agentleFS
siva323388siva323388/claudeCode/.cursor/rules/common-git-workflow.md

claudeCode / rules

Cursor rule0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Git workflow: conventional commits, PR process

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 0 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this common-git-workflow.md into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use git diff [base-branch]...HEAD to see all changes

    line 22

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 6,668 Cursor rule files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
common-git-workflow.md

Git Workflow

Commit Message Format

<type>: <description>

<optional body>

Types: feat, fix, refactor, docs, test, chore, perf, ci

Note: ECC-managed installs set "includeCoAuthoredBy": false in ~/.claude/settings.json, so commits carry no Co-Authored-By trailer by default. To keep Claude attribution, set "includeCoAuthoredBy": true or configure attribution; ECC never overwrites an explicit choice.

Pull Request Workflow

When creating PRs:

  1. Analyze full commit history (not just latest commit)
  2. Use git diff [base-branch]...HEAD to see all changes
  3. Draft comprehensive PR summary
  4. Include test plan with TODOs
  5. Push with -u flag if new branch

For the full development process (planning, TDD, code review) before git operations, see the development workflow rule.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.