agentleFS
ryankoleanryankolean/summit-claude-skills/skills/context-summary/SKILL.md

context-summary

Skill3 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Pack the active tasking of the current Claude.ai chat into a clipboard-ready, token-efficient summary for handoff to a fresh Claude.ai session. Captures only what's needed to continue the active work, know the next action, and know when the work is complete — nothing archival, nothing conversational. Activates when the user says "context summary", "context-summary", "pack the context", "pack this context", "fresh context handoff", "context handoff", "summarize this session", "wrap this for a new chat", or any variant. Output is a single fenced markdown block at the end of the response so it can be tap-and-hold copied on mobile.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If there are multiple active threads, pick the most recent one and flag the others under "Other open threads" at the bottom.

    line 31
  2. Very specific:

    Do not invent files, paths, repos, or facts.

    line 43
  3. Distinctive:

    No restating userMemories content

    line 48
  4. Very specific:

    After the block, optionally offer: chain into chat-to-code-prompt if the next action is code execution, or workflow-lock if the session …

    line 58
  5. Distinctive:

    One fenced code block: Always at the end of the response.

    line 97
  6. Distinctive:

    Token-efficient: No filler. If a field is empty, omit it entirely.

    line 99
  7. Distinctive:

    Push back on empty chats: If there's no active tasking worth packing, say so and ask what to summarize — don't generate filler.

    line 105

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

context-summary

Purpose

Let Ryan clear the context window and start a fresh Claude.ai chat without burning tokens rebuilding state. Take the active tasking of the current chat — what's being worked on, what's decided, what's next, how we know we're done — and pack it into a self-contained brief that a fresh Claude instance can pick up cold.

The output is always a single fenced markdown block, ready to paste into a new Claude.ai chat.

Activation

Triggered by any of:

  • "context summary" / "context-summary"
  • "pack the context" / "pack this context"
  • "fresh context handoff" / "context handoff"
  • "summarize this session" / "summarize this session for a fresh context"
  • "wrap this for a new chat" / "wrap this up for fresh context"
  • "clear context — give me the handoff"

Execution

Step 1 — Identify the active tasking

Scan the chat and find the single active thread of work — the thing Ryan is currently trying to move forward. Ignore:

  • Tangents that didn't pan out
  • Background already captured in userMemories (unless actively relevant to the next step)
  • Fully-resolved questions with no downstream impact
  • Conversational filler

If there are multiple active threads, pick the most recent one and flag the others under "Other open threads" at the bottom.

Step 2 — Extract only what the next session needs

For the active tasking, pull:

  • What — 1–3 sentences on what's being worked on and why
  • State — what's done, what's in progress, what's blocked
  • Decisions / constraints — choices already made that affect continuation (stack, approach, scope boundaries)
  • Artifacts produced this session — filenames/paths/refs, not full content (unless small and critical)
  • Next action — the single immediate next step
  • Completion criteria — how we know the active tasking is done
  • After completion — what comes next, or "session complete"

Do not invent files, paths, repos, or facts. Mark unknowns <TBD>.

Step 3 — Strip chat artifacts

  • No "as we discussed", "earlier in this chat", "I mentioned above"
  • No narrative transitions
  • No restating userMemories content
  • Assume the receiving session has zero memory of this chat

Step 4 — Output

Above the code block, write 1–2 lines max:

  • "Paste into a fresh Claude.ai chat to continue"
  • Any flagged assumptions (e.g., "assumed repo: ryankolean/dtst")

Then output the full summary as a single fenced markdown block.

After the block, optionally offer: chain into chat-to-code-prompt if the next action is code execution, or workflow-lock if the session revealed a repeatable pattern worth templating.

Template

# Context Summary — <active tasking title>

**Project:** <Summit / DTST / Rare Find / Healthspan / StockX / Personal / etc.>
**Repo / location:** <if applicable, else omit>

## Active Tasking
<1–3 sentences on what's being worked on and why>

## State
- **Done:** <what's complete>
- **In progress:** <what's partially done>
- **Blocked on:** <blocker, or "nothing">

## Key decisions / constraints
- <decision or constraint> — <implication for continuation>

## Artifacts produced this session
- `<filename or ref>` — <what it is, where it lives>

## Next action
<the single immediate next step — one sentence>

## Completion criteria
- [ ] <observable outcome>
- [ ] <observable outcome>

## After completion
<what comes next, or "session complete">

## Other open threads (if any)
- <thread> — <1-line status>

Rules

  • One fenced code block. Always at the end of the response.
  • Task-completion oriented. The summary exists to let the next session finish the active tasking and know it's done — not to archive the full chat.
  • Token-efficient. No filler. If a field is empty, omit it entirely. Brevity over completeness.
  • Self-contained. A fresh Claude instance with no memory of this chat should be able to continue from the summary alone.
  • Reference artifacts, don't inline them. Filenames and paths, not full contents — unless the artifact is small (< ~20 lines) and critical to the next action.
  • Never invent. Mark unknowns <TBD>.
  • No emojis. Markdown headings, bullets, checkboxes only.
  • Don't restate userMemories. Ryan's persistent context is already loaded in every session. Only include memory-adjacent facts if they are actively relevant to the next step.
  • Push back on empty chats. If there's no active tasking worth packing, say so and ask what to summarize — don't generate filler.

Chaining

  • Upstream: Any active working chat — planning, building, debugging, designing.
  • Downstream: Pasted into a fresh Claude.ai chat.
  • Adjacent: chat-to-code-prompt if the next action is to execute in Claude Code; this skill is for Claude.ai → Claude.ai continuation.
  • Composes with: workflow-lock if the session revealed a reusable pattern; reminder-hub if the next action has a deadline worth a calendar entry.

Example

User: getting long in here — give me a context summary

Claude: Paste into a fresh Claude.ai chat to continue. Next action is a walkthrough prep, no repo involved.

# Context Summary — Cambourne second walkthrough prep

**Project:** Personal (real estate)

## Active Tasking
Preparing for the second walkthrough of 366 E Cambourne St (week of May 4). Goal is to validate the as-is condition and build the case for negotiating $330K down to $315–320K.

## State
- **Done:** Verbal agreement at $330K, as-is terms confirmed with Shelly (executor), electrical permit (2022) confirmed as panel-only
- **In progress:** Walkthrough checklist — HVAC, roof, foundation, plumbing, windows
- **Blocked on:** nothing

## Key decisions / constraints
- Contingent on Waterford sale (Krysta handling agent outreach in parallel)
- Target reduction: $10–15K off $330K, justified by as-is / estate-sale terms
- Net Waterford proceeds at $365K floor only support 10% down + PMI at $330K Cambourne

## Artifacts produced this session
- Cambourne Command Center React dashboard (Cormorant Garamond + warm cream palette) — local
- Devils-advocate hardening session — scored 82/100

## Next action
Build the walkthrough checklist as a printable one-pager grouped by system, with "evidence for reduction" column.

## Completion criteria
- [ ] Checklist printed and ready for May 4 walkthrough
- [ ] Counteroffer letter drafted, ready to send post-walkthrough

## After completion
Send counteroffer → await Shelly's response → proceed to offer acceptance or walk.

Want me to chain into drafting the walkthrough checklist now, or save this summary as-is?

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.