professional-profile-brief
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Prepare a busy professional for a meeting, introduction, networking conversation, interview, or other professional interaction by quickly explaining who a person is and how to open the conversation well. Use this skill whenever the user says things like "brief me on [Name]", "I'm meeting [Name] tomorrow", "prep me for a meeting/intro with this person", "help me understand this person's background", "profile brief", "pre-meeting prep", "who is [Name]", or pastes a LinkedIn profile, bio, company page, article, podcast page, calendar invite, meeting notes, or email and wants to understand the person before talking to them. Trigger even if the user just drops a name or a LinkedIn URL plus a meeting context. This is for understanding an individual person. Do NOT use for researching a company — use the company-first-pass or private-company-tear-sheet skill. Do NOT use for diligence on a vendor, partner, or other counterparty — use the counterparty-diligence skill. It is NOT a sales-automation, scraping, or bulk-prospecting tool and does NOT draft outreach by default.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- latour-ai/skillsedited, first seen Oct 19, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- latour-ai/skills★ 6991% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository39 other files it gives its agents.
- audit-request-binderSkill
- business-one-pagerSkill
- call-notes-followupSkill
- company-first-passSkill
- conference-prep-plannerSkill
- contract-obligations-extractorSkill
- counterparty-diligenceSkill
- decision-memo-drafterSkill
- document-redline-diffSkill
- executive-briefingSkill
- expert-interview-synthesisSkill
- hundred-day-plan-drafterSkill
- inbox-triageSkill
- intro-email-generatorSkill
- linkedin-post-generatorSkill
- marketing-claims-prescreenSkill
- market-map-builderSkill
- meeting-minutes-generatorSkill
- nda-reviewSkill
- payout-reconciliation-checkerSkill
- performance-attribution-narratorSkill
- periodic-report-synthesizerSkill
- podcast-episode-analyzerSkill
- presentation-transcript-extractorSkill
- private-company-tear-sheetSkill
- project-folder-organizerSkill
- proposal-first-passSkill
- questionnaire-red-flag-scannerSkill
- questionnaire-response-drafterSkill
- red-team-premortemSkill
- relationship-status-summarizerSkill
- side-letter-term-extractorSkill
- skill-idea-generatorSkill
- stakeholder-update-generatorSkill
- teach-meSkill
- unit-economics-memoSkill
- watchlist-news-alertSkill
- weekly-recap-writerSkill
- workflow-to-ai-solverSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
19 rules. About 0 are common, 18 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈18
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 42
Use any relevant source available to you, prioritizing primary and authoritative ones:
- Very specific: line 51
If browser, Chrome, or MCP tools are available, use them to review public information.
- Distinctive: line 53
Only include a fact if it is sourced: Do not guess URLs, titles, or affiliations.
- Distinctive: line 59
Use public information only.
- Distinctive: line 60
Do not scrape LinkedIn or any site in bulk.
- Distinctive: line 61
Do not automate connection requests or messages.
- Distinctive: line 62
Do not fabricate mutual connections.
- Distinctive: line 63
Do not infer sensitive personal attributes (e.g., health, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, political affiliation, family status).
- Distinctive: line 64
Do not include private personal details unless the user provided them and they are professionally relevant.
- Distinctive: line 65
Do not use creepy personalization, manufactured familiarity, or flattery.
- Distinctive: line 66
Do not guess about someone's personal life or overconfidently psychologize them.
- Distinctive: line 67
Do not write "I saw on LinkedIn..." unless the information was actually sourced from LinkedIn.
- Distinctive: line 71
Keep the final brief to 500 words maximum unless the user explicitly asks for more depth.
- Distinctive: line 73
ALWAYS use this exact section structure:
- Distinctive: line 119
If you cannot reach LinkedIn or browser tools, still help — don't stall.
- Distinctive: line 121
Use whatever other public sources you can reach.
- Distinctive: line 122
Use all user-provided context.
- Distinctive: line 128
Before returning the brief, confirm:
- Distinctive: line 149
Use intro-email-generator when the brief leads to an introduction you need to draft, and relationship-status-summarizer when there's an …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Professional Profile Brief
Produce a concise, relationship-aware prep note that helps a busy professional walk into a meeting understanding who the other person is, why they matter, and how to open the conversation naturally. The output should read like an executive assistant's pre-meeting brief — specific, useful, and professionally appropriate — not a sales script and not a dossier.
Inputs
Accept any of the following, in any combination:
- A person's name and/or LinkedIn URL
- Pasted profile text, bio, or company "About" page
- An article, interview, or podcast appearance
- A calendar invite, email thread, or prior meeting notes
- Any user-provided background
The meeting context (what the meeting is for — a sales call, a partnership conversation, a job interview, a board introduction, a recruiting conversation, a donor meeting, a press interview) makes the brief sharper. If it's missing and not obvious, you can still produce the brief — just note in the relevant sections what context would tighten it.
