agent-smith
Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Activates the AgentSmith agent for multi-agent system design and orchestration. Use this skill when you need to design a multi-agent architecture (hierarchical, parallel, or sequential), build a semantic routing layer, design tool schemas for agent tool use, set up memory systems (short-term, long-term, episodic), or create evaluation frameworks for measuring agent performance and success rates.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- codebeltnet/agentictheir own version, first seen Oct 3, 2026
- vignesh2027/Claude-Agentic-Skills2.0-versionword for word, first seen May 20, 2026
- cyijun/agent-smiththeir own version, first seen Apr 30, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- vignesh2027/Claude-Agentic-Skills2.0-version★ 6100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- cyijun/agent-smith★ 25same name
- codebeltnet/agentic★ 3same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository121 other files it gives its agents.
- abtest-scientistSkill
- agentic-workflow-builderSkill
- agentOS-orchestratorSkill
- AIProductManagerSkill
- ai-red-teamerSkill
- APIDesignArchitectSkill
- api-integratorSkill
- arxiv-researcherSkill
- b2b-sales-playbookSkill
- biotech-analystSkill
- BoardDeckBuilderSkill
- business-intelligence-proSkill
- ceo-war-roomSkill
- cfo-intelligenceSkill
- churn-analystSkill
- claude-mythosSkill
- climate-tech-analystSkill
- CloudCostOptimizerSkill
- code-migratorSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- CommunityBuilderSkill
- compliance-aiSkill
- ContentOpsOSSkill
- content-research-writerSkill
- contract-drafterSkill
- CrisisIntelligenceSkill
- crypto-sageSkill
- CultureArchitectSkill
- CustomerInterviewAnalystSkill
- customer-successSkill
- cybersecurity-analystSkill
- database-geniusSkill
- data-governance-agentSkill
- data-pipeline-proSkill
- data-scientist-proSkill
- DataWarehouseArchitectSkill
- DesignSystemArchitectSkill
- developer-advocateSkill
- DeveloperExperienceOSSkill
- devops-commanderSkill
- document-processorSkill
- EngineeringManagerSkill
- EnterpriseSalesOSSkill
- esg-compassSkill
- finance-oracleSkill
- financial-model-builderSkill
- founder-to-ceoSkill
- github-intelligenceSkill
- GTMCommanderSkill
- growth-hackingSkill
- healthcare-analyticsSkill
- hr-analyticsSkill
- incident-commanderSkill
- innovation-catalystSkill
- insurance-actuarySkill
- knowledge-graph-builderSkill
- learning-coachSkill
- legal-eagleSkill
- load-testerSkill
- ma-dealmakerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 53
Always define tool schemas with:
- Distinctive: line 73
Use enum for fixed value sets
- Distinctive: line 74
Add examples in descriptions
- Distinctive: line 75
Keep parameters minimal — only what the tool needs
- Distinctive: line 82
Never store redundant information
- Distinctive: line 87
Use pgvector or Pinecone with cosine similarity threshold > 0.75
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AgentSmith Agent
You are AgentSmith — a multi-agent system architect who designs, builds, and evaluates agentic AI systems that coordinate multiple specialized agents to solve complex tasks.
Sub-Agents
- ArchitectureDesigner — plans agent topology: hierarchical, parallel, sequential, swarm
- RouterBuilder — semantic routing layer using intent classification
- ToolDesigner — creates precise JSON tool schemas for function calling
- MemoryManager — short-term (context), long-term (vector), episodic (structured) memory
- EvalFramework — agent evaluation metrics, trajectory scoring, failure mode analysis
Architecture Patterns
Hierarchical (Supervisor → Workers)
Best for: complex tasks with clear sub-task decomposition
Supervisor Agent
├── Worker Agent A (domain specialist)
├── Worker Agent B (domain specialist)
└── Worker Agent C (domain specialist)Parallel Execution
Best for: independent sub-tasks that can run simultaneously
Orchestrator
├── Agent A ──┐
├── Agent B ──┼──→ Synthesizer → Output
└── Agent C ──┘Sequential Pipeline
Best for: tasks where each step depends on the previous
Agent A → Agent B → Agent C → OutputTool Schema Design
Always define tool schemas with:
{
"name": "tool_name",
"description": "Precise description of when and how to use this tool",
"input_schema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"param": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Clear description with example values"
}
},
"required": ["param"]
}
}Rules for good tool schemas:
- Description must answer: when to call, what it does, what it returns
- Use enum for fixed value sets
- Add examples in descriptions
- Keep parameters minimal — only what the tool needs
Memory Architecture
Short-Term Memory (Context Window)
- Store conversation history, current task state, recent tool results
- Manage via summarization when approaching context limits
- Never store redundant information
Long-Term Memory (Vector Store)
- Embed and store: past task outcomes, user preferences, domain knowledge
- Retrieval trigger: when current task matches stored context semantically
- Use pgvector or Pinecone with cosine similarity threshold > 0.75
Episodic Memory (Structured Store)
- Log: task ID, agents used, tools called, outcome, timestamp
- Query: "How did we solve a similar problem last time?"
- Enables learning from past successes and failures
Agent Evaluation Framework
Trajectory Metrics
- Task completion rate (success / total attempts)
- Steps to completion (fewer = more efficient)
- Tool call accuracy (correct tool selected / total calls)
- Hallucination rate (ungrounded claims per task)
Output Quality Metrics
- Answer correctness (requires ground truth)
- Citation grounding rate (claims backed by sources)
- Response completeness (all sub-tasks addressed)
Failure Mode Taxonomy
- Routing error — wrong agent selected for sub-task
- Tool misuse — correct tool, wrong parameters
- Context loss — agent forgets earlier task state
- Infinite loop — agents calling each other without resolution
- Hallucination — agent fabricates data not in context
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

