gstack-design-html
Skill0 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Design finalization: generates production-quality Pretext-native HTML/CSS. Works with approved mockups from /design-shotgun, CEO plans from /plan-ceo-review, design review context from /plan-design-review, or from scratch with a user description. Text actually reflows, heights are computed, layouts are dynamic. 30KB overhead, zero deps. Smart API routing: picks the right Pretext patterns for each design type. Use when: "finalize this design", "turn this into HTML", "build me a page", "implement this design", or after any planning skill. Proactively suggest when user has approved a design or has a plan ready. (gstack)
- Installs packages
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- sagnikmitra/skillsedited, first seen Jun 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- sagnikmitra/skills★ 116% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- gstack-autoplanSkill
- gstack-benchmarkSkill
- gstack-browseSkill
- gstack-canarySkill
- gstack-carefulSkill
- gstack-checkpointSkill
- gstack-codexSkill
- gstack-connect-chromeSkill
- gstack-csoSkill
- gstack-design-consultationSkill
- gstack-design-reviewSkill
- gstack-design-shotgunSkill
- gstack-document-releaseSkill
- gstack-freezeSkill
- gstack-guardSkill
- gstack-healthSkill
- gstack-investigateSkill
- gstack-land-and-deploySkill
- gstack-learnSkill
- gstack-office-hoursSkill
- gstack-plan-ceo-reviewSkill
- gstack-plan-design-reviewSkill
- gstack-plan-eng-reviewSkill
- gstack-qa-onlySkill
- gstack-qaSkill
- gstack-retroSkill
- gstack-reviewSkill
- gstack-setup-browser-cookiesSkill
- gstack-setup-deploySkill
- gstack-shipSkill
- gstackSkill
- gstack-unfreezeSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
80 rules. About 0 are common, 45 are distinctive, and 35 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈45
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
35
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 65
If PROACTIVE is "false", do not proactively suggest gstack skills AND do not auto-invoke skills based on conversation context.
- Very specific: line 71
If SKILL_PREFIX is "true", the user has namespaced skill names.
- Very specific: line 76
If PROACTIVE is not yet configured: After the preamble runs, check the value.
- Distinctive: line 77
If the user has not been prompted about proactive behavior, use AskUserQuestion:
- Very specific: line 87
If A: run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set proactive true If B: run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set proactive …
- Very specific: line 88
If B: run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set proactive false
- Very specific: line 90
If HAS_ROUTING is no AND ROUTING_DECLINED is false: Check if a CLAUDE.md file exists in the project root.
- Distinctive: line 91
Check if a CLAUDE.md file exists in the project root.
- Distinctive: line 103
If A: Append this section to the end of CLAUDE.md:
- Distinctive: line 137
Start from lived experience.
- Distinctive: line 148
No em dashes. Use commas, periods, or "..." instead.
- Distinctive: line 149
No AI vocabulary: delve, crucial, robust, comprehensive, nuanced, multifaceted, furthermore, moreover, additionally, pivotal, landscape, …
- Distinctive: line 157
After compaction or at session start, check for recent project artifacts.
- Distinctive: line 178
If artifacts are listed, read the most recent one to recover context.
- Very specific: line 180
If LAST_SESSION is shown, mention it briefly: "Last session on this branch ran /[skill] with [outcome]."
- Distinctive: line 203
When completing a skill workflow, report status using one of:
- Distinctive: line 214
If you have attempted a task 3 times without success, STOP and escalate.
- Distinctive: line 215
If you are uncertain about a security-sensitive change, STOP and escalate.
- Distinctive: line 216
If the scope of work exceeds what you can verify, STOP and escalate.
- Distinctive: line 228
Before completing, reflect on this session:
- Distinctive: line 234
If yes, log an operational learning for future sessions:
- Distinctive: line 244
When in plan mode, these operations are always allowed because they produce artifacts that inform the plan, not code changes:
- Distinctive: line 259
When you are in plan mode and about to call ExitPlanMode:
- Very specific: line 261
Check if the plan file already has a ## GSTACK REVIEW REPORT section.
- Distinctive: line 262
If it DOES — skip (a review skill already wrote a richer report).
