agentleFS
isLinXuisLinXu/eval-skills/SKILL.md

eval-skills

Skill4 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

AI Agent Skill unit testing framework. A framework-agnostic toolkit for discovering, scaffolding, selecting, evaluating, and reporting on AI skills. Use this skill to assess skill quality before production, compare candidate skills on the same benchmark, enforce quality gates in CI/CD, and generate human-readable evaluation reports.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Search for existing skills by keyword, tag, or adapter type.

    line 30
  2. Distinctive:

    Run benchmark evaluations against one or more skills.

    line 85
  3. Very specific:

    Write reports to --output-dir

    line 129
  4. Very specific:

    Every evaluation produces a SkillCompletionReport with these metrics:

    line 262
  5. Very specific:

    Create a benchmark.json file:

    line 285
  6. Very specific:

    Always use --runs 3 or more: when evaluating for production decisions.

    line 415
  7. Very specific:

    Every skill must provide a skill.json that conforms to this structure:

    line 433

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

eval-skills

AI Agent Skill unit testing framework — a framework-agnostic toolkit for discovering, scaffolding, selecting, evaluating, and reporting on AI skills.

This skill fills the L1 (Skill Unit Test) gap that LangSmith / DeepEval leave open: while those platforms focus on agent-level and trajectory-level evaluation (L2-L3), eval-skills targets the individual skill level, ensuring each building block meets quality standards before it ever enters an agent pipeline.

When to Use This Skill

  • Before deploying a new skill to production — run eval to verify it meets your quality gate.
  • When choosing between multiple candidate skills — run select to rank them on the same benchmark.
  • When a skill is upgraded — run report diff to detect regressions.
  • In CI/CD — use --exit-on-fail to block merges that degrade skill quality.
  • When bootstrapping a new skill — run create to generate a ready-to-fill skeleton.

Capabilities

1. Find Skills

Search for existing skills by keyword, tag, or adapter type.

eval-skills find \
  --query "web search" \
  --tag retrieval api \
  --adapter http \
  --min-completion 0.8 \
  --skills-dir ./skills \
  --limit 10
OptionDescriptionDefault
-q, --query <string>Keyword search (matches name, description, tags)—
-t, --tag <tags...>Filter by tags (intersection: skill must have ALL specified tags)—
-a, --adapter <type>Filter by adapter type (http, subprocess, mcp)—
--min-completion <rate>Minimum historical completion rate (0.0 ~ 1.0)—
--skills-dir <dir>Directory to scan for skill.json files./skills
--limit <n>Maximum number of results20

Results are ranked by search relevance (when --query is provided) or by historical completion rate (descending).

2. Create Skills

Generate a skill skeleton from a template to bootstrap development.

eval-skills create \
  --name my_api_skill \
  --from-template http_request \
  --output-dir ./skills \
  --description "Fetches weather data from OpenWeather API"
OptionDescriptionDefault
--name <name>Required. Skill name—
--from-template <tpl>Template type: http_request, python_script, mcp_toolhttp_request
--output-dir <dir>Output directory./skills
--description <text>Human-readable description embedded in skill.json—

Generated file structure:

skills/my_api_skill/
  skill.json            # Skill metadata (id, schemas, adapter config)
  adapter.config.json   # Adapter-specific configuration
  tests/
    basic.eval.json     # A starter benchmark with one sample task
  skill.py              # (python_script template only) JSON-RPC entrypoint

3. Evaluate Skills

Run benchmark evaluations against one or more skills. This is the core command.

