agentleFS
sadpig70sadpig70/HELIX/skills/pgf/SKILL.md

pgf

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

PGF (PPR/Gantree Framework) — AI-native design/execution framework. Supports system architecture design, work planning, autonomous execution, idea discovery, and full creation cycles. Gantree hierarchical decomposition + PPR pseudo-code for AI-comprehensible specifications. Triggers: 설계해줘, 구조 설계, 작업 분해, 아키텍처, 모듈 분리, 작업 계획, WORKPLAN, 프로젝트 구조화, Gantree, PPR, PGF, 발견, 창조, design, plan, execute, discover, create

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read status-*.json for execution progress (summary.done / summary.total)

    line 35
  2. Very specific:

    Check .pgf/runtime/pgf-loop-state.json for active pgf-loop status.

    line 36
  3. Very specific:

    All other notation rules (5-level depth, [parallel], @dep:, PPR def blocks, Convergence Loop, Failure Strategy, atomicity 15-minute rule) …

    line 52
  4. Very specific:

    No mode keyword → infer from context (e.g., presence of files in .pgf/ directory)

    line 177

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

PGF (PPR/Gantree Framework) v2.5

PG가 프로그래밍 언어라면, PGF는 라이브러리다. PG로 자주 실행하는 유용한 패턴(설계, 실행, 검증, 발견, 창조 등)을 정규화한 것이다.

PG 기반 의존성

PGF는 PG(PPR/Gantree Notation)를 기반 언어로 사용한다. PG의 핵심 속성(Parser-Free, Co-evolutionary, DL/OCME, AI_ 함수, → 파이프라인, [parallel], Gantree 노드 문법)은 PG 스킬에 정의되어 있으며, PGF는 이를 상속한다.

PG 표기법 참조: PG 스킬을 로드하여 Gantree 노드 문법, PPR 구문(AI_/AI_make_ 접두사, → 파이프라인, [parallel], acceptance_criteria, Convergence Loop, Failure Strategy), 데이터 타입, 원자 노드 판단 기준을 확인할 것.

PGF가 PG 위에 추가하는 것:

  • 실행 모드 — design, plan, execute, full-cycle, loop, discover, create, micro, delegate
  • WORKPLAN + POLICY — 실행 계획과 정책 블록
  • status JSON — 노드별 실행 상태 추적
  • Phase transition — 모드 간 자동 전환 조건
  • Session Learning — 세션 간 학습과 전략 적응
  • Epigenetic PPR — 컨텍스트 적응 실행, extract-ppr.py 자동 통합
  • Runtime Continuation — hook/heartbeat/manual 등 런타임별 adapter 기반 장기 실행 보호
  • Design Review — 구현 전 3관점 사전 검증

Current Project PGF State

To check the current PGF state, scan the project's .pgf/ directory:

  • List *.md and *.json files in .pgf/
  • Read status-*.json for execution progress (summary.done / summary.total)
  • Check .pgf/runtime/pgf-loop-state.json for active pgf-loop status. Runtime adapters may mirror this state elsewhere, but .pgf/runtime/ is canonical.

PGF Notation Extensions

PG defines the canonical Gantree node syntax and 6 base status codes (done, in-progress, designing, blocked, decomposed, needs-verify). PGF adds 3 delegation status codes used in delegate mode and AI-to-AI handoffs:

StatusMeaningExecution Rule
(delegated)Handed off to another agentSkip — executing remotely
(awaiting-return)Delegation sent, result pendingPoll or wait for callback
(returned)Result received, integration pendingValidate + integrate result

State transition: (designing) → (delegated) → (awaiting-return) → (returned) → (done) (or (blocked) on validation failure).

All other notation rules (5-level depth, [parallel], @dep:, PPR def blocks, Convergence Loop, Failure Strategy, atomicity 15-minute rule) follow PG skill verbatim.


Reference Document Guide

Path convention: {SKILL_DIR} is a runtime-neutral placeholder denoting this skill's root directory (the directory containing SKILL.md). Every agent runtime (Claude Code, Kimi, Gemini, MCP, Agent SDK, etc.) substitutes it with the local path where the pgf skill is installed. Use {SKILL_DIR}/... for all internal references — never hard-code absolute paths or runtime-specific env vars.

