expand
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when asked to expand a stub or sparse note in the Obsidian vault through a targeted interview process. Reads the note, identifies gaps, asks batched questions, then rewrites the note in place with a structured expanded version. Invoke with /expand [note name or path].
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- hiddenjobs/job-search-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AhmedMerza/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AhmedMerza/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- roomi-fields/rtfmtheir own version, first seen Oct 18, 2026
- qbeka/jev-job-searchtheir own version, first seen Oct 4, 2026
- crfldrxyz/AuthorOps-Skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use review.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- tance-mang/chinese-webnovel-skills★ 97same name
- roomi-fields/rtfm★ 27same name
- hiddenjobs/job-search-mcp★ 25same name
- qbeka/jev-job-search★ 5same name
- AhmedMerza/agent-skills★ 2same name
- AhmedMerza/claude-skills★ 2same name
- andrewclark88/skills★ 1same name
- crfldrxyz/AuthorOps-Skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- backlinksSkill
- challengeSkill
- connectSkill
- fix-nested-code-fencesSkill
- ghostSkill
- ingestSkill
- learnedSkill
- mapSkill
- meetingSkill
- obsidianSkill
- source-mineSkill
- traceSkill
- vault-indexSkill
- vault-lintSkill
- vault-retrieveSkill
- weekly-learningsSkill
- weekly-signalsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
Search the vault: obsidian search query='[note name]'
- Very specific: line 16
Read the full contents: obsidian read file='[Note Name]'
- Distinctive: line 17
If not found: stop and tell Shane to create a stub note first
- Distinctive: line 26
Ask 4–6 questions max per round — don't firehose
- Distinctive: line 28
Wait for responses before proceeding
- Distinctive: line 31
After each response, assess remaining gaps
- Very specific: line 36
Use obsidian create name='[Note Name]' content='...' silent to overwrite the note
- Distinctive: line 51
Ask about the *why* before the *how* — motivation and audience unlock most structural decisions
- Distinctive: line 52
When an example exists (like a PA flow or AGENTS.md), use it as an anchor: "Is X like [example], or different in this way?"
- Distinctive: line 53
If an answer reveals a new gap, pursue it in the same round rather than waiting
- Distinctive: line 60
If the note is already well-developed, say so and ask what specifically needs expanding
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill: /expand [note name]
Expand a stub vault note into a structured document through a targeted interview — questions batched by theme, answers drive structure, unresolved items become open questions.
Don't: invoke if the note doesn't exist — create a stub first. Don't invent answers to unresolved questions — carry them forward as open questions in the note.
Steps
- Find and read the note
- Search the vault:
obsidian search query='[note name]' - Read the full contents:
obsidian read file='[Note Name]' - If not found: stop and tell Shane to create a stub note first
- Search the vault:
- Analyze gaps
- Identify what's present: explicit claims, named concepts, examples, open questions
- Identify what's missing: definitions, examples, edge cases, stakeholders, success criteria, failure modes, intended audience, next actions
- Note which gaps are blockers (can't structure the doc without them) vs. enriching (nice to have)
- Ask the first batch of targeted questions
- Group questions by theme (e.g. "On the core concept:", "On the audience:", "On failure modes:")
- Ask 4–6 questions max per round — don't firehose
- Lead with blockers; save enriching questions for later rounds
- Wait for responses before proceeding
- Ask follow-up rounds as needed
- After each response, assess remaining gaps
- Continue until enough is known to write a coherent structured document
- Flag when you have enough: "I think I have enough to expand this — want me to proceed?"
- Rewrite the note in place
- Use
obsidian create name='[Note Name]' content='...' silentto overwrite the note - Note: obsidian CLI
createoverwrites if the note exists. If it doesn't support overwrite, fall back to the Write tool at the full vault path (this is an accepted exception — no obsidian CLI command can overwrite arbitrary content) - Structure the expanded note with:
- A clear title (H1)
- A brief framing statement (what this is, who it's for)
- Sections derived from the interview — let content dictate structure, don't force a template
- An Open Questions section at the bottom for anything unresolved
- Preserve any original language worth keeping; don't sanitize Shane's voice out of it
- Use
- Confirm completion
- Tell Shane the note has been updated
- Highlight any open questions that are load-bearing (i.e. will block the next step if unresolved)
Interview Principles
- Ask about the why before the how — motivation and audience unlock most structural decisions
- When an example exists (like a PA flow or AGENTS.md), use it as an anchor: "Is X like [example], or different in this way?"
- If an answer reveals a new gap, pursue it in the same round rather than waiting
- Carry unresolved items forward as open questions in the note — don't invent answers
Notes
- This skill is note-targeted. The note must exist before invoking — a stub is enough.
- The expanded note replaces the stub in place; no new file is created unless Shane asks
- If the note is already well-developed, say so and ask what specifically needs expanding
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