eval-skills eval \
  --skills ./skills/calculator/skill.json ./skills/search/ \
  --benchmark coding-easy \
  --concurrency 4 \
  --timeout 30000 \
  --retries 2 \
  --runs 3 \
  --evaluator exact \
  --format json markdown html \
  --output-dir ./reports \
  --exit-on-fail --min-completion 0.8 \
  --store ./eval-skills.db
OptionDescriptionDefault
--skills <paths...>Required. Skill file(s) or directory(ies)—
--benchmark <id|path>Built-in benchmark ID or path to benchmark.jsoncoding-easy
--tasks <file>Custom tasks JSON file (replaces benchmark)—
--concurrency <n>Number of parallel task executions4
--timeout <ms>Per-task timeout in milliseconds30000
--retries <n>Retry count on task failure (with incremental backoff)0
--runs <n>Repeat evaluation N times for consistency scoring1
--evaluator <type>Default scorer type (see Scorer Types below)exact
--format <formats...>Output formats: json, markdown, htmljson markdown
--output-dir <dir>Report output directory./reports
--exit-on-failExit with code 1 if any skill falls below thresholddisabled
--min-completion <rate>Threshold for --exit-on-fail0.7
--dry-runValidate configuration only; do not execute tasksdisabled
--benchmarks-dir <dir>Directory containing built-in benchmarks./benchmarks
--store <path>SQLite database path for persistent result storage./eval-skills.db
-c, --config <path>Path to eval-skills.config.yamlauto-detected

Evaluation flow:

  1. Load skills from --skills paths (supports both single skill.json and directories)
  2. Load benchmark tasks from --benchmark or --tasks
  3. Build the cartesian product: skills x tasks x runs
  4. Execute all task items concurrently (controlled by --concurrency, with timeout and retry)
  5. Score each result using the appropriate scorer
  6. Aggregate into SkillCompletionReport per skill
  7. Write reports to --output-dir

4. Select Skills

Filter and rank skills based on evaluation reports using a multi-dimensional strategy.

eval-skills select \
  --from ./skills \
  --reports ./reports/eval-result.json \
  --strategy ./strategy.yaml \
  --min-completion 0.8 \
  --top-k 5 \
  --output ./selected.json
OptionDescriptionDefault
--from <path>Required. Candidate skills directory or JSON file—
--reports <file>Evaluation reports JSON file—
--strategy <file>SelectStrategy YAML/JSON filebuilt-in default
--min-completion <rate>Override minimum completion rate filter—
--top-k <n>Return only the top K resultsall
--output <file>Write selected skills to filestdout

Selection pipeline: Filter (by completion rate, error rate, latency, adapter type, required tags) -> Score -> Rank (by compositeScore, completionRate, latency, or tokenCost) -> TopK

Example strategy.yaml:

filters:
  minCompletionRate: 0.8
  maxErrorRate: 0.1
  maxLatencyP95Ms: 5000
  adapterTypes: [http, subprocess]
  requiredTags: [production-ready]
sortBy: compositeScore
order: desc
topK: 5

5. Run Pipeline

Execute the full end-to-end pipeline: Find -> Eval -> Select -> Report in a single command.

eval-skills run \
  --query "math" \
  --benchmark coding-easy \
  --skills-dir ./skills \
  --top-k 3 \
  --min-completion 0.7 \
  --format json markdown \
  --output-dir ./reports

This command automates the entire process:

  1. Find — scans --skills-dir and optionally filters by --query
  2. Eval — evaluates all candidate skills against --benchmark
  3. Select — filters and ranks results using --min-completion, --top-k, and optional --strategy
  4. Report — generates output files in all requested --formats

6. Generate & Compare Reports

Convert report format

eval-skills report convert \
  --input ./reports/eval-result.json \
  --format html \
  --output ./reports/eval-result.html

Supported output formats: markdown, html.

Diff two reports (regression detection)

eval-skills report diff \
  ./reports/v1.json ./reports/v2.json \
  --label-a "v1.0" --label-b "v2.0" \
  --output ./reports/diff.md

Generates a side-by-side delta table per skill showing changes in completion rate, error rate, P95 latency, and composite score with directional arrows.

7. Initialize Project

eval-skills init --dir .

