writing-plans
Skill1 starsChanged 21 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when a clear task needs a multi-step implementation plan, dependency ordering, or a durable handoff. Skip for routine changes that can be executed directly.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 172 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Read the relevant code and repository instructions before naming files or commands.
- Distinctive: line 17
When planning extraction or migration of repeated operations, read selective shared-code refactoring.
- Distinctive: line 31
Before execution, check scope coverage, dependencies, failure paths, and final acceptance.
- Distinctive: line 32
Update the plan when evidence or user requirements change.
- Distinctive: line 35
Do not ask the user to choose an execution mechanism unless it changes a meaningful cost, constraint, or outcome.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 172 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Plan implementation
Turn the accepted goal into an executable sequence. Resolve material missing requirements first; do not reopen choices the user already made. A request for a plan ends with a plan. A request to implement continues into authorized work once the plan is ready.
Read the relevant code and repository instructions before naming files or commands. Use an exposed planning tool if available; otherwise keep a short Markdown checklist. Save a plan in the repository's preferred location when the user requests a document, a handoff needs one, or the work must survive a context reset. Otherwise keep planning lightweight.
When planning extraction or migration of repeated operations, read selective shared-code refactoring.
Each step identifies:
- The observable outcome and affected files or interfaces.
- Prerequisites and unresolved decisions that could change the approach.
- A check that establishes completion at the claimed layer.
Order by dependencies and deliver a thin working path (a walking skeleton) early. Make steps small enough to verify independently. Distinguish local step checks from final integration acceptance. Include code or exact commands where they remove ambiguity, not a second implementation of the entire solution. Discover verifiable facts instead of filling the plan with placeholders.
Before execution, check scope coverage, dependencies, failure paths, and final acceptance. Update the plan when evidence or user requirements change; preserve the reason for material changes. Record blocked checks without marking them complete. Continue independent work.
Do not ask the user to choose an execution mechanism unless it changes a meaningful cost, constraint, or outcome. Planning alone does not authorize delegation, package installation, commit, push, merge, deployment, or a new sidebar task. Follow current authorization for those actions. At handoff, include the workspace, current state, next action, and remaining checks so another agent can continue without this conversation.
Other versions191 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 4
- ryanportfolio/Corewise.Academy★ 1100% same
- ryanportfolio/savetokens★ 1100% same
- ryanportfolio/STK★ 1100% same
- ryanportfolio/HarnessFirmware.com★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 187
- obra/superpowers★ 305ksame name
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.4ksame name
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6ksame name
- microsoft/FluidFramework★ 5ksame name
- revokslab/ShipFree★ 1.7ksame name
- GanyuanRan/Aegis★ 1.4ksame name
- pcvelz/superpowers★ 1.3ksame name
- math-inc/OpenGauss★ 1.3ksame name
- coco-research/coco★ 797same name
177 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 2 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GEd520Skillchinese-code-review
中文 review 沟通参考——话术模板、分级标注(必须修复/建议修改/仅供参考)、国内团队常见反模式应对。仅在用户显式 /chinese-code-review 时调用,不要根据上下文自动触发。
Also in 7 projects that use this
GEd520Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 commit 与 changelog 配置参考——Conventional Commits 中文适配、commitlint/husky/commitizen 中文模板、conventional-changelog 中文配置。仅在用户显式 /chinese-commit-conventions 时调用,不要根据上下文自动触发。
Also in 7 projects that use this
- +2 more from GEd520
In this repository85 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- addskillSkill
- adopt-repoSkill
- advocateSkill
- apply-firmwareSkill
- arenaSkill
- astra-reviewSkill
- babysit-ciSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- broSkill
- cache-loopSkill
- cavemanSkill
- claude-reviewSkill
- codex-reviewSkill
- dareSkill
- deep-planSkill
- design-prototypesSkill
- enhance-promptSkill
- external-reviewSkill
- fable-modeSkill
- forge-repo-ui-skillSkill
- handoff-auditSkill
- impartial-reviewSkill
- init-projectSkill
- labSkill
- long-horizonSkill
- optimize-contextSkill
- opus-fullreviewSkill
- perf-loopSkill
- recallSkill
- redesign-conceptsSkill
- refineSkill
- serversSkill
- session-hubSkill
- showpieceSkill
- sync-starterSkill
- whySkill
- wow-loopSkill
- wrapupSkill
- writingSkill
- addskillSkill
- adopt-repoSkill
- advocateSkill
- apply-firmwareSkill
- arenaSkill
- astra-fullreviewSkill
- astra-reviewSkill
- babysit-ciSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- broSkill
- cache-loopSkill
- cavemanSkill
- claude-reviewSkill
- codex-fullreviewSkill
- codex-image-genSkill
- codex-reviewSkill
- coordinateSkill
- dareSkill
- deep-planSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

