agentleFS
roerohanroerohan/skills/index-knowledge/SKILL.md

index-knowledge

Skill29 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Generate hierarchical AGENTS.md knowledge base for a codebase. Creates root + complexity-scored subdirectory documentation.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 7 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 7

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Default: Update mode (modify existing + create new where warranted)

    line 17
  2. Common:

    DYNAMIC AGENT SPAWNING: After bash analysis, spawn ADDITIONAL explore agents based on project scale:

    line 94
  3. Very specific:

    If --create-new: Read all existing first (preserve context) → then delete all → regenerate.

    line 164
  4. Common:

    LSP Fallback: If unavailable, rely on explore agents + AST-grep.

    line 183
  5. Common:

    Static agent count: MUST vary agents based on project size/depth

    line 352
  6. Common:

    Sequential execution: MUST parallel (multiple Task calls in one message)

    line 353
  7. Very specific:

    Ignoring existing: ALWAYS read existing first, even with --create-new

    line 354
  8. Common:

    Over-documenting: Not every dir needs AGENTS.md

    line 355
  9. Common:

    Generic content: Remove anything that applies to ALL projects

    line 357

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

index-knowledge

Generate hierarchical AGENTS.md files. Root + complexity-scored subdirectories.

Usage

--create-new   # Read existing → remove all → regenerate from scratch
--max-depth=2  # Limit directory depth (default: 5)

Default: Update mode (modify existing + create new where warranted)


Workflow (High-Level)

  1. Discovery + Analysis (concurrent)
    • Launch parallel explore agents (multiple Task calls in one message)
    • Main session: bash structure + LSP codemap + read existing AGENTS.md
  2. Score & Decide - Determine AGENTS.md locations from merged findings
  3. Generate - Root first, then subdirs in parallel
  4. Review - Deduplicate, trim, validate
<critical> **TodoWrite ALL phases. Mark in_progress → completed in real-time.**
TodoWrite([
  { id: "discovery", content: "Fire explore agents + LSP codemap + read existing", status: "pending", priority: "high" },
  { id: "scoring", content: "Score directories, determine locations", status: "pending", priority: "high" },
  { id: "generate", content: "Generate AGENTS.md files (root + subdirs)", status: "pending", priority: "high" },
  { id: "review", content: "Deduplicate, validate, trim", status: "pending", priority: "medium" }
])
</critical>

Phase 1: Discovery + Analysis (Concurrent)

Mark "discovery" as in_progress.

Launch Parallel Explore Agents

Multiple Task calls in a single message execute in parallel. Results return directly.

// All Task calls in ONE message = parallel execution

Task(
  description="project structure",
  subagent_type="explore",
  prompt="Project structure: PREDICT standard patterns for detected language → REPORT deviations only"
)

Task(
  description="entry points",
  subagent_type="explore",
  prompt="Entry points: FIND main files → REPORT non-standard organization"
)

Task(
  description="conventions",
  subagent_type="explore",
  prompt="Conventions: FIND config files (.eslintrc, pyproject.toml, .editorconfig) → REPORT project-specific rules"
)

Task(
  description="anti-patterns",
  subagent_type="explore",
  prompt="Anti-patterns: FIND 'DO NOT', 'NEVER', 'ALWAYS', 'DEPRECATED' comments → LIST forbidden patterns"
)

Task(
  description="build/ci",
  subagent_type="explore",
  prompt="Build/CI: FIND .github/workflows, Makefile → REPORT non-standard patterns"
)

Task(
  description="test patterns",
  subagent_type="explore",
  prompt="Test patterns: FIND test configs, test structure → REPORT unique conventions"
)
<dynamic-agents> **DYNAMIC AGENT SPAWNING**: After bash analysis, spawn ADDITIONAL explore agents based on project scale:
FactorThresholdAdditional Agents
Total files>100+1 per 100 files
Total lines>10k+1 per 10k lines
Directory depth≥4+2 for deep exploration
Large files (>500 lines)>10 files+1 for complexity hotspots
Monorepodetected+1 per package/workspace
Multiple languages>1+1 per language
# Measure project scale first
total_files=$(find . -type f -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -not -path '*/.git/*' | wc -l)
total_lines=$(find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.py" -o -name "*.go" \) -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -exec wc -l {} + 2>/dev/null | tail -1 | awk '{print $1}')
large_files=$(find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.py" \) -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -exec wc -l {} + 2>/dev/null | awk '$1 > 500 {count++} END {print count+0}')
max_depth=$(find . -type d -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -not -path '*/.git/*' | awk -F/ '{print NF}' | sort -rn | head -1)

Example spawning (all in ONE message for parallel execution):

// 500 files, 50k lines, depth 6, 15 large files → spawn additional agents
Task(
  description="large files",
  subagent_type="explore",
  prompt="Large file analysis: FIND files >500 lines, REPORT complexity hotspots"
)

Task(
  description="deep modules",
  subagent_type="explore",
  prompt="Deep modules at depth 4+: FIND hidden patterns, internal conventions"
)

Task(
  description="cross-cutting",
  subagent_type="explore",
  prompt="Cross-cutting concerns: FIND shared utilities across directories"
)
// ... more based on calculation
</dynamic-agents>

Main Session: Concurrent Analysis

While Task agents execute, main session does:

1. Bash Structural Analysis

# Directory depth + file counts
find . -type d -not -path '*/\.*' -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -not -path '*/venv/*' -not -path '*/dist/*' -not -path '*/build/*' | awk -F/ '{print NF-1}' | sort -n | uniq -c

# Files per directory (top 30)
find . -type f -not -path '*/\.*' -not -path '*/node_modules/*' | sed 's|/[^/]*$||' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -30

# Code concentration by extension
find . -type f \( -name "*.py" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.go" -o -name "*.rs" \) -not -path '*/node_modules/*' | sed 's|/[^/]*$||' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20

# Existing AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md
find . -type f \( -name "AGENTS.md" -o -name "CLAUDE.md" \) -not -path '*/node_modules/*' 2>/dev/null

2. Read Existing AGENTS.md

For each existing file found:
  Read(filePath=file)
  Extract: key insights, conventions, anti-patterns
  Store in EXISTING_AGENTS map

If --create-new: Read all existing first (preserve context) → then delete all → regenerate.