Creates the project scaffold:

  • eval-skills.config.yaml — global configuration
  • skills/ — directory for skill definitions
  • benchmarks/ — directory for benchmark files
  • reports/ — directory for evaluation output

8. Manage Configuration

# List all current configuration values
eval-skills config list

# Get a specific value (supports dot notation)
eval-skills config get llm.model

# Set a value (persisted to ~/.eval-skills/config.yaml)
eval-skills config set concurrency 8
eval-skills config set llm.model gpt-4o
eval-skills config set llm.temperature 0

Configuration is resolved in priority order:

  1. CLI flags (highest priority)
  2. eval-skills.config.yaml in current directory
  3. ~/.eval-skills/config.yaml
  4. Built-in defaults (concurrency: 4, timeoutMs: 30000, outputDir: ./reports)

Scorer Types

Each task in a benchmark specifies an evaluator type. The scorer compares the skill's actual output against the expected output.

TypeAliasesDescriptionScore Range
exact_matchexactStrict equality comparison. Supports caseSensitive option.0 or 1
contains—Checks for the presence of all specified keywords in the output. Partial credit: matched_keywords / total_keywords.0.0 ~ 1.0
json_schemaschemaValidates output against a JSON Schema (using Ajv).0 or 1
llm_judge—Sends the output + expected rubric to an LLM (configurable model) for quality rating.0.0 ~ 1.0
custom—Loads a custom scorer from expectedOutput.customScorerPath.0.0 ~ 1.0

Evaluation Metrics

Every evaluation produces a SkillCompletionReport with these metrics:

MetricDescriptionFormula
Completion RateFraction of tasks that passedpass_count / total_count
Partial ScoreMean score across all tasksmean(task_scores)
Error RateFraction of tasks that errored or timed out(error_count + timeout_count) / total_count
Consistency ScoreStability across multiple runs (requires --runs >= 2)1 - stddev(per_run_completion_rates)
P50 / P95 / P99 LatencyResponse time percentilesSorted percentile of latencyMs
Composite ScoreWeighted overall quality score0.5 * CR + 0.2 * (1 - latP95_norm) + 0.3 * (1 - ER)

Built-in Benchmarks

IDDomainTasksScoringDescription
coding-easycoding20mean / exact_matchMath expressions, string reversal, palindrome detection
skill-qualitytool-use5mean / containsMetadata completeness, description quality, structure checks
web-search-basicweb8mean / contains + schemaFactual queries, keyword verification, structured output validation
gaia-v1general—meanPlaceholder for GAIA benchmark Level 1 tasks
toolbench-litetool-use—meanPlaceholder for ToolBench single-tool scenarios

Custom Benchmark

Create a benchmark.json file:

{
  "id": "my-benchmark",
  "name": "My Custom Benchmark",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "domain": "general",
  "scoringMethod": "mean",
  "maxLatencyMs": 30000,
  "metadata": { "source": "internal", "lastUpdated": "2026-02-28" },
  "tasks": [
    {
      "id": "task_001",
      "description": "Test basic addition",
      "inputData": { "expression": "2+3" },
      "expectedOutput": { "type": "exact", "value": "5" },
      "evaluator": { "type": "exact" },
      "timeoutMs": 10000,
      "tags": ["math"]
    },
    {
      "id": "task_002",
      "description": "Test keyword presence",
      "inputData": { "query": "TypeScript" },
      "expectedOutput": { "type": "contains", "keywords": ["JavaScript", "Microsoft"] },
      "evaluator": { "type": "contains", "caseSensitive": false },
      "timeoutMs": 15000,
      "tags": ["search"]
    }
  ]
}
eval-skills eval --skills ./my-skill/ --benchmark ./my-benchmark.json

Adapter Types

Skills communicate through adapters. The adapter type is specified in skill.json via adapterType.

