agentleFS
sherificansherifican/Agent-FleetOps/skills/multi-agent-code-workflow/SKILL.md

multi-agent-code-workflow

Skill34 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub

Coordinate a guarded, independently reviewed, and functionally verified code change.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this workflow for a code change that will be shipped.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Read the repository instructions and identify protected areas, required approvals, backup rules, and any single-writer/driver-lock rule.

    line 12
  3. Distinctive:

    Run the task's actual test, build, or reproduction against the reviewed result.

    line 15
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep one active writer for a source area unless the repository expressly supports concurrent edits.

    line 19
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not infer a pass from a plausible diff.

    line 21
  6. Distinctive:

    Use a narrow change; do not add unrelated refactors while resolving a scoped request.

    line 22

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Multi-Agent Code Workflow

Overview

Use this workflow for a code change that will be shipped. It coordinates scope control, implementation, independent review, a real functional check, and evidence-backed reporting. It is deliberately a workflow, not a substitute for project-specific guardrails.

Procedure

  1. Read the repository instructions and identify protected areas, required approvals, backup rules, and any single-writer/driver-lock rule.
  2. Scope the change and record the intended verification command before editing. If a protected area needs work, obtain the required approval and make the required backup first.
  3. Generate and review the change with separate roles; use the generate-review-fix loop for that portion.
  4. Run the task's actual test, build, or reproduction against the reviewed result. A review is not a functional check.
  5. Audit every shipping claim against the live files and tool output. Report unrun checks, warnings, and limitations explicitly.

Rules

  • Keep one active writer for a source area unless the repository expressly supports concurrent edits.
  • The generator must not be the only reviewer of its own change.
  • Do not infer a pass from a plausible diff. Preserve the command output as evidence.
  • Use a narrow change; do not add unrelated refactors while resolving a scoped request.

Pitfalls

  • Skipping the functional test because a reviewer approved the patch.
  • Editing a protected function without its approval and backup procedure.
  • Reporting a test result that was not run against the final revision.

Verification checklist

  • Project safeguards and source ownership were checked.
  • The final revision received independent review.
  • A relevant functional check was run and its output retained.
  • The report distinguishes verified facts from unresolved gaps.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.