Reference documents for this skill are located in the {SKILL_DIR} directory. Load the appropriate file with the Read tool depending on the execution mode and need.

Base Notation (PG 스킬)

PG 표기법의 핵심 문법은 PG 스킬에 정의되어 있다. PGF 실행 시 PG 스킬이 자동 로드된다.

SourceContent
PG skill (PG/SKILL.md)Gantree 노드 문법, status codes, PPR 구문 (AI_/AI_make_, →, [parallel]), 데이터 타입, 원자 노드 판단, Convergence Loop, Failure Strategy, 체크리스트

PG 스킬에 정의된 내용은 PGF의 모든 레퍼런스 문서에서 재정의하지 않는다. 중복 발견 시 PG 스킬이 정본(canonical source)이다.

Always Reference

DocumentPurpose
{SKILL_DIR}/reference/pgf-format.mdPGF file format (DESIGN/WORKPLAN .md structure, naming conventions)

Execution Discipline & Playbooks (실행 규율 — 본질 활용)

모드가 무엇을 하는지는 아래 Phase별 reference가, 어떻게 실수 없이 수행하는가는 이 3종이 준다.

DocumentPurpose
{SKILL_DIR}/reference/execution-discipline.md실수 없이 끝내는 실행 규율 — 분해→영속(.pgf)→배치 게이트→status 재개, 증거기반 verify(GATE-EVIDENCE), 3관점, 결정론 경계
{SKILL_DIR}/reference/large-work-playbook.md대규모(>30노드)·다파일 작업 — pgxf 인덱스 + 배치 마이그레이션 + 원자적 안전 치환(줄바꿈/개선분/상호참조 보존)
{SKILL_DIR}/reference/integration-doctrine.md통합/융합 판정 — select-or-integrate, fuse vs federate, idea-layer 메타 폐루프(닫혔으나 안 좁아지는 나선)

Design Phase (design mode)

Gantree 노드 문법, PPR 구문(AI_/→/[parallel] 등), 데이터 타입, Convergence Loop, Failure Strategy, 원자 노드 판단(15분 룰), 기본 체크리스트는 **PG 스킬(canonical)**을 참조. PGF가 추가하는 표기/검사 항목은 아래 "PGF Notation Extensions"와 "PGF Execution Checklist" 섹션을 참조.

DocumentPurpose
{SKILL_DIR}/reference/analyze-reference.mddesign --analyze reverse engineering — codebase → auto-generate DESIGN
{SKILL_DIR}/reference/design-review-reference.md3-perspective design review — feasibility/risk/architecture pre-implementation validation

Execution Phase (plan / execute / loop mode)

DocumentPurpose
{SKILL_DIR}/reference/workplan-reference.mdWORKPLAN conversion, POLICY block, Loop algorithm, error recovery
{SKILL_DIR}/loop/loop-reference.mdRuntime-adapter loop engine — node selection, prompt composition, error recovery
{SKILL_DIR}/reference/verify-reference.md3-perspective cross-verification — acceptance/quality/architecture, rework rules
{SKILL_DIR}/reference/cycle-reference.mdfull-cycle + create unified spec — DESIGN→PLAN→EXECUTE→VERIFY pipeline, optional DISCOVER prepend, rework regression, session resumption
{SKILL_DIR}/reference/review-reference.mdreview mode — iterative analysis, prioritization, fix, re-verification
{SKILL_DIR}/reference/evolve-reference.mdevolve mode — self-evolution cycle, capability audit, stabilization detection

Discovery/Creation Phase (discover / create mode)

DocumentPurpose
{SKILL_DIR}/discovery/discovery-reference.mdIdeaFirst 7-stage pipeline, Agent parallel execution, result integration
{SKILL_DIR}/discovery/archive-discovery.pyDiscovery artifact date-based archive script

create mode (5-phase autonomous: DISCOVER + DESIGN→VERIFY) and full-cycle mode (4-phase) share the same pipeline spec — see reference/cycle-reference.md in the Execution Phase table above.

