agentleFS
sruthir28sruthir28/enterprise-ai-skills/scpr-framework/SKILL.md

scpr-framework

Skill136 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

SCPR (Situation-Complication-Problem-Recommendation) framework for structured problem solving and executive communication. Use when users need to structure strategic arguments, analyze business situations, create executive summaries, or develop clear problem statements using McKinsey-style communication. Apply when structuring recommendations, writing memos, or organizing strategic thinking.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Must be specific and answerable

    line 25
  2. Distinctive:

    Start with Situation (establish baseline)

    line 75
  3. Distinctive:

    Test Problem for specificity

    line 82
  4. Distinctive:

    Verify Recommendations are MECE

    line 83
  5. Distinctive:

    Add timelines if missing

    line 84
  6. Distinctive:

    Situation too detailed: Keep to essential context only

    line 95
  7. Distinctive:

    Overlapping Recommendations: Ensure MECE structure

    line 98
  8. Distinctive:

    No timelines: Always include "by when" in Recommendations

    line 99

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

SCPR Framework

A structured approach to problem-solving and executive communication used in management consulting.

Framework Components

S - Situation: Current state of the market/business

  • What is the lay of the land?
  • Establish baseline context
  • Describe the stable environment before changes

C - Complication: Recent shift or change

  • What has changed recently?
  • New market dynamics (AI boom, regulatory changes, competitive threats)
  • The catalyst that creates urgency

P - Problem: Crisp question to solve

  • What specific strategic question must be answered?
  • Common examples: "How to grow revenue?", "How to enter new market?", "How to reduce costs?"
  • Must be specific and answerable

R - Recommendation: Proposed actions

  • What should be done and by when?
  • Priority actions to address the problem
  • Can be structured as issue tree branches (doesn't have to be only high-priority items)
  • Specific, actionable, time-bound

Core Principles

MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive)

  • Recommendations should not overlap
  • Together they should cover all necessary actions
  • Each recommendation addresses distinct aspect of the problem

Clarity

  • Each section should be concise
  • Problem statement must be answerable
  • Recommendations must be actionable

Example: Tech Startup Product Pivot

Situation Series B SaaS startup with $15M ARR selling project management software to creative agencies and marketing firms. Product focuses on task management, resource allocation, and client collaboration. 200 agency customers with average contract size $75K. Historically strong product-market fit with 25% YoY growth and 90% gross retention.

Complication AI-powered tools like ChatGPT, Notion AI, and Claude emerging as workflow automation alternatives. Customer usage metrics declining 15% over last 6 months. Exit interviews reveal agencies using AI for project briefs, status updates, and resource planning - core features of current product. Three enterprise deals ($500K pipeline) paused citing "evaluating AI-first solutions."

Problem How should we reposition the product and business model to return to 25%+ growth within 12 months while competing against general-purpose AI tools?

Recommendations

  1. Product: Launch AI-native workflow engine by Q2 2025
    • Integrate LLM for automated project scoping and task breakdown
    • AI-powered resource matching based on skills and availability
    • Differentiate on agency-specific context (brand guidelines, client history, creative workflows)
  2. Positioning: Shift from "project management" to "AI-augmented agency operations" by Q1 2025
    • Rebrand messaging around AI that understands agency workflows
    • Emphasize integration advantages over general tools
    • Target gap: ChatGPT lacks agency-specific memory and processes
  3. Pricing: Introduce usage-based AI tier by Q2 2025
    • Base platform remains flat fee ($75K)
    • AI features charged per automation/generation
    • Capture value from high-usage customers, protect downside

Usage Patterns

When creating SCPR structure:

  1. Start with Situation (establish baseline)
  2. Identify Complication (what changed?)
  3. Frame Problem as specific question
  4. Develop MECE Recommendations with timeline

When analyzing existing content:

  1. Extract facts into S/C/P/R categories
  2. Test Problem for specificity
  3. Verify Recommendations are MECE
  4. Add timelines if missing

When reviewing SCPR:

  • Is Situation necessary context only (not exhaustive)?
  • Is Complication recent and urgent?
  • Is Problem answerable and specific?
  • Are Recommendations mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive?
  • Does each Recommendation include "by when"?

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Situation too detailed: Keep to essential context only
  • Complication = Problem: They're different. Complication is "what changed", Problem is "what question to solve"
  • Vague Problem: "Improve business" is too broad. "Increase revenue 40% in 12 months" is specific
  • Overlapping Recommendations: Ensure MECE structure
  • No timelines: Always include "by when" in Recommendations

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.