plan-sprint
Skill2 starsChanged 50 days agoMITView on GitHub
Propose a sprint backlog from prioritized tickets based on team capacity
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- salvo8519/fairmarktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jrjsmrtn/project-orchestration-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- link7373/agentic-pmotheir own version, first seen Aug 9, 2026
- trapajim/skillstheir own version, first seen May 11, 2026
- nobufumi-tego/gcp-agile-templatetheir own version, first seen May 4, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- jrjsmrtn/project-orchestration-skills★ 17same name
- trapajim/skills★ 2same name
- link7373/agentic-pmo★ 1same name
- salvo8519/fairmark★ 1same name
- nobufumi-tego/gcp-agile-template★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- flow-metricsSkill
- intakeSkill
- portfolioSkill
- reprioritizeSkill
- retro-accuracySkill
- sliceSkill
- standupSkill
- what-ifSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Use ticket_list to fetch all tickets in the project (ticket_list returns 100 tickets per call: page with offset until you have total of …
- Very specific: line 15
Use weight_get to read the project's stored weight configuration
- Very specific: line 16
Use calc_priority (with the project weights) to get the weighted priority ranking
- Distinctive: line 22
Before selection, build a dependency graph in a single call:
- Very specific: line 24
Call relation_list_all once to get every relation in the project
- Distinctive: line 36
Check eligibility (all dependencies satisfied per rules above)
- Very specific: line 37
If eligible and fits within remaining capacity (estimate + risk), select it
- Distinctive: line 38
If not eligible because a dependency is also a candidate, try to pull the dependency in first (if it fits).
- Distinctive: line 39
If not eligible and the dependency is not a candidate (e.g.
- Distinctive: line 58
Trade-off analysis: if swapping the lowest-priority selected ticket for a smaller unselected ticket would improve total value
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Sprint Planning Copilot
Plan a sprint for project $0 with a capacity of $1 effort points (default: 20 if not provided).
Procedure
- Use
ticket_listto fetch all tickets in the project (ticket_listreturns 100 tickets per call: page withoffsetuntil you havetotalof them) - Use
weight_getto read the project's stored weight configuration - Use
calc_priority(with the project weights) to get the weighted priority ranking - Take the open tickets:
ticket_listwithexcludeTags: ["state:wip", "state:done"]. A ticket without a state tag is in the backlog too: new tickets have none until someone tags them - Sort by weighted priority (highest first)
Dependency analysis
Before selection, build a dependency graph in a single call:
- Call
relation_list_allonce to get every relation in the project - Filter to
blocks/depends-on/is-blocked-by/is-depended-on-byrelation types - Build a map:
ticket → set of tickets it depends on
A ticket is eligible only when all of its dependencies are either:
- Already tagged
state:done, OR - Already selected earlier in the current sprint plan
Sprint selection
Walk the priority-sorted candidates. For each ticket:
- Check eligibility (all dependencies satisfied per rules above)
- If eligible and fits within remaining capacity (
estimate + risk), select it - If not eligible because a dependency is also a candidate, try to pull the dependency in first (if it fits). This lets a high-value ticket pull its blocker into the sprint.
- If not eligible and the dependency is not a candidate (e.g. not in backlog), skip and flag it
Continue until capacity is exhausted or no more eligible tickets remain.
Output
Sprint backlog
| # | Ticket | Weighted Priority | Cost (E+R) | Cumulative | Pulled by |
The "Pulled by" column shows which higher-priority ticket caused a dependency to be included ahead of its natural rank. Leave empty for tickets selected on their own merit.
Sprint summary
- Total value (sum of benefit + penalty for selected tickets)
- Total weighted priority (sum of weighted priorities)
- Remaining capacity (if any)
- First ticket cut and what including it would cost
- Trade-off analysis: if swapping the lowest-priority selected ticket for a smaller unselected ticket would improve total value
Dependency warnings
List any tickets that were skipped due to unresolved dependencies:
| Ticket | Priority | Blocked by | Blocker state |
Explain what would need to happen to unblock each one.
Weight configuration used
Show the w1–w4 values that drove the ranking, so the team knows how priorities were calculated. If all defaults (1.5), note that custom weights could be set to tune the ranking.
Optional
If the user confirms, tag selected tickets with a tag for this sprint, e.g. sprint:2026-w39, using tag_assign. Sprint membership gets its own prefix: a ticket holds one value per prefix, so a state: value for it would be replaced as soon as work on the ticket starts (state:wip) or ends (state:done).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