AdapterProtocolHow it worksKey config
httpREST POSTSends POST { skillId, version, input } to skill.entrypoint. Supports Bearer / API-Key auth via env vars.baseUrl, authType, authTokenEnvKey
subprocessJSON-RPC 2.0 over stdin/stdoutSpawns skill.entrypoint (e.g. python3 skill.py), writes JSON-RPC request to stdin, reads response from stdout.command, args
mcpMCP Protocol(Phase 2) Native Model Context Protocol integration via @modelcontextprotocol/sdk.—

Workflow Examples

Evaluating a Single Skill

# 1. Create a skill skeleton
eval-skills create --name my_calc --from-template python_script

# 2. Implement your logic in skills/my_calc/skill.py

# 3. Run evaluation against the coding-easy benchmark
eval-skills eval \
  --skills ./skills/my_calc/skill.json \
  --benchmark coding-easy \
  --runs 3 \
  --format json markdown

# 4. Review the report
cat ./reports/eval-result-*.md

Comparing Multiple Candidate Skills

# 1. Discover candidates
eval-skills find --query "weather" --skills-dir ./skills

# 2. Evaluate all candidates on the same benchmark
eval-skills eval \
  --skills ./skills/weather_v1 ./skills/weather_v2 ./skills/weather_v3 \
  --benchmark web-search-basic \
  --runs 3

# 3. Select the best
eval-skills select \
  --from ./skills \
  --reports ./reports/eval-result-*.json \
  --min-completion 0.8 \
  --top-k 2

# 4. Compare two versions
eval-skills report diff \
  ./reports/v1.json ./reports/v2.json \
  --label-a "weather_v1" --label-b "weather_v2"

Full Pipeline (One Command)

eval-skills run \
  --skills-dir ./skills \
  --benchmark coding-easy \
  --top-k 3 \
  --min-completion 0.7 \
  --format json markdown html \
  --output-dir ./reports

CI/CD Quality Gate

# In your CI pipeline — fail the build if completion rate drops below 80%
eval-skills eval \
  --skills ./skills/production_skill \
  --benchmark coding-easy \
  --exit-on-fail \
  --min-completion 0.8 \
  --format json

Regression Detection

# Compare today's evaluation against the baseline
eval-skills report diff \
  ./reports/baseline.json ./reports/latest.json \
  --label-a "baseline" --label-b "latest" \
  --output ./reports/regression-check.md

Best Practices

  1. Always use --runs 3 or more when evaluating for production decisions. Single-run results can be noisy; the consistency score captures stability across runs.
  2. Use --exit-on-fail in CI/CD pipelines to enforce quality gates. Set --min-completion to your acceptable threshold (recommended: 0.8 for production skills).
  3. Create domain-specific custom benchmarks rather than relying solely on built-in ones. Your custom benchmark should reflect real-world inputs your skill will encounter.
  4. Use report diff after every skill upgrade to catch regressions early. Compare the new evaluation against a saved baseline report.
  5. Use --dry-run before long evaluations to validate your configuration (skill paths, benchmark resolution, task count) without actually executing tasks.
  6. Persist results with --store to track skill quality over time. The SQLite store enables historical trend queries.
  7. Start with --concurrency 1 when debugging a failing skill, then increase for production benchmarking.
  8. Tag your benchmark tasks to enable per-category analysis (e.g., filter by math, string, edge-case).

Skill JSON Schema

Every skill must provide a skill.json that conforms to this structure:

{
  "id": "my_skill_v1",
  "name": "My Skill",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "description": "Does something useful",
  "tags": ["utility", "math"],
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": { "query": { "type": "string" } },
    "required": ["query"]
  },
  "outputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": { "result": { "type": "string" } }
  },
  "adapterType": "subprocess",
  "entrypoint": "python3 skill.py",
  "metadata": {
    "author": "Your Name",
    "license": "MIT",
    "homepage": "https://github.com/you/my-skill"
  }
}

Validation rules:

