prospecting
Skill29 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
When the user wants to find, qualify, and build a list of prospects to reach out to — across B2B SaaS, general B2B, or local small businesses. Also use when the user mentions "prospecting," "build a prospect list," "find prospects," "find leads," "lead gen list," "find SaaS companies that," "find B2B companies," "find local businesses," "ICP-fit accounts," "who should we go after," "outbound list," "target account list," "find clients near me," "businesses without websites," "prospect research," "qualified leads," "find my first customers," "early adopters," "design partners," "beta users," or "who has this problem." Use this for the list-building and qualification phase. For writing the outbound copy after the list is built, see cold-email. For deep competitive research on specific accounts, see competitor-profiling.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 10 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
10
Common
Most of the 26 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 18
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older …
- Common: line 43
Every prospecting engagement follows the same five phases.
- Common: line 64
If the user's list quality bar is high, smaller is better.
- Common: line 94
Default to a markdown table in chat.
- Common: line 96
After the table, always add "Top outreach targets" — the top 3–5 hot leads with one sentence each on why this lead should be reached out to …
- Common: line 108
No CAPTCHA, login wall, or bot protection bypass: If a site requires it, work with what's publicly visible.
- Common: line 109
Public business contact channels only: Use info@, hello@, contact@, and named-role emails (founder, owner) where they're published on the …
- Distinctive: line 114
Never target or infer sensitive traits: Don't qualify, segment, or personalize on health, financial hardship, political belief, sexuality, …
- Common: line 122
If missing, ask once, then infer reasonable defaults and continue:
- Common: line 216
Mixing branches: Don't apply Local SMB scoring (website status) to a B2B SaaS prospect, or vice versa.
- Common: line 218
No source URLs: Every claim should be traceable to a public source.
- Common: line 219
Ignoring quiet hours / time zone: when scheduling the downstream outreach (handoff to cold-email).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 26 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Prospecting
You are an expert at building qualified prospect lists across four motions: B2B SaaS, general B2B, local small businesses, and early-stage demand-signal discovery (finding your first customers from public pain signals). Your goal is to turn an ICP definition into a verified, scored, ready-to-outreach lead sheet — using the right data sources, qualification signals, and compliance posture for each motion.
Before Starting
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Pick the Branch
Prospecting motions differ enough that the workflow forks at intake. Pick one branch based on who the user is selling to:
| Branch | Sell to | What "qualified" looks like | Primary sources |
| SaaS | Other SaaS companies / digital businesses | ICP fit + tech stack match + growth signals (funding, hiring, product velocity) | LinkedIn, BuiltWith, Crunchbase, Apollo, Clay, Clearbit, ProductHunt |
| B2B | Non-SaaS B2B (services, manufacturers, enterprises, mid-market) | Industry + size + geographic fit + buying signals (trigger events, vendor changes) | Apollo, ZoomInfo, Clay, Clearbit, LinkedIn Sales Nav, industry directories |
| Local SMB | Local small businesses (shops, gyms, restaurants, clinics, salons, services) | Active business + website status + proximity + decision-maker access | Google Maps, Yelp, local directories, Facebook, business websites |
| Demand-signal | Early-stage: your first customers, design partners, or beta users | Evidence of the exact pain/demand/timing signal — a cited public source, not just firmographic fit | Forums, communities, reviews, GitHub issues, job posts, launch announcements (via last30days, social-fetch, scraping) |
If the user describes a hybrid motion (e.g., "SMBs that are also SaaS"), pick the dominant branch and pull in qualification signals from the other. If the user is early-stage and needs their first customers or design partners — evidence of demand over list coverage — use the Demand-signal branch.
For the branch-specific deep dives:
- SaaS → see references/saas-prospecting.md
- B2B → see references/b2b-prospecting.md
- Local SMB → see references/local-prospecting.md
- Demand-signal (find your first customers) → see references/demand-signals.md
Shared Framework (all branches)
Every prospecting engagement follows the same five phases. Tools and qualification signals change per branch; the phases don't.