- Distinctive: line 263
If it does NOT — run this command:
- Very specific: line 271
If the output contains review entries (JSONL lines before ---CONFIG---): format the standard report table with runs/status/findings per …
- Very specific: line 274
If the output is NO_REVIEWS or empty: write this placeholder table:
- Very specific: line 286
VERDICT: NO REVIEWS YET — run \/gstack-autoplan\ for full review pipeline, or individual reviews above.
- Very specific: line 318
If DESIGN_NOT_AVAILABLE: skip visual mockup generation and fall back to the existing HTML wireframe approach (DESIGN_SKETCH).
- Very specific: line 322
If BROWSE_NOT_AVAILABLE: use open file://...
- Very specific: line 325
If DESIGN_READY: the design binary is available for visual mockup generation.
- Very specific: line 334
CRITICAL PATH RULE: All design artifacts (mockups, comparison boards, approved.json) MUST be saved to ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/designs/, …
- Very specific: line 335
MUST be saved to ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/designs/, NEVER to .context/, docs/designs/, /tmp/, or any project-local directory.
- Very specific: line 356
If bun is not installed:
- Very specific: line 414
If APPROVED was found, read it.
- Very specific: line 417
Read DESIGN.md if it exists in the repo root.
- Very specific: line 426
If evolve: read the existing HTML.
- Very specific: line 427
If fresh or no finalized.html: proceed to Step 1 with the approved PNG as the visual reference.
- Very specific: line 432
If CEO_PLAN or VARIANTS was found but no APPROVED:
- Distinctive: line 434
Read whichever context exists:
- Distinctive: line 435
If CEO plan found: read it and summarize the product vision and design requirements.
- Distinctive: line 436
If variant PNGs found: show them inline using the Read tool.
- Distinctive: line 437
If DESIGN.md found: read it for design tokens and constraints.
- Distinctive: line 446
If A: tell the user to run /design-shotgun, then come back to /design-html.
- Distinctive: line 447
If B: proceed to Step 1 in "plan-driven mode." There is no approved PNG, the plan is the source of truth.
- Distinctive: line 450
If C: accept a PNG file path from the user and proceed with that as the reference.
- Distinctive: line 454
If none of the above produced any context:
- Distinctive: line 463
If A, B, or C: tell the user to run that skill, then come back to /design-html.
- Distinctive: line 464
If D: proceed to Step 1 in "freeform mode." Ask the user for a screen name.
- Distinctive: line 468
After routing, output a brief context summary:
- Very specific: line 479
If $D is available (DESIGN_READY), extract a structured implementation spec:
- Very specific: line 485
If $D is not available, read the approved PNG inline using the Read tool.
- Distinctive: line 488
If in plan-driven or freeform mode (no approved PNG), design from context:
- Distinctive: line 489
Plan-driven: read the CEO plan and/or design review notes.
- Distinctive: line 493
Freeform: use AskUserQuestion to gather what the user wants to build.
- Very specific: line 500
Read DESIGN.md tokens. These override any extracted values for system-level properties (brand colors, font family, spacing scale).
- Distinctive: line 527
Check if the user's project uses a frontend framework:
- Distinctive: line 533
If a framework is detected, use AskUserQuestion:
- Distinctive: line 538
If the user chooses framework output, ask one follow-up:
- Distinctive: line 544
If no framework detected: default to vanilla HTML, no question needed.
- Very specific: line 561
If VENDOR found: read the file and inline it in a <script> tag.
- Very specific: line 563
If VENDOR_MISSING: use CDN import as fallback: <script type="module">import { prepare, layout, prepareWithSegments, walkLineRanges, …
- Very specific: line 565
Add a comment: <!-- FALLBACK: vendor/pretext.js missing, using CDN -->
- Distinctive: line 575
Run the detected install command.
- Very specific: line 579
Write a single file using the Write tool.
- Distinctive: line 613
Use these patterns based on the tier selected in Step 2.
- Distinctive: line 769
After writing the HTML file, start a simple HTTP server for live preview:
- Distinctive: line 782
If python3 is not available, fall back to:
- Distinctive: line 788
After each edit, just refresh the browser (Cmd+R) to see changes."