Agent Communication & Delegation

DocumentPurpose
{SKILL_DIR}/reference/agent-protocol.mdPG 기반 에이전트 간 소통 규격 — TaskSpec 형식, 병렬 파견, 결과 통합
{SKILL_DIR}/reference/delegate-reference.mdDELEGATE 모드 — AI-to-AI 핸드오프, authority bounds, delegation chain
{SKILL_DIR}/reference/micro-reference.mdMICRO 모드 — ≤10 노드 제로 오버헤드 실행, 자동 승격
{SKILL_DIR}/reference/session-learning-reference.mdSession Learning — 세션 간 학습, 패턴 누적, 전략 적응

Advanced Reference (as needed)

Future protocols (vision, no current implementation): PGF-MCP (typed intent execution over MCP), PGF-A2A (typed subtree handoff between agents). Use the existing execution modes and agent-protocol.md TaskSpec for current AI-to-AI communication needs.

Persona Agents (discover/create mode)

Discovery Engine's 14 personas are independently defined as agent files in {SKILL_DIR}/agents/:

AgentCognitive StyleDomainHorizon
pgf-persona-p1.md — Disruptive Engineercreativetechnologylong
pgf-persona-p2.md — Cold-eyed Investoranalyticalmarketshort
pgf-persona-p3.md — Regulatory Architectcriticalpolicylong
pgf-persona-p4.md — Connecting Scientistintuitivesciencelong
pgf-persona-p5.md — Field Operatoranalyticaltechnologyshort
pgf-persona-p6.md — Future Sociologistintuitivesocietylong
pgf-persona-p7.md — Contrarian Criticcriticalmarketshort
pgf-persona-p8.md — Convergence Architectcreativescience_technologylong
pgf-persona-p9.md — Practical Agency Ethicistcriticalethicslong
pgf-persona-p10.md — Embodied UX Anthropologistintuitivehuman_experienceshort
pgf-persona-p11.md — Adversarial Robustness Analystcriticalsecurityshort
pgf-persona-p12.md — Regenerative Systems Ecologistintuitiveecologylong
pgf-persona-p13.md — Historical Cycle Analystanalyticalhistorylong
pgf-persona-p14.md — Mechanism Designercreativeeconomicslong

Execution Modes

PGF supports the following execution modes via $ARGUMENTS.

Invocation examples: /PGF design MyProject, /PGF full-cycle ChatApp, /PGF loop start, /PGF discover, /PGF create

ModeTriggerAction
design"설계해줘", "구조 설계"Gantree structure design + PPR detailing → generate DESIGN-{Name}.md
design --analyze"분석해줘", "구조 분석"(design의 하위 옵션) Reverse-engineer existing system into PGF → read code → extract Gantree + PPR
plan"작업 계획", "WORKPLAN"DESIGN → WORKPLAN conversion + POLICY configuration
execute"실행해줘", "구현해줘"Sequential node execution based on WORKPLAN
full-cycle"전체 진행", "풀사이클"Full process: design → plan → execute → verify. Opt-in 게이트: --with-review[=N] 플래그로 design 직후 review 삽입 (max N회 revise, 기본 N=1)
loop"루프", "자동실행"Automatic or guided node traversal/execution via runtime-adapter WORKPLAN
discover"발견해줘", "아이디어"IdeaFirst 7-stage × 14 personas → idea discovery
create"창조해", "자율 창조"Full autonomous execution: discover → design → plan → execute → verify
micro"간단히", "빠르게"Zero-overhead execution for ≤10 nodes — bypass WORKPLAN
review"검토해", "리뷰해"Iterative review & improvement — 기존 산출물 면밀 검토·수정·재검증 반복
evolve"진화해", "자기개선"Self-evolution cycle — 능력 gap 발견·설계·구현·검증·기록 반복
delegate"위임해", "맡겨"AI-to-AI task handoff with PG TaskSpec, authority bounds, delegation chain

$ARGUMENTS parsing rules:

  • $ARGUMENTS[0]: mode keyword
  • $ARGUMENTS[1:]: project name or target description
  • No mode keyword → infer from context (e.g., presence of files in .pgf/ directory)
  • Project name only → defaults to design mode

File Path Rules

<project-root>/
    .pgf/
        DESIGN-{Name}.md          # System design (Gantree + PPR)
        WORKPLAN-{Name}.md        # Executable work plan
        status-{Name}.json        # Execution state tracking

{Name} = CamelCase project/task name. Multiple tasks can coexist in the same .pgf/.