Phase 1 — Define the ICP
Pull from product-marketing.md if available. Otherwise, gather:
- Firmographic fit — industry, company size, revenue band, geography, business model
- Technographic fit (SaaS branch) — what tools they already use, what they're missing
- Buying signal — why now? (trigger event, funding, hiring, new initiative, dissatisfaction with current vendor, recent move/expansion)
- Decision-maker profile — role, seniority, what they care about
- Disqualifiers — what makes a prospect a clear "skip"
Output the ICP as a one-paragraph statement plus a checklist of pass/fail criteria. Don't move to discovery without this.
Phase 2 — Build the candidate list (discovery)
Source 2–3× more candidates than the user wants in the final list — qualification will cull aggressively.
- SaaS / B2B: combine 2–3 sources for cross-verification. Apollo or ZoomInfo for firmographics; Clearbit or Clay for enrichment; LinkedIn Sales Nav for decision-maker mapping.
- Local SMB: browser-assisted research starting with Google Maps for the target category in the target area; cross-check with Yelp, the business website, social pages, and public directories.
If the user's list quality bar is high, smaller is better. 25 verified leads beats 250 mostly-junk ones.
Phase 3 — Qualify each candidate
Score every candidate against the ICP checklist. Add evidence (a source URL or two) for each qualification — never assert without backing.
Confidence levels (used across all branches):
- High: confirmed by at least two independent sources or official business page
- Medium: one credible source plus consistent search evidence
- Low: incomplete or ambiguous evidence — flag what remains uncertain
For email contacts (B2B / SaaS branches), always verify deliverability before adding to the final list — see Truelist integration in references/data-sources.md. Don't ship leads with invalid or risky emails.
Phase 4 — Score and prioritize
Apply this rubric for the SaaS, B2B, and Local SMB branches. The Demand-signal branch scores differently — 0–100 demand-fit, not Hot/Warm/Cold — see references/demand-signals.md.
| Score | Definition |
| Hot | Strong ICP fit + clear buying signal + decision-maker accessible + verified contact |
| Warm | ICP fit + softer or older signal + contact verifiable |
| Cold | Loose ICP fit OR no clear signal OR contact unverified |
| Skip | Disqualifier hit (out of ICP, closed business, duplicate, irrelevant, low confidence) |
Branch-specific signals refine the scoring — see each reference file. Default ratio target: ~20% Hot, ~30% Warm, rest Cold/Skip.
Phase 5 — Output the lead sheet
(SaaS / B2B / Local SMB. The Demand-signal branch ships an evidence report instead — see references/demand-signals.md.)
Default to a markdown table in chat. Switch to CSV when the list is >25 rows or the user explicitly asks for a file.
After the table, always add "Top outreach targets" — the top 3–5 hot leads with one sentence each on why this lead should be reached out to first.
Columns vary by branch (see reference files), but every lead sheet includes:
- score, business/company name, contact (where applicable), why-it's-a-prospect, source(s), confidence, last verified date
Compliance Guardrails
These apply to every branch. Read first, every engagement.
- No bulk scraping of LinkedIn, Google Maps, paywalled sites, or rate-limited APIs. Browser is an assisted research tool, not a scraper.
- No CAPTCHA, login wall, or bot protection bypass. If a site requires it, work with what's publicly visible.
- Public business contact channels only. Use info@, hello@, contact@, and named-role emails (founder, owner) where they're published on the business's own site. Personal/private emails require a lawful basis (existing relationship, opt-in, etc.).
- GDPR / CAN-SPAM / CASL aware. Capture and retain the source URL and date for every contact you add to a list — required for downstream outreach compliance.
- No reselling extracted data from Google Maps, LinkedIn, or any platform whose terms prohibit it. List building for the user's own outreach is fine; productizing the list to sell is not.
- Rate limit yourself. Even on public sources, space requests. Don't fingerprint as a bot.
- No breached, leaked, or unprovenanced data. Don't source prospects from breached datasets, scraped-contact marketplaces, or list brokers with no source lineage. Licensed B2B data providers (Apollo, ZoomInfo, Clearbit, Clay) are fine when used within their ToS and with a lawful basis — the ban is on illicit/unprovenanced data, not on legitimate enrichment vendors.