  • id: lowercase alphanumeric with _ or -, non-empty
  • version: semver format (X.Y.Z)
  • adapterType: one of http, subprocess, mcp, langchain, custom
  • entrypoint: non-empty string (URL for http, command for subprocess)

Global Options

These options are available on all commands:

OptionDescription
-c, --config <path>Path to configuration file
--jsonJSON output format (CI-friendly)
--no-colorDisable colored output
-v, --verboseVerbose logging
--versionShow version
-h, --helpShow help

Download now (ZIP)

  • Other versions6 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 6

    1. dzhng/jevgrep★ 2.9ksame name
    2. dzhng/skills★ 1.4ksame name
    3. dzhng/yap★ 112same name
    4. dzhng/duet-agent★ 49same name
    5. iliaal/whetstone★ 35same name
    6. transitive-bullshit/skills★ 3same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • Used alongsideProjects with it also use compare-screenshots, audit-choices and 10 more.

    Other files people use alongside this one.

    Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
    • transitive-bullshitSkill

      compare-screenshots

      Compare screenshots against the intended design, distinguishing approved references from historical baselines. Use for iterative implementation matching, before/after visual review, objective image telemetry, or checking a lone capture for flat, empty, or badly framed content.

      Also in 5 projects that use this

    • dzhngSkill

      audit-choices

      Audit the choices an implementing agent made, not its diff — a pure decision audit that traces the session's history into a choices ledger, changes no code, and never blocks an unsupervised run. Working code still embeds architecture the user never chose; surface it because future work inherits it. Use when the user wants to review the decisions the AI made on their behalf, before merging or committing AI-implemented work, when integrating a delegated subagent's pass, or when a fix "works" but might be a point fix.

      Also in 4 projects that use this

    • dzhngSkill

      close-spec

      When a spec under specs/<feature>/ is done shipping (a write-spec build, or any planned task that produced a spec), archive it to specs/done/ and rewrite it from a build-plan into a durable rationale — the why, the principles, the invariants — pointing back to the real code for the how. Use when implementation has landed and the plan no longer matches what shipped, or the user says a feature/spec is finished. Pairs with [write-spec](../write-spec/SKILL.md) (the plan this closes) and [review](../review/SKILL.md) (run before closing).

      Also in 4 projects that use this

    • LucasMatuszewskiSkill

      audit-agents

      Audit and maintain agent configuration files (.claude/agents, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, agent-memory). Checks for duplicates, outdated info, naming conflicts, wrong technical facts, and files over 200 lines. Fixes all issues and commits.

      Also in 4 projects that use this

    • gastonsalgSkill

      write-skills

      Creates effective Claude Code skills following official Anthropic guidelines and community best practices. Use when creating or refactoring skills. Focuses on WHAT not HOW, proper structure, and addressing real failure modes.

      Also in 5 projects that use this

    • rhnfzlSkill

      explore-unknowns

      Walk the user through mapping the unknowns of a task before, during, and after they build it, and hand them a four-quadrant map (settled ground, open decisions, taste, and landmines) they keep. Reach for this eagerly whenever a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the codebase or domain is unfamiliar, the user will "know it when they see it", a reference implementation must be understood before porting, a build-queue or architecture-changing task is about to start, a mid-build deviation needs capturing, or a finished change needs buy-in or verified understanding before merge. Trigger even when the skill is not named: "do a blindspot pass", "find my unknown unknowns", "interview me about this change", "brainstorm the approach for a task I am about to build", "help me scope this", "what am I missing here", "plan this before I build", "I know nothing about X in this codebase". When a territory profile is present it reads memory and the graph first and feeds the map into the build pipeline; without one it degrades to a plain general map. Not for trivial or mechanical tasks with clear acceptance criteria, single-fact lookups, pure debugging of a known symptom, or pure code review, those have their own tools. Do not use it to run the build itself; the map is the deliverable and implementation remains a separate task, whether it has not started or is already underway.

      Also in 4 projects that use this

    • +5 more from dzhng

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.