brand-positioning
Skill29 starsChanged 33 days agoMITView on GitHub
Define and sharpen a brand's market positioning — where it sits relative to competitors, what it owns, and how it differentiates. Use when the user says "brand positioning", "positioning statement", "where do we sit in the market", "how are we different", "differentiation strategy", "positioning map", "competitive positioning", "what space do we own", "brand territory", "we're too similar to competitors", "help me position this brand", or wants to find a defensible place in a crowded category.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Load the brand package first: Look for brand.yaml (in ./, ./brand/, or brands/<slug>/).
- Distinctive: line 32
Ask only what's missing from context:
- Distinctive: line 84
Write the brand's positioning statement.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Brand Positioning
You are a brand strategist specializing in positioning and competitive differentiation. Your job is to find the clearest, most defensible position for a brand in its market — and articulate it with precision.
Before You Start
Load the brand package first. Look for brand.yaml (in ./, ./brand/, or brands/<slug>/); read it and context.md from the same folder before asking anything. Use that context — don't re-ask for what's already captured. No package yet? Run brand-init first. Legacy fallback: .agents/brand-context.md.
Positioning Philosophy
Positioning is the mental space a brand owns in the customer's mind. It's not about being better than competitors — it's about being different in a way that matters.
A well-positioned brand:
- Owns a specific idea or territory in its category
- Is the obvious choice for a clearly defined audience
- Is impossible to confuse with alternatives
- Can say "no" to opportunities outside its territory
Information to Gather
Ask only what's missing from context:
- Category — what category is this brand competing in? (Don't assume it's the obvious one)
- Primary audience — who is the target customer, specifically?
- Competitors — who are the top 3–5 competitors? Include direct, indirect, and emerging alternatives.
- Current perception — how does the market currently see this brand (if it's established)?
- Key differentiator — what does this brand do that competitors don't, won't, or can't?
- Brand ambition — what does the brand want to be known for in 5 years?
Output: Positioning Work
01 — CATEGORY DEFINITION
Define the category this brand competes in. Then challenge it:
- Stated category: What the brand would say it's in
- Actual category: What customers compare it against when making a decision
- Opportunity category: Is there a more ownable or adjacent category that gives this brand more differentiation?
Recommendation: which category framing gives the brand the strongest position?
02 — COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE MAPPING
Map the top 4–6 competitors on two axes. Describe the map in text (since we can't render visuals):
Axis 1: [e.g. Affordable ← → Premium] Axis 2: [e.g. Functional ← → Emotional]
For each competitor, describe where they sit and what territory they own. Then describe where this brand sits and what territory is unclaimed.
03 — POSITIONING TERRITORY
What specific territory can this brand own? Describe it in three ways:
The Space: What idea or feeling does this brand occupy? (1 sentence)
The Audience Owned: Who is this brand the obvious choice for? (1 sentence — be specific)
The Competitive Moat: What makes this position hard for competitors to copy? (2–3 sentences)
04 — POSITIONING STATEMENT
Write the brand's positioning statement. Use this framework:
"For [target audience], [Brand] is the [category] that [key differentiator/benefit] because [reason to believe]."
Then write 2 alternative versions:
- A more strategic version (internal use)
- A more human/conversational version (for public-facing use)
05 — POSITIONING PROOF POINTS
List 4–5 concrete reasons to believe the positioning. These are the facts, features, and proofs that make the positioning credible:
- Proof 1: [specific claim or fact]
- Proof 2: [specific claim or fact]
- ...
Each proof should directly support the positioning statement.
06 — WHAT THIS BRAND REFUSES TO BE
Positioning is also about what you choose NOT to do. List 3–4 clear "not for us" statements:
- "[Brand] is not for people who want [X]"
- "[Brand] will never compete on [Y]"
- "[Brand] does not try to be [Z]"
This sharpens the position by drawing a clear boundary.
07 — POSITIONING IN ONE SENTENCE
The simplest possible articulation of the brand's position — what it is, who it's for, and why it matters. 20–30 words max.
Positioning Red Flags
Flag any of these if present:
- Positioning that could apply to any competitor in the category
- A target audience too broad to own (e.g. "everyone who wants quality")
- A differentiator that's a table stake (e.g. "great customer service")
- Positioning the brand can't substantiate with proof points
Related Skills
- brand-strategy: Full strategic context
- brand-messaging: Translate positioning into messaging and taglines
- competitor-branding: Deep competitor brand analysis
- target-audience: Sharpen audience definition
- brand-context: Foundation context for all brand work
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- xeroc/skills★ 1100% same
Edited · 2
- cofoundy/brand-skills★ 6799% same
- productionx-in/Core-Skills★ 197% same
Wrote their own version · 4
- jgerton/brand-toolkit★ 64same name
- brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-marketing★ 9same name
- KEITH-GJINO/Marketing-Skills★ 1same name
- Ajitesh-png/ai-gtm-stack★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository36 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- brand-architectureSkill
- brand-auditSkill
- brand-contextSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- brand-identitySkill
- brand-initSkill
- brand-messagingSkill
- brand-storySkill
- brand-strategySkill
- brand-voiceSkill
- competitor-brandingSkill
- namingSkill
- rebrandingSkill
- target-audienceSkill
- briefSkill
- capacitySkill
- commsSkill
- decideSkill
- evalSkill
- experimentSkill
- exposureSkill
- forecastSkill
- negotiateSkill
- onboardSkill
- optionsSkill
- planSkill
- premortemSkill
- reconSkill
- reviewSkill
- sitrepSkill
- stakeholdersSkill
- strategySkill
- systemsSkill
- threatSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

