claudeCode
AGENTS.md0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
This is a production-ready AI coding plugin providing 68 specialized agents, 288 skills, 94 commands, and automated hook workflows for software development. Version: 2.2.1 Use agents proactively without user prompt: - Complex feature requests → planner - Code just written/modified → code-reviewer - Bug fix or new feature → tdd-guide - Architectural decision → architect - Security-sensitive code → security-reviewer - Brownfield project onboarding → spec-miner - Autonomous loops / loop monitoring → loop-operator - Harness config reliability and cost…
Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.
Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,843 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository93 other files it gives its agents.
- .codex/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- examples/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/common-agents.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-development-workflow.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-git-workflow.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-performance.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-testing.mdCursor rule
- agent-introspection-debuggingSkill
- agent-sortSkill
- api-designSkill
- article-writingSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- benchmark-methodologySkill
- brand-discoverySkill
- brand-voiceSkill
- bun-runtimeSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- competitive-platform-analysisSkill
- competitive-report-structureSkill
- content-engineSkill
- crosspostSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- dmux-workflowsSkill
- documentation-lookupSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. About 3 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈3
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈14
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 54
Use agents proactively without user prompt:
- Distinctive: line 65
Use parallel execution for independent operations — launch multiple agents simultaneously.
- Common: line 70
No hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)
- Distinctive: line 71
All user inputs validated
- Common: line 79
Secret management: NEVER hardcode secrets. Use environment variables or a secret manager.
- Common: line 81
If security issue found: STOP → use security-reviewer agent → fix CRITICAL issues → rotate exposed secrets → review codebase for similar …
- Distinctive: line 85
Immutability (CRITICAL): Always create new objects, never mutate.
- Distinctive: line 95
No deep nesting (>4 levels)
- Distinctive: line 103
Test types (all required):
- Distinctive: line 109
Write test first (RED) — test should FAIL
- Distinctive: line 110
Write minimal implementation (GREEN) — test should PASS
- Distinctive: line 123
If the current task already produces the relevant docs or code comments, do not duplicate the same information elsewhere
- Distinctive: line 124
If there is no obvious project doc location, ask before creating a new top-level file
- Distinctive: line 145
Skeleton projects: Search for battle-tested templates, evaluate with parallel agents (security, extensibility, relevance), clone best …
- Distinctive: line 149
Context management: Avoid last 20% of context window for large refactoring and multi-file features.
- Distinctive: line 151
Build troubleshooting: Use build-error-resolver agent → analyze errors → fix incrementally → verify after each fix.
- Distinctive: line 170
All tests pass with 80%+ coverage
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Everything Claude Code (ECC) — Agent Instructions
This is a production-ready AI coding plugin providing 68 specialized agents, 288 skills, 94 commands, and automated hook workflows for software development.
Version: 2.2.1
Core Principles
- Agent-First — Delegate to specialized agents for domain tasks
- Test-Driven — Write tests before implementation, 80%+ coverage required
- Security-First — Never compromise on security; validate all inputs
- Immutability — Always create new objects, never mutate existing ones
- Plan Before Execute — Plan complex features before writing code
Available Agents
| Agent | Purpose | When to Use |
| planner | Implementation planning | Complex features, refactoring |
| architect | System design and scalability | Architectural decisions |
| tdd-guide | Test-driven development | New features, bug fixes |
| code-reviewer | Code quality and maintainability | After writing/modifying code |
| security-reviewer | Vulnerability detection | Before commits, sensitive code |
| spec-miner | Brownfield spec extraction | Onboarding brownfield projects to spec-driven development |
| build-error-resolver | Fix build/type errors | When build fails |
| e2e-runner | End-to-end Playwright testing | Critical user flows |
| refactor-cleaner | Dead code cleanup | Code maintenance |
| doc-updater | Documentation and codemaps | Updating docs |
| cpp-reviewer | C/C++ code review | C and C++ projects |
| cpp-build-resolver | C/C++ build errors | C and C++ build failures |
| fsharp-reviewer | F# functional code review | F# projects |
| docs-lookup | Documentation lookup via Context7 | API/docs questions |
| go-reviewer | Go code review | Go projects |
| go-build-resolver | Go build errors | Go build failures |
| kotlin-reviewer | Kotlin code review | Kotlin/Android/KMP projects |
| kotlin-build-resolver | Kotlin/Gradle build errors | Kotlin build failures |
| database-reviewer | PostgreSQL/Supabase specialist | Schema design, query optimization |
| python-reviewer | Python code review | Python projects |
| django-reviewer | Django code review | Django apps, DRF APIs, ORM, migrations |
| django-build-resolver | Django build, migration, and setup errors | Django startup, dependency, migration, collectstatic failures |
| java-reviewer | Java and Spring Boot code review | Java/Spring Boot projects |
| java-build-resolver | Java/Maven/Gradle build errors | Java build failures |
| loop-operator | Autonomous loop execution | Run loops safely, monitor stalls, intervene |
| harness-optimizer | Harness config tuning | Reliability, cost, throughput |
| rust-reviewer | Rust code review | Rust projects |
| rust-build-resolver | Rust build errors | Rust build failures |
| pytorch-build-resolver | PyTorch runtime/CUDA/training errors | PyTorch build/training failures |
| mle-reviewer | Production ML pipeline review | ML pipelines, evals, serving, monitoring, rollback |
| rag-pipeline-reviewer | RAG pipeline review | Retrieval quality, chunking, reranking, RAGAS evaluation coverage |
| typescript-reviewer | TypeScript/JavaScript code review | TypeScript/JavaScript projects |
Agent Orchestration
Use agents proactively without user prompt:
- Complex feature requests → planner
- Code just written/modified → code-reviewer
- Bug fix or new feature → tdd-guide
- Architectural decision → architect
- Security-sensitive code → security-reviewer
- Brownfield project onboarding → spec-miner
- Autonomous loops / loop monitoring → loop-operator
- Harness config reliability and cost → harness-optimizer
- RAG/retrieval pipeline changes → rag-pipeline-reviewer
Use parallel execution for independent operations — launch multiple agents simultaneously.
