agentleFS
sabirmgdsabirmgd/terminal-first-goal-loop/skills/status-report/SKILL.md

status-report

Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Build daily, weekly, or monthly status reports from evidence across git, tickets, docs, meetings, email, and calendars, with visible source failures and no invented activity.

16 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use postmortem and meeting-notes.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Hongyu-yuSkill

    postmortem

    Use when analyzing failures, outages, incidents, or negative outcomes, conducting blameless postmortems, documenting root causes with 5 Whys or fishbone diagrams, identifying corrective actions with owners and timelines, learning from near-misses, establishing prevention strategies, or when user mentions postmortem, incident review, failure analysis, RCA, lessons learned, or after-action review.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • claude-office-skillsSkill

    meeting-notes

    >

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this when a progress report should be grounded in what actually happened.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Use only the sources that matter to the requested report.

    line 22
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not mix older work into the current report because it sounds relevant.

    line 33
  4. Distinctive:

    If the user wants a specific format, keep this evidence model underneath it.

    line 61
  5. Distinctive:

    Never invent work that has no source.

    line 65
  6. Distinctive:

    Keep source failures visible.

    line 67
  7. Distinctive:

    If a period was quiet, say it was quiet.

    line 69

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Status Report

Use this when a progress report should be grounded in what actually happened.

Sources

Possible sources:

  • git history and diffs
  • pull requests or merge requests
  • tickets and ticket comments
  • docs or wiki updates
  • meeting notes or transcripts
  • email
  • calendar

Use only the sources that matter to the requested report.

Time window

Resolve the exact reporting window first:

  • daily
  • weekly
  • monthly
  • custom range

Do not mix older work into the current report because it sounds relevant.

Build from evidence

For each claimed item, keep at least one real source.

Good report items:

  • merged PR with link
  • ticket moved with status proof
  • page published with version proof
  • meeting decision with transcript or notes source
  • deployment or verification with concrete evidence

Output shape

Return:

Window:
Sources checked:
Completed work:
In progress:
Blocked:
Follow-ups:
Source failures:

If the user wants a specific format, keep this evidence model underneath it.

Rules

  1. Never invent work that has no source.
  2. Deduplicate the same activity across git, tickets, and docs.
  3. Keep source failures visible. Missing Jira or email access should not become silent omissions.
  4. Separate completed work from discussion, planning, or open investigation.
  5. If a period was quiet, say it was quiet.

Stop rules

Stop when:

  • the report is grounded and complete for the requested window
  • a missing source leaves a visible gap that cannot be closed safely

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.