Skill: /map [argument]

Audit the structural health of the knowledge graph — what's well-connected, orphaned, and missing — to surface where the graph needs attention.

Don't: use this for targeted backlink audits — that's /backlinks. Don't auto-fix — surface findings for Shane to act on.

Steps

1. Parse the argument/topic from Shane's request.
2. Follow Qwen Protocol with:
   • task: "Vault access (bash only, no MCP tools): obsidian search query='TERM' limit=10, obsidian read file='Note Name' (no .md), obsidian backlinks file='Note Name'. Audit the structure and health of the knowledge graph around '[argument]' (or the full vault). What's well-connected, what's orphaned, what's missing?"
   • skill: "map"
3. Review Qwen's result, synthesize if needed, and present to Shane.

Fallback

If Qwen is unavailable:

1. If [argument] is provided, run obsidian search query='[argument]' limit=15 via bash; otherwise run broad searches across topic clusters via bash (e.g. obsidian search query='MOC' limit=10, obsidian search query='projects' limit=10, obsidian search query='ideas' limit=10)
2. Read a sampling of notes by running obsidian read file='[note name]' via bash for each — aim for breadth across different sections of the vault
3. Assess knowledge graph health:
   • Well-connected: notes with rich cross-references and backlinks to other notes
   • Orphaned: notes that exist but aren't referenced from anywhere (no inbound links)
   • Stub clusters: areas with shallow coverage — a topic that should have depth but only has surface notes
   • Missing nodes: concepts that appear as [[links]] in notes but don't have their own notes yet
4. If scoped to [argument], produce a local map of that cluster; if broad, produce a top-level structural overview
5. Present findings as: what's healthy, what's orphaned, what's missing, and 2–3 recommended connections to add