Progress Reporting

[PGF] ✓ NodeName (done) | 3/12 nodes done | next: NextNode
[PGF] ✗ NodeName (blocked) | blocker: reason | skip → NextNode

Integrated Execution Process

아래 Step들은 순차 프로세스가 아닌 독립 모드다. 사용자 지시나 PGF 모드에 따라 필요한 것만 실행한다. full-cycle/create 모드만이 여러 Step을 순차 연결한다.

Step 1: design — Gantree Structure Design

Top-Down BFS hierarchical decomposition → down to atomic nodes. Reference: PG skill (Gantree/PPR canonical) + this SKILL.md "PGF Notation Extensions" section for PGF-specific status codes.

Completion criteria: (1) All leaves = atomic nodes (2) PPR def written for complex nodes (3) No circular @dep (4) Checklist passed

Step 2: plan — WORKPLAN Generation

DESIGN-{Name}.md → WORKPLAN-{Name}.md conversion. Reference: workplan-reference.md §2

Step 3: execute — Sequential Node Execution

Node execution based on WORKPLAN-{Name}.md. For [parallel] nodes, use the current runtime's parallel subagent/worktree capability when available; otherwise execute sequentially while preserving dependency order. Reference: workplan-reference.md §4

Step 4: verify — Cross-Verification

Details: {SKILL_DIR}/reference/verify-reference.md

3-perspective verification:

  1. Acceptance Criteria — Re-check acceptance_criteria from DESIGN PPR (Lightweight: # criteria: inline)
  2. Code Quality — runtime review/simplify capability or direct inspection, verifying reuse/quality/efficiency of changed code
  3. Architecture — Compare DESIGN Gantree ↔ actual implementation structure (Lightweight: skip)

Result: passed → complete / rework → rollback target node + re-execute subtree / blocked → report to user. Rework iterations are allowed up to POLICY.max_verify_cycles.

full-cycle

Details: {SKILL_DIR}/reference/cycle-reference.md (covers both full-cycle and create modes)

Automatically execute design → plan → execute → verify as one continuous process. On rework during verify, roll back only the affected subtree and re-execute (up to POLICY.max_verify_cycles times). On session interruption, resume from the last Phase recorded in WORKPLAN/status JSON.

Phase transition conditions:

TransitionConditionOn failure
discover → designauto_select_idea() succeeds (create mode only)0 votes → abort
design → planAll 4 completion criteria metcontinue design
plan → executeWORKPLAN + status JSON generatedreport error
execute → verifyAll nodes terminalcontinue execute
verify → completepassedrework or report

Opt-in design review (--with-review[=N])

기본 풀사이클은 변경하지 않는다. 사용자가 명시적으로 --with-review 플래그를 줄 때만 design → plan 사이에 review 게이트를 삽입한다.

Invocation동작
/PGF full-cycle X기본 동작 (review 없음)
/PGF full-cycle X --with-reviewreview 1회 삽입 (N=1 기본)
/PGF full-cycle X --with-review=3최대 3회 review-revise 반복
/PGF create X --with-review=2create 모드도 동일 플래그 적용

review 게이트 동작 (reference/design-review-reference.md 참조):

  1. design 완료 직후 다관점 SubAgent 검토 실행 (PG/PGF 표기법, 보안, 프로토콜, 아키텍처)
  2. 결과 분류: Critical=0, High≤2 → plan 진행. 그 외 → DESIGN revise 후 재검토
  3. revise 횟수 ≤ N. N회 초과 시 잔여 이슈 보고 + 사용자 승인 시 plan 진행 (강제 차단 아님)
  4. status JSON에 review_iterations, unresolved_issues 만 추가 — 기존 키 불변

