deck
Skill0 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Hackathon, after /ccs:pitch. Builds the whole pitch deck (7–9 slides, demo video at the centre) as offline HTML in the house design, then screenshots and checks every slide and exports PDF. User-invoked only.
- Installs packages
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- serhiileniv/skillsword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- roaldnefs/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 29, 2026
- JustOneMoreTry/NoMoreHigstheir own version, first seen Aug 4, 2026
- iuiaoin/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 8, 2026
- foogunlana/skillstheir own version, first seen May 23, 2026
- zauberzeug/game-of-cardstheir own version, first seen May 18, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- serhiileniv/skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- iuiaoin/agent-skills★ 16same name
- zauberzeug/game-of-cards★ 7same name
- drobotmax/claude-skill-deck★ 1same name
- foogunlana/skills★ 1same name
- roaldnefs/skills★ 1same name
- JustOneMoreTry/NoMoreHigs★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
Read hackathon/plan.md, facts.md, script.md (from /ccs:brief and /ccs:pitch), demo/out/ (video + poster), and screenshots the repo has.
- Very specific: line 59
every number on a slide is in facts.md
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/ccs:deck
The deck supports the talk and frames the demo. It never repeats the script and never shows a number the repo can't prove.
Step 0 — inputs
Read hackathon/plan.md, facts.md, script.md (from /ccs:brief and /ccs:pitch),
demo/out/ (video + poster), and screenshots the repo has.
No facts.md → stop and run /ccs:pitch first. Design: the house design.
Step 1 — outline
One idea per slide, mapped to a section of script.md:
| # | Slide | Content |
| 1 | Title | Product name + the promise (the sentence, shortened). No agenda. |
| 2 | Problem | One user's moment, one visual, at most 2 costs. |
| 3 | Idea | The one idea, ≤ 12 words, or the contrast line. |
| 4 | Product | One cropped real screenshot in a device frame, ≤ 3 callouts. Crop, never shrink. |
| 5 | Demo | demo.mp4 full-bleed, local file, poster frame; live fallback note in speaker notes. |
| 6–7 | Proof | One wow per slide: a big number from facts.md + one caption that says what it means. |
| 8 | How it's built | Diagram of the trust path ("LLM proposes, code verifies"), not the stack list. |
| 9 | Close | The sentence + QR to the live link or repo. |
7 slides is fine; 9 is the ceiling. Drop slides before shrinking text. Demo-data numbers are labelled as demo data. Show the outline, then build — no approval wait unless the user asked for one.
Step 2 — build
Copy ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/template/ to hackathon/deck/ (keep vendor/ and fonts/; it must present offline).
Edit only the slide sections in index.html; reuse the layouts the template already has.
- Speaker notes per slide (
<aside class="notes">) = that slide's lines fromscript.md. - Images and video copied into
hackathon/deck/assets/; relative paths only. - Colours only from the tokens in
deck.css. A new colour is a design change: stop and ask. - ≤ 30 words, ≤ 3 bullets, ≥ 24 px, inside the 64 px safe area.
Step 3 — QA loop
Once: cd ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/qa && npm i && npx playwright install chromium. Then:
node ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/qa/qa.ts hackathon/deck/index.html --out hackathon/deck/out --minutes <limit in minutes, a number>. It renders every slide,
fails on overflow, safe area, small text, word and bullet counts, fonts not loaded, broken or
upscaled images, missing video, off-token colours and > 9 slides, exports the PDF and checks
its page count, and prints talk time from the notes.
Then read the contact sheet and every slide at 960×540 (a projector proxy):
- one idea, takeaway readable in 5 seconds
- consistent alignment and spacing with the other slides
- every number on a slide is in
facts.md
Fix only failing slides; re-run. At most 3 rounds per slide; still failing → report it.
Step 4 — output
hackathon/deck/index.html (present: open in a browser, S for speaker view),
hackathon/deck/out/deck.pdf, hackathon/deck/out/slide-*.png, contact-sheet.png.
QA's Chromium can't play H.264, so it checks the video file and poster exist; open the deck in Chrome once to see it play.
pptx in arguments → also one PPTX of full-slide images with notes (not editable; say so).
Print: slide count, talk time vs limit, QA result, and the manual list: team photo, live-state screenshots not yet captured, test on the venue projector.
What QA cannot check: whether the deck persuades, or how the venue projector renders it.
Language
lang: uk → slide text and notes in Ukrainian; product names, ids and UI labels stay as in the product.
Writing
One line where one line does. Answer first. State the fact, not the story behind it — no narrating what was tried, no paragraph restating the line above. Two things always stay: why a non-obvious decision was made, and what a check cannot do. Caveats and risks still get said, one line each.
Outcome: success = QA passes, PDF exported · partial = deck built, QA fails left · failed = no deck.
Report
Last step, every run, whatever the outcome: write .ccs/reports/<skill>/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>.md
at the repo root, and add .ccs/ to .git/info/exclude if missing. One line per field,
no secrets, tokens or customer data. Print the path.
---
skill: <skill>
date: <YYYY-MM-DD>
repo: <owner/name>
target: <argument, one line>
outcome: success | partial | failed
learned: false
---
Used: <tools, CLIs, MCPs, files that did the work>
Found: <the result, one or two lines>
Friction: <what slowed or blocked it; a user correction; "none">Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