3. LSP Codemap (if available)

lsp_servers()  # Check availability

# Entry points (parallel)
lsp_document_symbols(filePath="src/index.ts")
lsp_document_symbols(filePath="main.py")

# Key symbols (parallel)
lsp_workspace_symbols(filePath=".", query="class")
lsp_workspace_symbols(filePath=".", query="interface")
lsp_workspace_symbols(filePath=".", query="function")

# Centrality for top exports
lsp_find_references(filePath="...", line=X, character=Y)

LSP Fallback: If unavailable, rely on explore agents + AST-grep.

Merge: bash + LSP + existing + Task agent results. Mark "discovery" as completed.


Phase 2: Scoring & Location Decision

Mark "scoring" as in_progress.

Scoring Matrix

FactorWeightHigh ThresholdSource
File count3x>20bash
Subdir count2x>5bash
Code ratio2x>70%bash
Unique patterns1xHas own configexplore
Module boundary2xHas index.ts/init.pybash
Symbol density2x>30 symbolsLSP
Export count2x>10 exportsLSP
Reference centrality3x>20 refsLSP

Decision Rules

ScoreAction
Root (.)ALWAYS create
>15Create AGENTS.md
8-15Create if distinct domain
<8Skip (parent covers)

Output

AGENTS_LOCATIONS = [
  { path: ".", type: "root" },
  { path: "src/hooks", score: 18, reason: "high complexity" },
  { path: "src/api", score: 12, reason: "distinct domain" }
]

Mark "scoring" as completed.


Phase 3: Generate AGENTS.md

Mark "generate" as in_progress.

Root AGENTS.md (Full Treatment)

# PROJECT KNOWLEDGE BASE

**Generated:** {TIMESTAMP}
**Commit:** {SHORT_SHA}
**Branch:** {BRANCH}

## OVERVIEW
{1-2 sentences: what + core stack}

## STRUCTURE
\`\`\`
{root}/
├── {dir}/    # {non-obvious purpose only}
└── {entry}
\`\`\`

## WHERE TO LOOK
| Task | Location | Notes |
|------|----------|-------|

## CODE MAP
{From LSP - skip if unavailable or project <10 files}

| Symbol | Type | Location | Refs | Role |

## CONVENTIONS
{ONLY deviations from standard}

## ANTI-PATTERNS (THIS PROJECT)
{Explicitly forbidden here}

## UNIQUE STYLES
{Project-specific}

## COMMANDS
\`\`\`bash
{dev/test/build}
\`\`\`

## NOTES
{Gotchas}

Quality gates: 50-150 lines, no generic advice, no obvious info.

Subdirectory AGENTS.md (Parallel)

Launch general agents for each location in ONE message (parallel execution):

// All in single message = parallel
Task(
  description="AGENTS.md for src/hooks",
  subagent_type="general",
  prompt="Generate AGENTS.md for: src/hooks
    - Reason: high complexity
    - 30-80 lines max
    - NEVER repeat parent content
    - Sections: OVERVIEW (1 line), STRUCTURE (if >5 subdirs), WHERE TO LOOK, CONVENTIONS (if different), ANTI-PATTERNS
    - Write directly to src/hooks/AGENTS.md"
)

Task(
  description="AGENTS.md for src/api",
  subagent_type="general",
  prompt="Generate AGENTS.md for: src/api
    - Reason: distinct domain
    - 30-80 lines max
    - NEVER repeat parent content
    - Sections: OVERVIEW (1 line), STRUCTURE (if >5 subdirs), WHERE TO LOOK, CONVENTIONS (if different), ANTI-PATTERNS
    - Write directly to src/api/AGENTS.md"
)
// ... one Task per AGENTS_LOCATIONS entry

Results return directly. Mark "generate" as completed.


Phase 4: Review & Deduplicate

Mark "review" as in_progress.

For each generated file:

  • Remove generic advice
  • Remove parent duplicates
  • Trim to size limits
  • Verify telegraphic style

Mark "review" as completed.


Final Report

=== index-knowledge Complete ===

Mode: {update | create-new}

Files:
  ✓ ./AGENTS.md (root, {N} lines)
  ✓ ./src/hooks/AGENTS.md ({N} lines)

Dirs Analyzed: {N}
AGENTS.md Created: {N}
AGENTS.md Updated: {N}

Hierarchy:
  ./AGENTS.md
  └── src/hooks/AGENTS.md

Anti-Patterns

  • Static agent count: MUST vary agents based on project size/depth
  • Sequential execution: MUST parallel (multiple Task calls in one message)
  • Ignoring existing: ALWAYS read existing first, even with --create-new
  • Over-documenting: Not every dir needs AGENTS.md
  • Redundancy: Child never repeats parent
  • Generic content: Remove anything that applies to ALL projects
  • Verbose style: Telegraphic or die

Download now (ZIP)

Trending

Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Aug 30: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 6: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projects
Aug 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 0 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.