x-thread-builder
Skill163 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Build a long-form X (Twitter) thread (tweetstorm) using a 2026 thread formula (listicle-thread, story thread, curiosity-gap opener, how-I teardown), picked by goal (bookmarks, likes, reposts, replies). Structures tweet 1 as a promise plus open loop, paces one beat per tweet, and closes for the repost. Publishes via Publora, which auto-splits long content into a numbered (1/N) thread. Not for single tweets (use x-post-writer) or auditing a draft (use x-humanizer --mode audit).
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- megandmartin/agent-skills-repotheir own version, first seen Jul 24, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- megandmartin/agent-skills-repo★ 3same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- x-marketingSkill
- x-audience-insightsSkill
- x-content-plannerSkill
- x-hook-extractorSkill
- x-humanizerSkill
- x-post-writerSkill
- x-profile-optimizerSkill
- x-reply-drafterSkill
- x-repurposerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 66
Keep it under 280 chars on a standard account.
- Very specific: line 82
Optional audit: Run x-humanizer --mode audit on the assembled thread.
- Very specific: line 85
On approval: Call lib.publish(kind="thread", draft_text=<full thread with --- breaks>, target_url="https://x.com/compose/tweet", …
- Distinctive: line 97
Keep each tweet under 280 chars on a standard account (emoji = 2 chars).
- Distinctive: line 99
No external link in tweet 1.
- Distinctive: line 104
Only ship a Story Thread (X8) built on a true story.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
X Thread Builder
Build tweetstorms that get read all the way down. On X, tweet 1 is the entire funnel: it has to promise a payoff and open a loop, or no one taps "Show this thread." Everything after only matters if tweet 1 earns the tap.
When to use
- User says "turn this into a thread" or "write me a thread about X"
- The idea is a list where each item needs teaching, a story with a build, a surprising result with a mechanism, or a repeatable process
- User has a single tweet that is trying to do too much and should be a thread
Formulas this skill uses (thread shapes)
| Code | Formula | Primary goal | Best for |
| X7 | Listicle-Thread Promise | bookmarks | numbered teaching thread, one item per tweet |
| X8 | Story Thread | likes, reposts | a real narrative with a build and a turn |
| X9 | Curiosity-Gap Opener | replies, bookmarks | a surprising result, mechanism withheld |
| X10 | How-I Teardown | bookmarks | a repeatable process you ran yourself |
Full skeletons in ../../references/hook-formulas.md. For single tweets
(X1-X6), use x-post-writer.
Pick by goal first
| Goal | Reach for |
| Bookmarks | X7, X10, X9 |
| Likes | X8 |
| Reposts | X8 |
| Replies | X9 |
How Publora splits a thread
Pass the full thread as one content string. Publora auto-splits it:
- at paragraph breaks (
\n\n) first, - then at sentence endings,
- then at word boundaries as a fallback,
- and adds
(1/N)markers, reserving ~8 chars per tweet for the marker.
For full control of where each tweet breaks, hand-split with a --- separator
on its own line between tweets. The skill defaults to hand-splitting with ---
so the user sees exactly how the thread will land before approving.
Steps
Voice profile first (all drafts). If ../../references/voice-profile.md has filled: yes, load it and match the user's voice fingerprint, hard rules, and CTA/link style throughout. If it is not filled, mention once that x-humanizer --mode profile can learn their voice from a few posts, then proceed with the generic voice rules.
Story bank next. If ../../references/story-bank.md has filled: yes, load it and take every concrete detail (numbers, dates, named projects, positions) from there instead of asking mid-draft. Never invent a figure, a date or a client name that is not in the bank or supplied by the user in this conversation. If the bank has nothing that fits, ask the user, or say once that x-humanizer --mode interview fills it in 20 to 40 minutes. A draft with a plausible invented number is worse than a draft with none: one is vague, the other is a retraction.
- Gather inputs. Topic, the raw material (notes, a transcript, a result), target audience, and the goal (bookmarks / likes / reposts / replies).
- Pick the formula from the goal table, confirm it fits the material.
- Write tweet 1. This is 80% of the work:
- Promise a specific payoff (a number, a named result, a clear list count).
- Open a loop the reader has to resolve ("most people get 3 of them wrong", "I did not expect why").
- Keep it under 280 chars on a standard account. It must stop the scroll alone.
- Pace the body. One beat or one item per tweet. Front-load the strongest item or beat at position 1-2; tap-through decays with depth. Target 5-9 tweets for teaching/list threads; longer only for a strong story.
- Make each tweet stand alone. A reader landing mid-thread from a quote tweet should still get something.
- Write the closer. The last tweet earns the repost and the follow. End on the most quotable line, then one clear ask (bookmark, follow, or "reply with yours"), not both.
- Humanizer pass on every tweet. Scrub 2026 AI vocab by density, cap em
dashes (at most one per tweet, never swap one for a period), break stacked
triads and reveal bridges. Let tweet length vary only as the material
varies: never insert a 3-word punch tweet for rhythm, never alternate
long/short, and touch rhythm only if the whole thread reads machine-flat.
Canonical rules:
x-humanizerV3. - Optional audit. Run
x-humanizer --mode auditon the assembled thread. - Approval card. Show the thread tweet-by-tweet with per-tweet char counts,
total tweet count, the formula, and the goal. Confirm any
---breaks. - On approval. Call
lib.publish(kind="thread", draft_text=<full thread with --- breaks>, target_url="https://x.com/compose/tweet", platforms=[<X_PLATFORM_ID>], scheduled_time=<iso_or_None>). Publora posts the chain in one call and returns apostGroupId.
Hard rules
Global voice rules: see root SKILL.md Voice rules. Additional skill-specific
rules:
- Tweet 1 must contain a real promise and an open loop. A bare "A thread:" label is not a hook.
- Keep each tweet under 280 chars on a standard account (emoji = 2 chars).
- Front-load value. Never bury the best item at the end of a teaching thread.
- No external link in tweet 1. Put links in a later tweet or a reply.
- Natural rhythm, not manufactured variance. A long thread where every tweet is the same length and none carries a real clause reads machine-flat; fix that one thing. Never pad or chop tweets to create variance, and never insert a punch tweet: the inserted punch is the humanizer fingerprint.
- Only ship a Story Thread (X8) built on a true story. Readers punish manufactured stakes.
Anti-patterns (skill will refuse)
- Tweet 1 that closes its own loop (no reason to expand).
- Over-promising in tweet 1 and under-delivering in the body.
- Vague how-to steps ("be consistent", "add value") in an X10 teardown.
- Padding to hit a round number of tweets.
- Em dashes above the cap (more than one in a tweet), AI vocab clusters, ALL CAPS openers.
- "The result?" reveals, "No X. No Y. Just Z." staccato stacks, one-word tweets for drama.
- Announced candor ("Let me be honest", "not gonna lie") with no dated fact behind it.
- Engagement-bait closers ("RT if this helped").
Resources
../../references/hook-formulas.md- X7-X10 thread skeletons with worked shapes../../references/algorithm-heuristics.md- thread length, tap-through decay, signalsreferences/thread-structure.md- per-position pacing and the closer playbook
Related skills
x-post-writer- when the idea is really just one tweetx-humanizer- scrub each tweet, or--mode auditthe whole threadx-hook-extractor- lift the structure from a viral thread you admirex-content-planner- schedule threads into a weekly cadence
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

