agentleFS
ryanmacleanryanmaclean/skills/a-team/SKILL.md

a-team

Skill1 starsChanged 50 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when a project needs role-based team coordination — PM breakdown, parallel specialist execution, review gates. Best for multi-deliverable projects vs tiger-team (single problem) or zellij-team (independent tasks).

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    All agents run with --dangerously-skip-permissions --permission-mode bypassPermissions by default.

    line 83
  2. Distinctive:

    Every agent dispatched through this skill receives the following appended to its prompt automatically:

    line 97
  3. Very specific:

    If the agent's work is purely planning / research / narrative (no state changes), the agent may omit the <claims> block.

    line 107

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

A-Team — Role-Based Project Team Coordination

Overview

Inspired by a.team: don't send solo agents — form a project team with specific roles. A PM coordinates, engineers execute, specialists advise, reviewers gate quality. The team has continuity across the project lifecycle.

Roles

RoleAgentPurpose
pmProject ManagerReads brief, breaks into tasks, assigns to specialists, synthesizes final output
engineerImplementationWrites code, runs commands, produces artifacts
reviewerQuality GateChecks engineer + specialist output, flags issues before PM synthesis
specialistDomain ExpertConfigurable domain: "security", "ansible", "elixir", "performance", etc.

Coordination Flow

Phase 1: PM Breakdown
  ┌─────────┐
  │   PM    │  reads brief → task list + role assignments
  └────┬────┘
       │
Phase 2: Parallel Execution
  ┌────┴────┬────────────┐
  │ Engineer │ Specialist │  work assigned tasks in parallel
  └────┬────┴─────┬──────┘
       │          │
Phase 3: Review Gate
  ┌────┴──────────┴──┐
  │     Reviewer     │  checks all output, flags issues
  └────────┬─────────┘
           │
Phase 4: PM Synthesis
  ┌────────┴─────────┐
  │   PM (final)     │  integrates, writes summary/ship report
  └──────────────────┘

Each phase runs explicitly via --phase 1|2|3|4 so you see output between phases.

Quick Start

# Phase 1: PM breaks down the project
nu ~/.claude/skills/a-team/a-team.nu --phase 1 \
  --brief "Deploy gastown rate limiter to Pi fleet"

# Phase 2: Engineer + Specialist execute in parallel panes
nu ~/.claude/skills/a-team/a-team.nu --phase 2 \
  --brief "Deploy gastown rate limiter to Pi fleet" \
  --specialist "ansible"

# Phase 3: Reviewer checks output
nu ~/.claude/skills/a-team/a-team.nu --phase 3 \
  --brief "Deploy gastown rate limiter to Pi fleet"

# Dry run any phase
nu ~/.claude/skills/a-team/a-team.nu --dry-run --phase 1 \
  --brief "Deploy gastown rate limiter to Pi fleet"

When to Use: a-team vs tiger-team vs zellij-team

a-teamtiger-teamzellij-team
ShapeProject team with rolesSame problem, specialist lensesParallel tasks, generic workers
CoordinationSequential phases + review gatesParallel analysis, synthesizeFire-and-forget parallel
Best forMulti-deliverable projectsDeep investigation of one issueIndependent, parallelizable tasks
PM?Yes — plans, assigns, synthesizesNo — each lens is peerNo — tasks are self-contained
Review gate?Yes — reviewer checks before shipNo — synthesis is the gateNo
Example"Deploy service to fleet: build, distribute, configure, verify""Why is auth latency spiking?""Fix these 5 independent bugs"

Agent Flags

All agents run with --dangerously-skip-permissions --permission-mode bypassPermissions by default. Override with --mode default for interactive permission prompts.

Output Convention

Each phase writes output to /tmp/a-team-<brief-hash>/:

  • phase1-pm-plan.md — PM's task breakdown
  • phase2-engineer.md — Engineer's output
  • phase2-specialist.md — Specialist's output
  • phase3-review.md — Reviewer's findings
  • phase4-summary.md — PM's final synthesis

Verification contract (auto-injected by proveryay)

Every agent dispatched through this skill receives the following appended to its prompt automatically:

<see ~/.claude/skills/proveryay/CLAIMS-TEMPLATE.md — injected verbatim>

This means every agent MUST emit a <claims> block when it makes any deployment/state-change assertion. The proveryay SubagentStop hook will verify each claim in parallel and inject structured verdicts into the dispatcher's next-turn context.

If the agent's work is purely planning / research / narrative (no state changes), the agent may omit the <claims> block. Proveryay treats absence as silent (no noise).

Invocation example with template injection:

# Prompt injection: template auto-appended (idempotent)
let tpl = (open --raw ~/.claude/skills/proveryay/CLAIMS-TEMPLATE.md)
let prompt = if ($prompt | str contains "<claims>") { $prompt } else { $"($prompt)\n\n($tpl)" }

See:

  • ~/.claude/skills/proveryay/SKILL.md — hook behavior
  • ~/.claude/skills/proveryay/CLAIMS-TEMPLATE.md — canonical format
  • ~/.claude/skills/fleet-eval/SKILL.md — probe taxonomy

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.