agentleFS
serejarisserejaris/ris-claude-code/skills/meeting-copilot/SKILL.md

meeting-copilot

Skill243 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when preparing for, running, or closing a live meeting with an AI assistant dashboard. Triggers on "meeting copilot", "live copilot", "prepare for a call", "update copilot", "close the session", or requests to turn transcript chunks into meeting questions, topic maps, decisions, and follow-ups.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

15 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈14

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Create and maintain a local HTML dashboard for a live meeting.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Use one of three modes:

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    If the app uses ES modules, serve it over HTTP:

    line 58
  4. Distinctive:

    Use suffix diffing so the agent processes only the new part:

    line 71
  5. Very specific:

    Update only live tabs: questions.js, topics.js, decisions.js, followups.js.

    line 98
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not update long-term profile or history files during UPDATE unless the user asks.

    line 102
  7. Distinctive:

    Use 3 to 6 groups, with 3 to 6 questions per group:

    line 108
  8. Distinctive:

    Use a compact visual language:

    line 131
  9. Distinctive:

    If using a graph, include only topics, projects, concepts, decisions, and risks.

    line 137
  10. Distinctive:

    Write a concise meeting summary.

    line 144
  11. Distinctive:

    Update the user's chosen system of record, for example CRM, project issue, notes folder, or ticket.

    line 146
  12. Distinctive:

    Create a follow-up message draft.

    line 147
  13. Distinctive:

    If requested, create a sanitized export with names, company data, private links, and raw transcript removed.

    line 148
  14. Distinctive:

    Never put these in public artifacts:

    line 171
  15. Distinctive:

    Before calling the work done:

    line 187

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Meeting Copilot

Create and maintain a local HTML dashboard for a live meeting. The dashboard gives the user a second-screen view of context, questions, topic progress, decisions, risks, and follow-ups while the call is happening.

This skill is designed for private workspaces. Do not publish raw transcripts, client names, personal notes, or generated meeting artifacts unless the user explicitly asks for a sanitized export.

Modes

Use one of three modes:

ModeWhenOutput
CREATEBefore the meetingA local dashboard app with prepared context and questions
UPDATEDuring the meetingUpdated questions, topics, decisions, risks, and follow-ups from transcript chunks
CLOSEAfter the meetingFinal summary, action items, CRM or notes updates, and optional sanitized export

CREATE

Inputs:

  • meeting title or contact name
  • meeting type, for example discovery, sales, mentoring, support, hiring, partnership
  • date
  • available context files, if any
  • output directory

Create this structure:

YYYY-MM-DD-meeting-copilot/
  app/
    index.html
    app.js
    components.js
    styles.css
    tabs/
      briefing.js
      questions.js
      topics.js
      decisions.js
      followups.js
  state/
    transcript.txt
    diff.py

Dashboard tabs:

  • briefing.js: meeting goal, known context, participants, constraints
  • questions.js: grouped live questions
  • topics.js: planned and discussed topics
  • decisions.js: decisions, risks, blockers, open loops
  • followups.js: action items, owners, due dates, next message draft

If the app uses ES modules, serve it over HTTP:

cd YYYY-MM-DD-meeting-copilot/app
python3 -m http.server 8080

Then open http://127.0.0.1:8080.

UPDATE

Input is usually a full transcript copied from a transcription tool. Treat it as sensitive.

Use suffix diffing so the agent processes only the new part:

#!/usr/bin/env python3
import pathlib
import sys

baseline = pathlib.Path(__file__).parent / "transcript.txt"
old = baseline.read_text() if baseline.exists() else ""
new = sys.stdin.read()
old_s = old.strip()
new_s = new.strip()

if not old_s:
    sys.stdout.write(new)
elif new_s.startswith(old_s):
    sys.stdout.write(new_s[len(old_s):].lstrip())
else:
    sys.stderr.write("[diff] baseline mismatch; using full transcript\n")
    sys.stdout.write(new)

Recommended update flow:

  1. Save incoming transcript to state/transcript-new.txt.
  2. Run python3 state/diff.py < state/transcript-new.txt > state/delta.txt.
  3. Read state/delta.txt.
  4. Update only live tabs: questions.js, topics.js, decisions.js, followups.js.
  5. Move state/transcript-new.txt to state/transcript.txt.
  6. Tell the user what changed and ask them to refresh the dashboard.

Do not update long-term profile or history files during UPDATE unless the user asks. Keep the live loop fast.

Question Design

Group questions by topic. Avoid one long list.

Use 3 to 6 groups, with 3 to 6 questions per group:

function questionGroup(title, items) {
  if (!items.length) return "";
  return card(title, `<ul>${items.map((item) => `<li>${item}</li>`).join("")}</ul>`);
}

Good groups:

  • Check-in and goal
  • Business context
  • Budget, timeline, and constraints
  • Decision criteria
  • Risks and blockers
  • Next steps

Mark critical questions clearly, especially around money, deadlines, authority, legal constraints, and irreversible decisions.

Topic Map

Track meeting flow as planned, discussed, skipped, or unresolved.

Use a compact visual language:

  • filled marker: discussed
  • hollow marker: planned but not reached
  • warning marker: blocked or risky
  • check marker: decided

If using a graph, include only topics, projects, concepts, decisions, and risks. Do not put private participant names into public exports.

CLOSE

At the end of the meeting:

  1. Process the final transcript chunk.
  2. Write a concise meeting summary.
  3. Extract decisions, action items, owners, deadlines, and open questions.
  4. Update the user's chosen system of record, for example CRM, project issue, notes folder, or ticket.
  5. Create a follow-up message draft.
  6. If requested, create a sanitized export with names, company data, private links, and raw transcript removed.

Close output template:

# Meeting Summary

## Outcome

## Decisions

## Action Items

| Item | Owner | Due | Status |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

## Open Questions

## Follow-up Draft

Privacy Rules

Never put these in public artifacts:

  • raw transcript
  • private names, emails, handles, phone numbers
  • company secrets, pricing, revenue, pipeline data
  • private repository paths or URLs
  • authentication tokens, meeting links, calendar links
  • internal prompts, model names, or routing rules that expose private operations

For public examples, use placeholders:

  • Participant A
  • Company X
  • ~/workspace/crm
  • https://example.com/private-doc

Quality Bar

Before calling the work done:

  • dashboard opens locally
  • tabs render without console-breaking syntax errors
  • sensitive data is not present in public docs
  • close summary has decisions and action items separated
  • generated public export is clearly marked as sanitized

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.