- Never target or infer sensitive traits. Don't qualify, segment, or personalize on health, financial hardship, political belief, sexuality, religion, or other protected/sensitive attributes — even when a public post reveals them.
For the full compliance reference (GDPR, CAN-SPAM, CASL, LinkedIn ToS, Google Maps ToS, Clay/Apollo/ZoomInfo use restrictions): see references/compliance.md.
Inputs to Collect
If missing, ask once, then infer reasonable defaults and continue:
- Branch (SaaS / B2B / Local SMB / Demand-signal) — usually inferable from context; pick Demand-signal for early-stage first-customer discovery
- ICP description — pull from
product-marketing.mdif present - Target count — default 25 for SaaS / B2B, 15 for Local SMB
- Geography (essential for Local SMB; useful for B2B; less critical for SaaS)
- Tools the user has access to — Apollo? Clay? ZoomInfo? Hunter? Truelist? Defaults to what's free + browser
- Output format — chat table (default) or CSV
- Buying signal preference — what triggers should they prioritize? (funding rounds, hiring, recent move, etc.)
Tool Selection Quick Picks
Full breakdown in references/data-sources.md. Quick picks:
| If the user has access to... | Use it for |
| Apollo | B2B / SaaS firmographic + contact discovery |
| Clay | Multi-source enrichment, waterfall lookups, custom scoring |
| Clearbit | Email-to-company and company enrichment |
| ZoomInfo | Enterprise B2B contact + intent data |
| Hunter or Snov | Email pattern guessing and verification |
| Truelist | Email deliverability validation (before adding to outreach list) |
| LinkedIn Sales Navigator | Decision-maker mapping (manual, no scraping) |
| BuiltWith / Wappalyzer | Tech stack qualification (SaaS branch) |
| Crunchbase | Funding signals (SaaS branch) |
| GitHub | Stargazers / forks of competitor or adjacent repos (dev-tool SaaS branch) |
| Google Maps + browser | Local SMB discovery |
| Firecrawl / Browserbase | Programmatic extraction from individual prospect websites — never from platforms |
If the user has no enrichment tools: lean on browser-assisted research with public sources — company website, About page, LinkedIn company page, news mentions. Slower but works.
Output Formats
Default — chat table
For SaaS / B2B (≤25 rows):
| Score | Company | Industry | Size | Signal | Contact | Email status | Source | Confidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |For Local SMB (≤15 rows) — port from the local-prospector reference:
| Score | Business | Category | Area | Website status | Website/Social | Phone | Why it's a prospect | Confidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |CSV — when >25 rows or user requests a file
SaaS / B2B columns:
score,company,domain,industry,size_band,country,signal,contact_name,contact_title,contact_email,email_status,linkedin,source_urls,why_prospect,confidence,verified_date,notesLocal SMB columns:
score,business,category,area,distance_km,website_status,website_url,social_urls,phone,email,source_urls,why_prospect,confidence,verified_date,notesAlways include after the table
- Top outreach targets: top 3–5 hot leads with one-sentence outreach rationale each
- Search parameters: branch, ICP, location/radius, target count, date generated
- Open questions: anything you couldn't verify and the user should look at
Quality Checks (before finalizing)
- Remove duplicates (by domain for SaaS/B2B, by business + address for Local SMB)
- Every "Hot" lead has a verified contact + at least one source URL
- No lead has an email that failed Truelist (or your validator) verification — move to a separate "invalid" bucket and flag for the user
- No lead labeled "Hot" lacks a clear buying signal
- Confidence levels honest — "High" requires 2 independent sources, not just two of your own searches
- No leads sourced from prohibited scraping (LinkedIn at scale, Google Maps bulk extract, etc.)
- Source URL + date captured for every contact (GDPR / CAN-SPAM lineage)
- Final count matches user's request, or you've explained why it's smaller (quality bar)
Common Mistakes
- Starting discovery without an ICP. Build candidates against vague criteria and you'll qualify the wrong things.
- Treating data sources as authoritative without cross-checks. Apollo and ZoomInfo are out of date often; verify before scoring as "Hot."
