Audit the choices an implementing agent made, not its diff — a pure decision audit that traces the session's history into a choices ledger, changes no code, and never blocks an unsupervised run. Working code still embeds architecture the user never chose; surface it because future work inherits it. Use when the user wants to review the decisions the AI made on their behalf, before merging or committing AI-implemented work, when integrating a delegated subagent's pass, or when a fix "works" but might be a point fix.
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
3 projects use a version of this
2.9k11d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Audit and prioritize performance work through bounded-work and forward-progress checks. Use when asked to find performance issues, investigate freezes/500s/OOMs, review retries or polling for no-progress loops, rank a performance backlog, or implement the next simple performance fixes.
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
7 projects use a version of this
2.9k11d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Audit whether tests earn their maintenance cost and which suite owns each contract. Use when pruning redundant tests, investigating implementation coupling or test-only production hooks, reviewing the value of proposed coverage, or auditing an entire subsystem. Use write-tests to implement the resulting test changes.
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
10 projects use a version of this
2.9k11d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Run fast, progressive experiments to map tunable parameters and their effects. Use when optimizing code, prompts, configurations, or other artifacts against a goal or benchmark, or when a long research run needs a planned hypothesis queue, focused trials, and durable findings.
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
8 projects use a version of this
2.9k11d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Use Claude Code as an independent `claude -p` subagent when the user explicitly asks for Claude, wants a second-agent opinion from Claude, or asks to delegate a well-scoped task to Claude. Supports selecting `--model` and thinking/effort level with defaults of the current `opus` alias and `high`.
When a spec under specs/<feature>/ is done shipping (a write-spec build, or any planned task that produced a spec), archive it to specs/done/ and rewrite it from a build-plan into a durable rationale — the why, the principles, the invariants — pointing back to the real code for the how. Use when implementation has landed and the plan no longer matches what shipped, or the user says a feature/spec is finished. Pairs with [write-spec](../write-spec/SKILL.md) (the plan this closes) and [review](../review/SKILL.md) (run before closing).
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
3 projects use a version of this
2.9k11d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review changed code for naming, stale references, unnecessary complexity, and comment quality. Use after completing implementation work, before committing, or when the user asks to review or audit code.
Use the local Codex CLI as an independent second agent. Two branches — (1) proactively run `codex review` for a second opinion after completing a substantive change, before presenting it as done or committing; (2) delegate a well-defined implementation task via `codex exec`, ONLY when the user explicitly asks for Codex to do it. Also covers how to prompt Codex.
Compare screenshots against the intended design, distinguishing approved references from historical baselines. Use for iterative implementation matching, before/after visual review, objective image telemetry, or checking a lone capture for flat, empty, or badly framed content.
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
4 projects use a version of this
2.9k11d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Explore UI and visual design with image generation, then iterate the real implementation against the user-selected concept. Use when brainstorming visual directions, offering mockup variants, or implementing an approved generated design; do not stop at the mockups or the first code approximation.
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
3 projects use a version of this
2.9k11d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Eval and improve a skill against golden cases — run the target skill blind in a fresh, context-free subagent on each example input, grade the artifact against the expected outcome, and let the gaps drive the edits. Use when the user wants to test/eval/improve/harden a skill, says "this skill keeps producing X / keeps missing Y", or hands a skill plus example input→expected-output pairs. Pairs with [write-skills](../write-skills/SKILL.md) (the authoring principles every fix obeys).
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the codebase or domain is unfamiliar, the user will "know it when they see it", a reference implementation must be understood before porting, mid-build deviations from the plan need capturing, or a finished change needs buy-in or verified understanding before merge. Pairs with [write-spec](../write-spec/SKILL.md) — walk the quadrants to burn off fog before slicing, and feed the finished map into the spec.
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
4 projects use a version of this
2.9k11d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Implement an existing spec through committed passes. Use for long or multi-pass specs that need maintenance checkpoints to periodically clean code, handoffs, priorities, and plan bloat before drift accumulates.
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
81 projects use a version of this
2.9k11d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Run [implement-spec](../implement-spec/SKILL.md) with Codex doing the implementation passes while you orchestrate, integrate, and review. Use when the user asks to implement a spec with Codex, or to run implement-spec with Codex as the implementer.
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
3 projects use a version of this
2.9k11d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Use for questions about how, why, or where behavior works in a repository, including questions that name a function or setting. Start behavioral discovery with jg before broad text searches or git history. When delegating repository discovery, instruct the subagent to start with jg. Jevgrep returns relevant files and source excerpts. For exact symbol definitions, string matches, or filenames, use grep or file search instead.
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
No other project uses it yet
2.9k11d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Make a showreel-grade motion-graphics launch video, with music, that introduces a CLI, library, or product from its repo. Use when asked for a launch, promo, sizzle, or showreel video, an animated intro for a project, or a video to post on X/social.
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
19 projects use a version of this
2.9k11d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Best-practice rulebook for a marketing site's pages, organized by page class — campaign landers, product pages, programmatic SEO trees, editorial. Use when writing or updating a landing/marketing page, wiring a campaign lander to an attribution identifier, changing site-wide nav/footer links, touching sitemap/robots/agent-readable surfaces, or auditing a public site's indexing, reachability, and conversion setup.
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
2 projects use a version of this
2.9k11d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
A folder with a SKILL.md file: a name, a description of when to use it, and instructions. Claude loads a skill only when the task matches its description.
How do I use one I find here?
Copy the folder into your project's .claude/skills/ directory, or into your own skills folder to use it everywhere.
What do the warnings mean?
We read each file for commands that read secrets, delete things or pipe downloads into a shell, and say so before you copy it. No warning is not a promise that a file is safe.
Which skills worked for people?
Open a skill to see its discussion. Reports from people and their agents are coming.