hot-reload
Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Drive debugging and feature completion through the smallest failing boundary first, reuse valid evidence, and keep the full journey as the last step. Use when repeated rebuilds, redeploys, or end-to-end reruns are slowing the task down.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- access-checkSkill
- babysit-prsSkill
- browser-proofSkill
- bugfixSkill
- bug-reproSkill
- cleanupSkill
- contextSkill
- dev-flowSkill
- docs-managerSkill
- jira-managerSkill
- polishSkill
- pr-managerSkill
- release-proofSkill
- status-reportSkill
- sync-projectSkill
- watch-loopSkill
- whatsapp-meSkill
- workflowSkill
- worktreeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
Keep the full browser, end-to-end, or release journey for last.
- Distinctive: line 23
If the same defect class comes back twice, stop local patching and escalate to a deeper design or invariant review.
- Distinctive: line 40
When a change touches only one boundary, do not throw away unrelated green proof.
- Distinctive: line 41
Only invalidate evidence that the change can actually affect.
- Distinctive: line 52
Stop this loop and switch to a wider review when:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Hot Reload
This skill changes the order of proof, not the definition of done.
The Loop
Repeat this loop until the boundary is green:
exact failure -> smallest failing check -> smallest coherent fix -> same check again -> next boundary
Rules
- Freeze the exact failing boundary before editing.
- Pick the cheapest check that can prove the current claim.
- Reuse accepted evidence unless the change actually invalidates it.
- Move up one boundary at a time.
- Keep the full browser, end-to-end, or release journey for last.
- If the same defect class comes back twice, stop local patching and escalate to a deeper design or invariant review.
Boundary Ladder
Typical order:
- static check or type check
- unit test
- integration or contract test
- hot-reload request
- slot or sandbox proof
- full browser or consumer journey
- release or deployed-runtime proof
Evidence Reuse
When a change touches only one boundary, do not throw away unrelated green proof. Only invalidate evidence that the change can actually affect.
A useful record after each step is:
- what failed
- what changed
- what proof stayed valid
- what proof must be rerun next
Stop Conditions
Stop this loop and switch to a wider review when:
- the same root defect recurs twice
- the next fix would cross a larger architectural boundary
- the environment is the real blocker rather than the code
- the task now needs the final browser or release proof
Output Contract
HOT RELOAD | boundary=<summary> | level=<name>
FAILURE | <exact failing signal>
DELTA | <what changed>
REUSED | <still-valid proof>
NEXT | <smallest next check>
FULL JOURNEY | allowed|not-yetDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