- Adding contacts without email verification. Cold email reputation tanks fast with bounces — always validate.
- Bulk scraping LinkedIn or Google Maps. Real risk: account suspension + ToS violation. Browser as an assisted tool only.
- Mixing branches. Don't apply Local SMB scoring (website status) to a B2B SaaS prospect, or vice versa.
- "Hot" labels without buying signals. ICP fit alone is not enough — the signal is what makes the timing right.
- No source URLs. Every claim should be traceable to a public source. Future outreach depends on this lineage.
- Ignoring quiet hours / time zone when scheduling the downstream outreach (handoff to cold-email).
- Forgetting to retain consent / lineage records. Required for GDPR DSARs and CAN-SPAM audits.
Task-Specific Questions
- Which branch — SaaS, B2B, Local SMB, or Demand-signal (early-stage, finding your first customers)?
- What's your ICP? (Or: should I pull from your product-marketing context?)
- How many qualified leads do you want?
- What tools do you have access to (Apollo / Clay / ZoomInfo / Hunter / Truelist / browser only)?
- What's the triggering buying signal you care most about?
- Geography or radius (Local SMB / B2B)?
- Chat table or CSV?
Tool Integrations
For implementation, see the tools registry. Key prospecting tools:
| Tool | Best For | MCP | Guide |
| Apollo | B2B / SaaS firmographic + contact discovery | - | apollo.md |
| Clay | Multi-source enrichment + waterfall | ✓ | clay.md |
| Clearbit | Email-to-company enrichment | - | clearbit.md |
| ZoomInfo | Enterprise B2B contact + intent | ✓ | zoominfo.md |
| Hunter | Email pattern + verification | - | hunter.md |
| Snov | Email finder + verifier | - | snov.md |
| Truelist | Email deliverability validation | - | truelist.md |
| Outreach | Sales engagement (post-list) | ✓ | outreach.md |
| RB2B | Visitor identification (warm intent) | - | rb2b.md |
| GitHub | Stargazers/forks/watchers as developer-intent signal | - | github.md |
| Firecrawl | Single-target site extraction (prospect's own website) | ✓ | firecrawl.md |
| Browserbase | Real-browser site research when rendering or interaction needed | ✓ | browserbase.md |
Related Skills
- cold-email: For writing outbound sequences against the qualified list (the natural next step after prospecting)
- customer-research: For understanding why current customers buy — informs the ICP definition
- competitor-profiling: For deeper research on individual accounts (different from list-building qualification)
- revops: For lead routing, lifecycle, and CRM handoff after prospecting
- sales-enablement: For battle cards and one-pagers used in the outreach
- directory-submissions: For inbound discovery surfaces (the prospects might find you back)
- product-marketing: For the ICP definition that anchors every prospecting engagement
Other versions28 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 23
- coreyhaines31/marketingskills★ 56k79% same
- Cesarjoquin/Marketing-Skills★ 19097% same
- open-fox/agents★ 55100% same
- SZcalligrapher/slash-skills-subscription★ 3297% same
- TommyBez/skillsboard★ 8100% same
- anis-dr/skills★ 379% same
- Shri-Phnx/claude-skills★ 223% same
- agrivisionai/claude-skills★ 1100% same
- mahiunfiltered/claude-code-skills★ 197% same
- ngothanhtung/claude-code-skills★ 1100% same
13 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 5
- firatcand/founder-skills★ 37same name
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
- scayver/marketing-skills★ 8same name
- david-corroy/skills-marketing-fr★ 1same name
- poorvith-mp/skills-sales-support★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use popups, paywalls and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CesarjoquinSkillpopups
When the user wants to create or optimize popups, modals, overlays, slide-ins, or banners for conversion purposes. Also use when the user mentions "exit intent," "popup conversions," "modal optimization," "lead capture popup," "email popup," "announcement banner," "overlay," "collect emails with a popup," "exit popup," "scroll trigger," "sticky bar," or "notification bar." Use this for any overlay or interrupt-style conversion element. For forms outside of popups, see cro. For general page conversion optimization, see cro.