Skip rules (Level 1/Micro에 강제 적용 시 과잉이므로 자동 스킵):

  • Level 1 (≤3 노드) → 플래그 무시, review 스킵
  • micro 모드 → 플래그 무시
  • Level 2 이상 → 플래그 적용

Step 5: loop — Runtime-Adapter Auto-Execution

Details: {SKILL_DIR}/loop/loop-reference.md

CommandAction
/PGF loop startInitialize loop + execute first node
/PGF loop cancelCancel active loop
/PGF loop statusReport progress status

On /PGF loop start or natural-language equivalent: (1) Verify WORKPLAN exists (2) initialize .pgf/runtime/pgf-loop-state.json (3) Determine mode (DESIGN exists → Standard / absent → Lightweight) (4) Select first node + load execution spec (5) Begin implementation. Afterwards, a runtime adapter continues the next node automatically when supported, or emits the next-node prompt for manual/agent continuation.

Lightweight mode: Loop execution with WORKPLAN only, without DESIGN. # inline comments under WORKPLAN nodes serve as PPR substitutes. Suitable for simple tasks, documentation, refactoring, etc.

Step 6: discover — IdeaFirst Persona Multi-Agent Discovery

Details: {SKILL_DIR}/discovery/discovery-reference.md

CommandAction
/PGF discoverExecute all 7 stages
/PGF discover --from-step NRestart from stage N
/PGF discover --personas NUse N personas

Invoke 14 {SKILL_DIR}/agents/pgf-persona-p*.md personas in parallel when the runtime supports subagents. If not, simulate personas sequentially in the current runtime. Model hints inside persona files are advisory only. Integrate results from each stage → save to .pgf/discovery/{step}.md. HAO principle: do not enforce output format, preserve originals unedited.

Step 7: create — Autonomous Creation Cycle

Details: {SKILL_DIR}/reference/cycle-reference.md (unified spec — create is the 5-phase autonomous variant)

CommandAction
/PGF create5-Phase autonomous execution (DISCOVER→DESIGN→PLAN→EXECUTE→VERIFY)
/PGF create --skip-discoverStart from design using existing final_idea.md

Fully autonomous execution without user approval. STEP 7 is replaced by auto_select_idea (vote-based automatic selection).

Step 8: micro — Zero-Overhead Small Task Execution

Details: {SKILL_DIR}/reference/micro-reference.md

CommandAction
/PGF micro "task description"Inline decomposition → serial execution → minimal verify

Entry: nodes ≤ 10, depth ≤ 3, no external deps, ≤ 30 min. Bypasses WORKPLAN/POLICY/status JSON. In-memory status only. Auto-promotes to full WORKPLAN if bounds exceeded.

Step 9: delegate — AI-to-AI Task Handoff

Details: {SKILL_DIR}/reference/delegate-reference.md

Auto-triggered during execute when should_delegate() → True (capability gap, load balancing, parallel opportunity). Packages context into PG TaskSpec with AuthorityBounds → handshake → await result → validate → merge. Delegation chain tracks depth (max 3) and prevents cycles.

Session Learning (횡단 — 모든 모드)

Details: {SKILL_DIR}/reference/session-learning-reference.md

  • Session start: Load .pgf/patterns/ → adapt POLICY defaults
  • Session end: Record SessionOutcome to .pgf/sessions/{id}.outcome.json
  • Every 10 sessions: Re-accumulate patterns (successful strategies, common blockers)

Scale Detection and Strategy

PG는 3-Level(Level 1~3)을 정의한다. PGF는 이를 상속하고 Large/Multi-agent를 추가한다.

ScaleCriteriaStrategy
Level 1nodes ≤ 3자연어 인라인 실행 — PG 파일 없음
Level 2nodes 4–10Gantree + # 주석 — 선택적 파일
Level 3nodes 11–30Full DESIGN + WORKPLAN + status JSON
Largenodes > 30 or (decomposed)Module separation + runtime-supported context compaction/checkpointing
Multi-agent[parallel] with specialized tasksdelegate mode — AI-to-AI handoff

Progressive Formalization: Level 판단은 자동. 자연어 입력 → AI가 복잡도 평가 → 적합한 Level 선택. 실행 중 승격 시 기존 상태 보존.

