agentleFS
sbrudzsbrudz/agent-skills/skills/react-best-practices/SKILL.md

react-best-practices

Skill2 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when reviewing React component code during code quality review, when the diff contains .tsx or .jsx files, or when reviewing components that use React hooks, state management, or data fetching patterns

66 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use composition-patterns, python-best-practices and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • eeaSkill

    composition-patterns

    React composition patterns that scale. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or designing reusable APIs. Triggers on tasks involving compound components, render props, context providers, or component architecture. Includes React 19 API changes.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • jefflesterSkill

    python-best-practices

    Python development best practices including PEP 8 style guidelines, type hints, docstring conventions, and common patterns. Use when writing or modifying Python code.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    planning-with-files

    **USE THIS FOR COMPLEX TASKS.** Implements Manus-style file-based planning for multi-step tasks. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md in .agent_cache/<task-name>/. Use when: implementing multiple APIs, refactoring modules, research tasks, or ANY task requiring >5 tool calls.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • VercelSkill

    vercel-deploy

    Deploy applications and websites to Vercel with a claimable preview. Use when the user requests deployment actions like "deploy my app", "deploy and give me the link", "push this live", or "create a preview deployment". No authentication required - returns preview URL and claimable deployment link.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    code-quality

    Statically check changed C# against the same deterministic rules github-code-quality[bot] runs on pull requests, so a contributor can fix likely findings before opening the PR and keep the bot's inline comments to a minimum. Activate when a contributor asks to "check code quality", "run code quality on my changes", "will the code quality bot complain", "pre-check before I open the PR", "code quality check", or similar. Scoped to C#. Reads the diff and compares it against the enumerated csharp-code-quality rule set below — no CodeQL download or build required. This is a fast approximation of a dataflow engine, not a reproduction; report accordingly. Does NOT apply fixes unless explicitly asked.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • VercelSkill

    web-design-guidelines

    Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • +1 more from microsoft

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 56 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Check each section below. Flag violations as Important or Minor per the standard review severity levels.

    line 18
  2. Very specific:

    Check package.json for the React version.

    line 72
  3. Very specific:

    useFormStatus rule: Must be called from a child component rendered inside the <form>, not in the same component that renders the form.

    line 85
  4. Distinctive:

    Every interactive element must work with keyboard (Tab, Enter, Space, Escape, Arrow keys)

    line 98
  5. Very specific:

    Use userEvent (simulates real user behavior: focus, keyboard, hover) not fireEvent (dispatches a single DOM event)

    line 114
  6. Distinctive:

    NOT implementation details — internal state, hook calls, re-render counts, component instance methods

    line 118
  7. Distinctive:

    If you're testing mock behavior instead of real behavior, the test is wrong

    line 122

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 56 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

React Best Practices for Code Review

Supplement to the standard code review checklist. Covers judgment calls that linters and static analysis cannot catch.

When to Use

During code review when the diff contains React code (.tsx, .jsx, or .ts files importing from "react").

Apply these checks after the standard code quality review, as an additional pass.

Review Checklist

Check each section below. Flag violations as Important or Minor per the standard review severity levels.

1. Component Responsibility & Size

A component is too large when it mixes concerns, not when it exceeds a line count.

Flag when a single component does more than one of:

  • Renders UI (view layer)
  • Contains business logic (data transformation, validation, calculations)
  • Manages complex state interactions (multiple related useState + useEffect)
  • Fetches data

The fix pattern:

  • View logic stays in the component (JSX, conditional rendering, layout)
  • Business logic moves to pure functions (sorting, filtering, formatting, validation). Pure functions are trivially testable without rendering.
  • Complex state + effects move to custom hooks (useOrders, useAuth, useSettings). A hook is "complex" when it combines multiple useState calls that interact with each other or with useEffect.
// BAD: all mixed in one component
function Dashboard() {
  const [orders, setOrders] = useState([]);
  const [sorted, setSorted] = useState([]);
  useEffect(() => { fetch(/*...*/) }, []);
  useEffect(() => { setSorted(orders.sort(/*...*/)) }, [orders]);
  const formatPrice = (n: number) => /*...*/;
  return <table>...</table>;
}

// GOOD: separated by responsibility
function Dashboard() {
  const { orders, sort, sortField } = useOrders();  // custom hook: state + fetching
  return <OrdersTable orders={orders} onSort={sort} sortField={sortField} />;
}
// sortOrders(), formatPrice() are pure functions in a utils file

2. useEffect Misuse

Linters catch missing dependencies. They cannot catch unnecessary effects.

Flag these patterns:

PatternFix
Effect computes derived state (useEffect + setState from other state)Compute during render or useMemo
Effect resets state when a prop changesUse key on the component instead
Chain of effects (A sets state, triggers B, triggers C)Do the work in one event handler
User-driven side effect in useEffect instead of event handlerMove to the handler that caused it
Effect without cleanup for subscriptions, timers, or fetchAdd cleanup function with AbortController

useEffect is ONLY for synchronizing with external systems (subscriptions, timers, DOM manipulation, third-party widgets).

3. React Version-Appropriate Patterns

Check package.json for the React version. Review for patterns appropriate to that version.

React 19+ apps should use:

Instead ofUse
Manual loading/error/data state for fetches<Suspense> boundaries + Server Components for data fetching
onSubmit + useState for form submission stateuseActionState for form action + state, useFormStatus for pending UI
useEffect to resolve promisesuse() hook
Defensive React.memo, useMemo, useCallbackReact Compiler handles memoization automatically. Only add manual memoization when a third-party library requires stable identity, or as an explicit useEffect dependency.

useActionState signature reminder: (prevState, formData) => newState — first arg is previous state, not formData. Imported from "react", not "react-dom".

useFormStatus rule: Must be called from a child component rendered inside the <form>, not in the same component that renders the form.

4. Accessibility Beyond Linting

eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y catches static markup issues. These behavioral issues require judgment:

Focus management:

  • Modal/dialog: trap focus inside, return focus to trigger on close
  • Route changes in SPAs: announce new page to screen readers
  • Form errors: move focus to error summary or first invalid field
  • Success/error messages: use role="alert" or aria-live="polite" so screen readers announce them

Keyboard navigation:

  • Every interactive element must work with keyboard (Tab, Enter, Space, Escape, Arrow keys)
  • <div onClick> is never a button — use <button> (linter catches some, not all)
  • Custom sort controls, dropdowns, tabs need keyboard handlers

Color:

  • Status indicators (error, success, pending) must not rely on color alone — add icons, text labels, or patterns

5. Testing Practices

Query priority (most to least preferred):

  1. getByRole — validates accessibility at the same time
  2. getByLabelText — best for form fields
  3. getByText — for non-interactive content
  4. getByTestId — last resort only

Interaction:

  • Use userEvent (simulates real user behavior: focus, keyboard, hover) not fireEvent (dispatches a single DOM event)

What to test:

  • What the user sees and does — rendered output, interaction results, accessible names
  • NOT implementation details — internal state, hook calls, re-render counts, component instance methods

Mocking:

  • Mock at the network boundary with MSW (Mock Service Worker), not by replacing global.fetch or mocking component imports
  • If you're testing mock behavior instead of real behavior, the test is wrong

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.