workshops. Run two days or one workshop and a follow-up.
  2. Design the artifact first. Reverse-engineer the agenda from what the artifact needs.
  3. Plot the energy curve. Heavy thinking 10am–12pm, decision 2pm–3pm, never after lunch directly.
  4. Mode-tag every block: divergent / convergent / plenary / breakout. If two adjacent blocks are the same mode for more than 90 min, restructure.
  5. Write the facilitator script. Not the slides — the verbatim framing for each transition. "We just spent an hour generating options. Now we're going to converge to three. The criterion is X. Each person gets 3 dots."
  6. Pre-build the "what if" playbook. Workshops go sideways for the same 5 reasons.
  7. Calendar the post-send before the workshop. 24-hr SLA for the artifact. If you don't pre-commit, it slips.

Worked example

Workshop: Align the 12-person leadership team on Q3 strategic priorities. One outcome: Leave with a Q3 strategy-on-a-page signed off by all 12. Duration: Full day, 9:00–3:30. Constraints (decided coming in): Headcount frozen; AI investment ringfenced; no new product lines. Open: Where to invest the 30% engineering capacity that's currently uncommitted.

Pre-reads (sent 5 days before)

  • Q2 retrospective: top 3 wins, top 3 misses (1 page)
  • 6 candidate investment areas with 1-paragraph cases each (3 pages)
  • Strategy-on-a-page template, pre-filled with locked items (1 page)

Agenda

TimeBlockModeOutput
9:00Frame: today we leave with the strategy-on-a-page filled. The one open question: where do we point the uncommitted 30% capacity?PlenaryShared frame
9:15Q2 reflect: 1 win + 1 miss from each leader (1 min each, no discussion)PlenaryPublic reflection, surfaces what's on people's minds
9:45Breakouts of 3: rank the 6 candidate investments + propose 1 outside the pre-readBreakout4 ranked lists
10:30Report-back + clusterPlenaryOne unified list, ~7 options
11:00Break
11:15Silent dot-voting: each leader gets 5 dots, places on the 7 optionsConvergentTop 3 emerge
11:45Devil's advocate: 1 person assigned to argue against each of the top 3PlenaryStress-tested top 3
12:15Lunch
1:15Breakouts of 4: each group takes one of the top 3 and fills in a 1-page "what this looks like in Q3" (investment, expected outcome, risks)Breakout3 filled 1-pagers
2:30Plenary: choose 1 (or up to 2 if separable)ConvergentDecision
2:45Fill in the strategy-on-a-page live on screenPlenaryArtifact complete
3:15Commitments: named owner for each Q3 priority, kickoff datePlenaryOwners table
3:30WrapArtifact + commitments in hand

Facilitator's "what if"

  • Most likely failure: group can't converge to 1 in the 2:30 block. Pre-decide: if no 70% consensus by 2:45, sponsor (CEO) gets the tie-breaker. Communicate this upfront so it's not a surprise.
  • Second risk: Q2 retrospective opens old wounds. Time-box hard, no rebuttals, facilitator interrupts if anyone goes >90 sec.
  • Third risk: someone re-litigates the headcount freeze. Point at the wall ("locked items"), defer to a different forum.

Post-workshop send (drafted before, populated during)

Email within 24 hours, subject: "Q3 strategy: locked. What you own."

  • Strategy on a page (attached PDF, photo of physical version on the wall)
  • Commitments table: each leader's Q3 priority owner-name + first milestone date
  • Next sync: 2-week check-in with this same group

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Multi-outcome workshops. "Alignment + brainstorm + decisions" = none of the three. Pick one.
  • No artifact template. "We'll write it up" = it doesn't get written up. Pre-build.
  • Schedule fills, work doesn't. Tight timeboxes feel good but don't generate output. Build in 15 min of slippage per major block.
  • Mixing divergent and convergent. "Let's brainstorm options and pick the best one in 45 min" produces neither good options nor a defensible pick.
  • Decision moment right after lunch. Energy nadir. Schedule application work there, not commitment.
  • >4 in a breakout. Loud voice dominates. Always split into 3s or 4s.
  • No "what if" playbook. Workshops sideways predictably. Have the moves ready.
  • The sponsor facilitates. They have a stake — they'll bias the room. Pick a neutral facilitator or rotate someone external in.

When to use

  • Leadership offsites (half-day or full-day)
  • Quarterly planning sessions
  • Strategy resets after a major change
  • Kickoff workshops for cross-functional initiatives
  • M&A integration alignment
  • Any working session > 2 hours

When NOT to use

  • Recurring meetings (use a different format)
  • Status updates (workshop is too much; use an async memo)
  • 1:1s, small group decisions <5 people (use Meeting Prep Kit)
  • Trainings (different design — facilitation vs. learning are different jobs)

Pairs well with

  • Meeting Prep Kit — pre-workshop 1:1s with key attendees to map stances; reduces in-room surprises
  • Stakeholder Map — map the room before designing the agenda; the breakouts you design depend on who's in the room
  • Decision Memo Builder — the artifact that leaves a decision workshop is often a decision memo
  • Storyline Builder — pre-reads structured as a storyline land better than narrative pre-reads

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.