Sourcing
Use any relevant source available to you, prioritizing primary and authoritative ones:
- LinkedIn profile and recent LinkedIn posts
- Company website and the person's bio page
- Personal website
- Podcast appearances, articles, and interviews
- General web/search results
- Public professional databases
- User-provided notes, emails, prior meeting notes, calendar invites
If browser, Chrome, or MCP tools are available, use them to review public information. If web_search is available, use it to confirm current role, company, and any notable recent activity rather than relying on memory.
Only include a fact if it is sourced. Do not guess URLs, titles, or affiliations. If you can't confirm something, it belongs in "Unknowns / Things to Confirm," not in the body.
Hard Rules (non-negotiable)
These protect the user's reputation and the subject's privacy. A brief that crosses these lines is worse than no brief.
- Use public information only.
- Do not scrape LinkedIn or any site in bulk; do not collect or export contact lists.
- Do not automate connection requests or messages.
- Do not fabricate mutual connections. If you can't verify a shared connection, don't claim one.
- Do not infer sensitive personal attributes (e.g., health, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, political affiliation, family status).
- Do not include private personal details unless the user provided them and they are professionally relevant.
- Do not use creepy personalization, manufactured familiarity, or flattery.
- Do not guess about someone's personal life or overconfidently psychologize them.
- Do not write "I saw on LinkedIn..." unless the information was actually sourced from LinkedIn. Attribute honestly.
Output
Keep the final brief to 500 words maximum unless the user explicitly asks for more depth. Use a neutral, executive-assistant voice: concise, specific, free of filler, no hype. Do not include an outreach draft unless the user explicitly asks for one.
ALWAYS use this exact section structure:
# Professional Profile Brief: [Person Name]
## 1. Summary
[2–4 sentences: who they are and why they matter for this meeting.]
## 2. Current Role
- **Title:** [current title]
- **Company / Organization:** [organization]
- **Likely responsibilities / scope:** [based only on available info]
## 3. Organization Description
[1–3 sentences: what the organization does and why it may matter for the conversation.]
## 4. Career Background
[Their professional arc: notable roles, transitions, industries, recurring themes, accomplishments.]
## 5. What They Likely Care About
[INFERENCE. Open with framing like "Based on their role and public activity, they may care about…" Do not present inferred motivations as fact.]
## 6. Relationship Hooks
[Specific, verifiable connection points only. See list below. Omit the section's bullets you can't support; if none, say so plainly.]
## 7. Conversation Angles
[3–5 specific ways to open or guide the conversation. Relationship-building, not selling.]
## 8. Smart Questions
[3–5 thoughtful, person-specific questions grounded in their background. No generic questions.]
## 9. Unknowns / Things to Confirm
[What is unclear or should not be assumed.]
## 10. Sources Used
[Each source by name, with date where available. If sources were limited, say so.]Section guidance
- Section 5 must be clearly labeled as inference. Tie every inference to something observable (a role, a post, an interview), and phrase it as a possibility, not a finding.
- Section 6 (Relationship Hooks) — useful, verifiable connection points such as: shared employers, schools, cities, industries, professional communities, or backers; mutual connections (only if real); similar career transitions; recent posts or ideas; public professional interests. Include a personal detail only if it is professionally appropriate and publicly available or user-provided. When in doubt, leave it out.
- Section 7 vs. Section 8 — angles are openers and threads to pull on; questions are specific things to actually ask. Both should be impossible to copy-paste into a brief for a different person.
No-Access Mode
If you cannot reach LinkedIn or browser tools, still help — don't stall.
- Use whatever other public sources you can reach.
- Use all user-provided context.
- Produce a lightweight version of the brief using the same structure, filling what you can and being explicit about thin sections.
- Close by inviting the user to paste the LinkedIn profile, bio, company page, recent article, or calendar invite for a stronger brief — name the specific input that would help most.
Quality Checks
Before returning the brief, confirm:
- 500 words or fewer (unless the user asked for more).
- It actually helps the user open the meeting well.
- It reads like an executive-assistant prep note — neutral, specific, no filler or flattery.
- Relationship hooks are specific and professionally appropriate.
- Inferences (esp. Section 5) are labeled as inferences, not stated as fact.
- No sensitive personal attributes are inferred.
- No private or creepy details included.
- No mutual connections fabricated.
- No outreach draft unless explicitly requested.
- Sources are listed; unknowns are clearly separated from facts.
Example User Prompts
- "Use this skill to brief me on Jane Doe. I'm meeting her tomorrow about a potential partnership and want to understand her background and how to open the conversation."
- "Create a professional profile brief from this LinkedIn profile and company bio." [pastes both]
- "I'm interviewing with this VP of Engineering on Thursday. Use her bio, recent conference talk, and the calendar invite to prep me for a 30-minute conversation."
- "LinkedIn is blocked, but here's the hospital administrator's bio and a few notes from our last call. Make the best lightweight brief you can."
Works well with
Use intro-email-generator when the brief leads to an introduction you need to draft, and relationship-status-summarizer when there's an existing email history with the person worth reviewing first.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