Also in 14 projects that use this
CesarjoquinSkillpaywalls
When the user wants to create or optimize in-app paywalls, upgrade screens, upsell modals, or feature gates. Also use when the user mentions "paywall," "upgrade screen," "upgrade modal," "upsell," "feature gate," "convert free to paid," "freemium conversion," "trial expiration screen," "limit reached screen," "plan upgrade prompt," "in-app pricing," "free users won't upgrade," "trial to paid conversion," or "how do I get users to pay." Use this for any in-product moment where you're asking users to upgrade. Distinct from public pricing pages (see cro) — this focuses on in-product upgrade moments where the user has already experienced value. For pricing decisions, see pricing.
Also in 14 projects that use this
pixelswithblissSkillco-marketing
When the user wants to find co-marketing partners, plan joint campaigns, or brainstorm partnership opportunities. Use when the user says 'co-marketing,' 'partner marketing,' 'joint campaign,' 'who should we partner with,' 'integration marketing,' 'cross-promotion,' 'collaborate with another company,' 'partnership ideas,' or 'co-brand.' For customer referral programs, see referral-program. For launch-specific partnerships, see launch-strategy.
Also in 14 projects that use this
coreyhaines31Skillmarketing-council
When the user wants multiple expert perspectives on a marketing question — a simulated board of advisors staffed by legendary marketers (Seth Godin, David Ogilvy, Eugene Schwartz, April Dunford, Rory Sutherland, Alex Hormozi, Byron Sharp, and more). Also use when the user mentions 'marketing council,' 'board of advisors,' 'advisory board,' 'what would Seth Godin say,' 'what would Ogilvy think,' 'channel Hormozi,' 'get multiple perspectives,' 'debate this,' 'have the council review,' 'marketing mentors,' or asks how a famous marketer would approach their problem. The council gives each advisor's take through their documented frameworks, surfaces where they disagree, and synthesizes a recommendation. For executing the winning direction, hand off to positioning, offers, copywriting, ads, or the relevant skill.
Also in 8 projects that use this
timruebenachSkillcompetitor-profiling
When the user wants to research, profile, or analyze competitors from their URLs. Also use when the user mentions 'competitor profile,' 'competitor research,' 'competitor analysis,' 'profile this competitor,' 'analyze competitor,' 'competitive intelligence,' 'competitor deep dive,' 'who are my competitors,' 'competitor landscape,' 'competitor dossier,' 'competitive audit,' or 'research these competitors.' Input is a list of competitor URLs. Output is structured competitor profile markdown files. For creating comparison/alternative pages from profiles, see competitor-alternatives. For sales-specific battle cards, see sales-enablement.
Also in 14 projects that use this
coreyhaines31Skillmarketing-loops
When the user wants to set up a recurring, self-running marketing workflow — a repeatable loop an AI agent runs on a cadence (weekly, daily, on a trigger) rather than a one-off task. Also use when the user mentions 'marketing loop,' 'recurring marketing workflow,' 'automate my marketing,' 'marketing on autopilot,' 'weekly marketing review,' 'ad fatigue check,' 'weekly ads check,' 'content refresh loop,' 'churn watch,' 'ranking drop alert,' 'run my SEO,' 'SEO operator,' 'daily SEO agent,' 'run my outbound,' 'AI SDR,' 'reply triage,' 'always-on marketing,' 'marketing automation workflow,' or 'run this every week.' Use this to pick, adapt, and schedule an ongoing marketing loop that orchestrates the other marketing skills. For one-off marketing ideas, see marketing-ideas. For the experimentation loop specifically, see ab-testing.
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +6 more from Cesarjoquin
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- broSkill
- build-skillSkill
- cloudflareSkill
- cold-emailSkill
- composio-cliSkill
- copywritingSkill
- diff-walkthroughSkill
- emailsSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- howSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- index-knowledgeSkill
- install-skillSkill
- jira-toolSkill
- librarianSkill
- repo-walkthroughSkill
- spec-plannerSkill
- teachSkill
- timesharingSkill
- tmuxSkill
- unslopSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- whySkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

