deming-pdsa
Skill1 starsChanged 50 days agoMITView on GitHub
Run Deming Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA/PDCA) cycles with explicit hypotheses, measurable gates, proof probes, and standard-work updates. Use when driving execution under uncertainty, recovering stalled build lanes, coordinating parallel agents, or reducing repeat failures.
In this repository113 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ac-ideateSkill
- ac-listSkill
- ac-roadmapSkill
- agentbridge-mcpSkill
- almanacSkill
- almquist-shellSkill
- ansible-fleetSkill
- apfsSkill
- apple-siliconSkill
- arena-actorsSkill
- asustor-nasSkill
- a-teamSkill
- atem-miniSkill
- at-tuiSkill
- autoresearchSkill
- babysitSkill
- bonzibuddySkill
- bop-brainstormSkill
- bop-catalogSkill
- bop-onSkill
- bop-teamSkill
- bop-workflowSkill
- bsd-portabilitySkill
- code-refactoringSkill
- codex-personasSkill
- context-graphSkill
- councilSkill
- datadog-backupSkill
- dd-tagsSkill
- delegateSkill
- deterministic-replaySkill
- dispatch-nuSkill
- durable-commitSkill
- elixir-gastown-opsSkill
- ergo-ircSkill
- esp32-tang-bridgeSkill
- fleet-evalSkill
- fleet-ircSkill
- freebsd-build-vmSkill
- freebsd-piSkill
- freebsdSkill
- ganttSkill
- gastown-opsSkill
- gastown-slingSkill
- gh-authSkill
- gitea-releaseSkill
- gitea-runnerSkill
- henshuSkill
- irclaw-cluster-opsSkill
- irclaw-research-teamSkill
- irc-taskSkill
- jail-factorySkill
- jjSkill
- jobcard-systemSkill
- kubernetesSkill
- leptosSkill
- loreSkill
- lower-bound-reviewSkill
- macvlan-netSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Use this skill when the user asks for PDSA, PDCA, Deming, continuous improvement, stop-line, andon, standard work, or when work is looping …
- Distinctive: line 12
Create a cycle artifact:
- Very specific: line 15
Run one controlled DO experiment (single variable change).
- Very specific: line 16
Run STUDY with proof probes (proveryay verify ...
- Distinctive: line 21
Every cycle must include these fields:
- Distinctive: line 34
If any field is missing, the cycle is incomplete.
- Distinctive: line 43
Write claims in machine-verifiable form.
- Very specific: line 60
Verify claims with proveryay.
- Distinctive: line 64
No verbal completion without probe evidence.
- Distinctive: line 80
Use this exact shape in cycle files and agent reports:
- Distinctive: line 95
Stop execution immediately when any condition is true:
- Distinctive: line 104
do not retry blindly
- Distinctive: line 112
treat unverified claims as non-facts
- Distinctive: line 124
Keep it concise and numeric.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Deming PDSA
Use this skill when the user asks for PDSA, PDCA, Deming, continuous improvement, stop-line, andon, standard work, or when work is looping without measurable progress.
Quick Start
- Create a cycle artifact:
nu scripts/new-pdsa-cycle.nu --title "<problem>" --owner "<owner>"
- Fill in
PLANfirst; do not execute before gates are defined. - Run one controlled
DOexperiment (single variable change). - Run
STUDYwith proof probes (proveryay verify ...orproveryay batch). - Complete
ACT: adopt/adapt/abandon and update standard work.
PDSA Contract
Every cycle must include these fields:
problem_statement: concrete defect or bottleneckhypothesis: what change should improve and whyprimary_metric: one numeric metrictarget: numeric target and deadlineguardrails: max acceptable regressionsowner: single accountable ownertimebox: explicit start/end windowclaims: verifiable assertions with shell probesdecision:ADOPT,ADAPT, orABANDONstandard_work_update: exact procedure change
If any field is missing, the cycle is incomplete.
Workflow
PLAN
- Define baseline from observed facts (not assumptions).
- Pick the smallest experiment that can falsify the hypothesis.
- Define stop-line triggers before execution.
- Write claims in machine-verifiable form.
Output:
plans/pdsa/<cycle-id>.md(plan section complete)
DO
- Execute exactly the planned experiment.
- Keep one-change-at-a-time discipline.
- Record command, timestamp, and output artifact locations.
Output:
- command logs, build logs, artifact paths
STUDY
- Compare baseline vs result for primary metric.
- Verify claims with
proveryay. - Mark each claim
PASS,FAIL, orINCONCLUSIVE.
Required rule:
- No verbal completion without probe evidence.
Output:
study_summaryin cycle file with metric delta and proof snippets
ACT
ADOPT: target met and guardrails holdADAPT: partial progress, adjust one variableABANDON: no gain or guardrail breach
Then update standard work:
- append one concrete change to
plans/pdsa/STANDARD-WORK.md
Claim Format
Use this exact shape in cycle files and agent reports:
<claims>
- claim: "L1 build is actively compiling"
probe: "ssh studio@10.0.2.42 'wc -c /home/studio/bsd-build/logs/buildworld-l1.log'"
expect: ""
- claim: "Artifact is bootable in QEMU"
probe: "grep -E 'Booting|login:' /path/to/boot.log"
expect: "Booting"
</claims>Stop-Line Rules
Stop execution immediately when any condition is true:
- repeated identical failure signature appears twice in window
- disk guardrail breached
- host unreachable for required lane
- proof probes fail for critical claim
On stop-line:
- open a new PDSA cycle with root-cause hypothesis
- do not retry blindly
Multi-Agent Use
When using subagents:
- assign each agent one lane or one proof surface
- require
<claims>block in every agent completion - treat unverified claims as non-facts
- merge only after at least one independent verifier agent passes
Output Standard
Return results in this order:
PLANsummary (hypothesis, metric, target)DOactions (commands + artifacts)STUDYevidence (probe verdicts)ACTdecision and standard-work update
Keep it concise and numeric.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

