agentleFS
sebssebs/rewelo/.claude/skills/reprioritize/SKILL.md

reprioritize

Skill2 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub

Reassess backlog priorities after a significant event

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use ticket_list to fetch all active tickets (exclude state:done) (ticket_list returns 100 tickets per call: page with offset until you have …

    line 14
  2. Very specific:

    Ask the user: "Apply these score changes?" If confirmed, use ticket_update for each changed ticket.

    line 41

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Continuous Reprioritization

Reassess priorities for project $0 in light of: $1

Procedure

  1. Use ticket_list to fetch all active tickets (exclude state:done) (ticket_list returns 100 tickets per call: page with offset until you have total of them)
  2. Analyze the event described by the user
  3. Once you have chosen new scores, call simulate with them as changes: it ranks the open tickets (not state:done) by weighted priority with the project's weights, before and after, and returns each ticket's rank and priority in both. That is the baseline and the proposal, among the same tickets. Don't take the baseline from calc_priority: it ranks done tickets too, so its ranks don't match the active tickets'

Reassessment

For each ticket, consider whether the event changes:

  • Benefit: Does the event make this feature more or less valuable?
  • Penalty: Does the event increase or decrease the cost of not doing this?
  • Estimate: Does the event change the effort (e.g. new tooling available)?
  • Risk: Does the event add or remove uncertainty?

Output

Present a before/after comparison:

TicketOld PriorityOld RankSuggested Scores (B/P/E/R)New PriorityNew RankChange

Highlight tickets that moved more than 2 positions.

Rationale

For each proposed change, explain in one sentence why the event affects that ticket's scores.

Apply changes

Ask the user: "Apply these score changes?" If confirmed, use ticket_update for each changed ticket. Do NOT update without confirmation.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.