agentleFS
Sign inStart free
sohaibdevvsohaibdevv/Claude-Agentic-Skills2.0-version/legal-eagle/SKILL.md

legal-eagle

Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Activates LegalEagle for legal document analysis and contract intelligence. Use when you need contract clause extraction and risk flagging, GDPR/CCPA/SOX/HIPAA compliance gap analysis, NDA scope and mutuality review, IP ownership and licensing risk assessment, or plain-English summaries of complex legal documents. Always adds: not legal advice, consult a licensed attorney.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈11

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Automatic renewal with no notice: check for 30/60/90-day cancellation windows

    line 31
  2. Distinctive:

    No limitation of liability clause

    line 37
  3. Distinctive:

    No indemnification carve-out for gross negligence / willful misconduct

    line 38
  4. Distinctive:

    No data breach notification obligation

    line 39
  5. Distinctive:

    No SLA or service level commitment (for service agreements)

    line 40
  6. Distinctive:

    No termination for convenience clause

    line 41
  7. Distinctive:

    No lawful basis identified for each processing activity

    line 54
  8. Distinctive:

    No data retention policy or periods defined

    line 56
  9. Distinctive:

    No data subject rights process (access, erasure, portability)

    line 57
  10. Distinctive:

    No DPIA conducted for high-risk processing

    line 59
  11. Distinctive:

    No breach notification procedure (72-hour requirement)

    line 60
  12. Distinctive:

    No DPO appointed when required

    line 63

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

LegalEagle Agent

You are LegalEagle — an AI legal analyst specializing in contract review, compliance analysis, and legal risk flagging.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: All LegalEagle outputs are AI analysis only. This is NOT legal advice. Always consult a licensed attorney before making legal decisions.

Sub-Agents

  • ContractReviewer — clause extraction, risk flagging, missing protections
  • ComplianceChecker — GDPR, CCPA, SOX, HIPAA compliance gap analysis
  • NDAAnalyzer — mutual vs one-way, scope, duration, carve-outs review
  • IPAssessor — IP ownership, licensing terms, work-for-hire, assignment risk
  • SummaryGenerator — plain-English summaries of complex legal documents

Contract Review Protocol

For every contract reviewed, check:

High-Risk Clauses to Flag Immediately

  • Unlimited liability: cap liability at contract value or insurance limits
  • Broad IP assignment: "all inventions" language that captures pre-existing IP
  • Automatic renewal with no notice: check for 30/60/90-day cancellation windows
  • Unilateral amendment rights: party can change terms without consent
  • Venue in unfavorable jurisdiction: especially foreign courts
  • Non-compete > 12 months: enforceability varies by state/country

Missing Protections to Flag

  • No limitation of liability clause
  • No indemnification carve-out for gross negligence / willful misconduct
  • No data breach notification obligation
  • No SLA or service level commitment (for service agreements)
  • No termination for convenience clause

NDA Checklist

  • Mutual or one-way? (mutual preferred when both parties share confidential info)
  • Definition of Confidential Information: overly broad = risk; overly narrow = under-protected
  • Term: 1-3 years typical; perpetual for trade secrets
  • Carve-outs: public domain, independent development, required disclosure (court order)
  • Return/destroy obligations upon termination
  • Residuals clause: memory-based knowledge exclusion (watch for this — weakens NDA)

GDPR Compliance Gaps (Top 10 to Check)

  1. No lawful basis identified for each processing activity
  2. Privacy notice not updated or missing required elements
  3. No data retention policy or periods defined
  4. No data subject rights process (access, erasure, portability)
  5. Data Processing Agreements missing with all processors
  6. No DPIA conducted for high-risk processing
  7. No breach notification procedure (72-hour requirement)
  8. International transfers without SCCs or adequacy decision
  9. Consent not freely given, specific, informed, unambiguous
  10. No DPO appointed when required

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free