Execution Rules

  1. Parse Gantree → determine hierarchy via indentation
  2. Status codes → decide execute/skip
  3. @dep: → determine execution order
  4. [parallel] → concurrent processing
  5. PPR def present → interpret and execute / AI_ inline → execute directly / no PPR → recurse into children
  6. Atomicity judgment → 15-minute rule
  7. Failure → Failure Strategy + AI Redesign Authority
  8. Agent dispatch → PG TaskSpec — 에이전트 파견 시 자연어 대신 agent-protocol.md의 PG TaskSpec 형식 사용. 입출력 타입, acceptance_criteria, failure_strategy를 구조화하여 전달
  9. Session start → load patterns — .pgf/patterns/에서 과거 패턴 로드 → POLICY 자동 적응
  10. Session end → record outcome — .pgf/sessions/{id}.outcome.json에 SessionOutcome 자동 기록

Runtime Integration

CapabilityRuntime-neutral rule
Parallel executionExecute independent nodes within [parallel] blocks using available subagents, workers, worktrees, or sequential fallback
Code quality reviewDuring verify, run the runtime's review/simplification tool if available; otherwise perform direct code review against acceptance criteria
Context compaction/checkpointingFor long runs, preserve WORKPLAN path, status JSON, and .pgf/runtime/pgf-loop-state.json before compaction or handoff

PGF Execution Checklist

기본 Gantree/PPR 작성 체크리스트는 PG 스킬 참조. 아래는 PGF 실행 단계 고유 항목.

Execution Phase

  • WORKPLAN-{Name}.md의 모든 노드 status가 terminal(done/blocked)인가
  • status-{Name}.json의 summary가 WORKPLAN과 일치하는가
  • (blocked) 노드에 blocker 사유가 기록되었는가

Verify Phase (3-Perspective)

  • Acceptance: 완료된 각 노드의 acceptance_criteria 재검증 (Lightweight: # criteria: 인라인)
  • Code Quality: 변경된 코드를 런타임의 review/simplify 도구 또는 직접 검토로 재사용/품질/효율성 검증
  • Architecture: DESIGN Gantree ↔ 실제 구현 구조 비교 (Lightweight: skip)
  • Verdict 기록: passed / rework / blocked
  • Rework 시: 대상 노드 + 자식 롤백 → 재실행 → 재검증 (max_verify_cycles 이내)
  • Blocked 시: 사유 문서화 + 사용자 보고

full-cycle Mode

  • design → plan 전이 전 4가지 완료 기준 충족
  • plan → execute 전이 시 WORKPLAN + status JSON 존재 확인
  • execute → verify 전이 시 모든 노드 terminal 확인
  • Verify rework 시 대상 서브트리만 롤백 (전체 reset 금지)
  • max_verify_cycles 초과 시 산출물 보존 + abort 보고
  • 세션 중단 시 WORKPLAN/status JSON에서 재개 가능 확인

Discovery Archive

  • 실행 완료 후 archive-discovery 스크립트 실행
  • 아카이브 디렉토리가 날짜(YYYY-MM-DD) 단위로 분리되었는가
  • create 모드: Phase 1 완료 직후 자동 아카이브

Delegation & Micro Extensions

  • AI_make_ 사역 패턴이 필요한 곳에 사용되었는가
  • ≤10 노드 작업에 micro 모드 사용을 검토했는가
  • 병렬 에이전트 파견 시 PG TaskSpec 형식을 사용했는가
  • delegate 시 AuthorityBounds(can_create/can_modify/forbidden)를 명시했는가
  • Delegation chain depth ≤ 3 확인했는가
  • 세션 완료 시 SessionOutcome을 기록했는가
  • (delegated)/(awaiting-return)/(returned) status를 적절히 사용했는가

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.