Security Guidelines
Before ANY commit:
- No hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)
- All user inputs validated
- SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
- XSS prevention (sanitized HTML)
- CSRF protection enabled
- Authentication/authorization verified
- Rate limiting on all endpoints
- Error messages don't leak sensitive data
Secret management: NEVER hardcode secrets. Use environment variables or a secret manager. Validate required secrets at startup. Rotate any exposed secrets immediately.
If security issue found: STOP → use security-reviewer agent → fix CRITICAL issues → rotate exposed secrets → review codebase for similar issues.
Coding Style
Immutability (CRITICAL): Always create new objects, never mutate. Return new copies with changes applied.
File organization: Many small files over few large ones. 200-400 lines typical, 800 max. Organize by feature/domain, not by type. High cohesion, low coupling.
Error handling: Handle errors at every level. Provide user-friendly messages in UI code. Log detailed context server-side. Never silently swallow errors.
Input validation: Validate all user input at system boundaries. Use schema-based validation. Fail fast with clear messages. Never trust external data.
Code quality checklist:
- Functions small (<50 lines), files focused (<800 lines)
- No deep nesting (>4 levels)
- Proper error handling, no hardcoded values
- Readable, well-named identifiers
Testing Requirements
Minimum coverage: 80%
Test types (all required):
- Unit tests — Individual functions, utilities, components
- Integration tests — API endpoints, database operations
- E2E tests — Critical user flows
TDD workflow (mandatory):
- Write test first (RED) — test should FAIL
- Write minimal implementation (GREEN) — test should PASS
- Refactor (IMPROVE) — verify coverage 80%+
Troubleshoot failures: check test isolation → verify mocks → fix implementation (not tests, unless tests are wrong).
Development Workflow
- Plan — Use planner agent, identify dependencies and risks, break into phases
- TDD — Use tdd-guide agent, write tests first, implement, refactor
- Review — Use code-reviewer agent immediately, address CRITICAL/HIGH issues
- Capture knowledge in the right place
- Personal debugging notes, preferences, and temporary context → auto memory
- Team/project knowledge (architecture decisions, API changes, runbooks) → the project's existing docs structure
- If the current task already produces the relevant docs or code comments, do not duplicate the same information elsewhere
- If there is no obvious project doc location, ask before creating a new top-level file
- Commit — Conventional commits format, comprehensive PR summaries
Workflow Surface Policy
skills/is the canonical workflow surface.- New workflow contributions should land in
skills/first. commands/is a legacy slash-entry compatibility surface and should only be added or updated when a shim is still required for migration or cross-harness parity.
Git Workflow
Commit format: <type>: <description> — Types: feat, fix, refactor, docs, test, chore, perf, ci
PR workflow: Analyze full commit history → draft comprehensive summary → include test plan → push with -u flag.
Architecture Patterns
API response format: Consistent envelope with success indicator, data payload, error message, and pagination metadata.
Repository pattern: Encapsulate data access behind standard interface (findAll, findById, create, update, delete). Business logic depends on abstract interface, not storage mechanism.
Skeleton projects: Search for battle-tested templates, evaluate with parallel agents (security, extensibility, relevance), clone best match, iterate within proven structure.
Performance
Context management: Avoid last 20% of context window for large refactoring and multi-file features. Lower-sensitivity tasks (single edits, docs, simple fixes) tolerate higher utilization.
Build troubleshooting: Use build-error-resolver agent → analyze errors → fix incrementally → verify after each fix.
Project Structure
agents/ — 68 specialized subagents
skills/ — 288 workflow skills and domain knowledge
commands/ — 94 slash commands
hooks/ — Trigger-based automations
rules/ — Always-follow guidelines (common + per-language)
scripts/ — Cross-platform Node.js utilities
mcp-configs/ — 14 MCP server configurations
tests/ — Test suitecommands/ remains in the repo for compatibility, but the long-term direction is skills-first.
Success Metrics
- All tests pass with 80%+ coverage
- No security vulnerabilities
- Code is readable and maintainable
- Performance is acceptable
- User requirements are met
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