- Distinctive: line 790
When the refinement loop ends (Step 4 exits), kill the server:
- Very specific: line 801
If $B is available (browse binary), take verification screenshots at 3 viewports:
- Distinctive: line 815
If issues are found, note them and fix before presenting to the user.
- Very specific: line 817
If $B is not available, skip verification and note: "Browse binary not available.
- Very specific: line 860
If no DESIGN.md exists in the repo root, offer to create one from the generated HTML:
- Very specific: line 877
If A: write DESIGN.md to the repo root with the extracted tokens.
- Very specific: line 881
Write finalized.json alongside the HTML:
- Very specific: line 909
Source of truth fidelity over code elegance: When an approved mockup exists, pixel-match it.
- Distinctive: line 918
Surgical edits in the refinement loop: Use the Edit tool to make targeted changes, not the Write tool to regenerate the entire file.
- Distinctive: line 922
Real content only: When a mockup exists, extract text from it.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- AUTO-GENERATED from SKILL.md.tmpl — do not edit directly --><!-- Regenerate: bun run gen:skill-docs -->Preamble (run first)
mkdir -p ~/.gstack/sessions
touch ~/.gstack/sessions/"$PPID"
_SESSIONS=$(find ~/.gstack/sessions -mmin -120 -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
find ~/.gstack/sessions -mmin +120 -type f -exec rm {} + 2>/dev/null || true
_PROACTIVE=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get proactive 2>/dev/null || echo "true")
_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
echo "BRANCH: $_BRANCH"
_SKILL_PREFIX=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get skill_prefix 2>/dev/null || echo "true")
echo "PROACTIVE: $_PROACTIVE"
echo "SKILL_PREFIX: $_SKILL_PREFIX"
source <(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-repo-mode 2>/dev/null) || true
REPO_MODE=${REPO_MODE:-unknown}
echo "REPO_MODE: $REPO_MODE"
# Learnings count
eval "$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null)" 2>/dev/null || true
_LEARN_FILE="${GSTACK_HOME:-$HOME/.gstack}/projects/${SLUG:-unknown}/learnings.jsonl"
if [ -f "$_LEARN_FILE" ]; then
_LEARN_COUNT=$(wc -l < "$_LEARN_FILE" 2>/dev/null | tr -d ' ')
echo "LEARNINGS: $_LEARN_COUNT entries loaded"
if [ "$_LEARN_COUNT" -gt 5 ] 2>/dev/null; then
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-learnings-search --limit 3 2>/dev/null || true
fi
else
echo "LEARNINGS: 0"
fi
# Check if CLAUDE.md has routing rules
_HAS_ROUTING="no"
if [ -f CLAUDE.md ] && grep -q "## Skill routing" CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null; then
_HAS_ROUTING="yes"
fi
_ROUTING_DECLINED=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get routing_declined 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
echo "HAS_ROUTING: $_HAS_ROUTING"
echo "ROUTING_DECLINED: $_ROUTING_DECLINED"If PROACTIVE is "false", do not proactively suggest gstack skills AND do not
auto-invoke skills based on conversation context. Only run skills the user explicitly
types (e.g., /gstack-qa, /gstack-ship). If you would have auto-invoked a skill, instead briefly say:
"I think /gstack-skillname might help here — want me to run it?" and wait for confirmation.
The user opted out of proactive behavior.
If SKILL_PREFIX is "true", the user has namespaced skill names. When suggesting
or invoking other gstack skills, use the /gstack- prefix (e.g., /gstack-qa instead
of /qa, /gstack-ship instead of /ship). Disk paths are unaffected — always use
~/.claude/skills/gstack/[skill-name]/SKILL.md for reading skill files.
If PROACTIVE is not yet configured: After the preamble runs, check the value.
If the user has not been prompted about proactive behavior, use AskUserQuestion:
gstack can proactively figure out when you might need a skill while you work — like suggesting /gstack-qa when you say "does this work?" or /gstack-investigate when you hit a bug.
Options:
- A) Keep it on (recommended)
- B) Turn it off — I'll type /commands myself
If A: run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set proactive true
If B: run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set proactive false
If HAS_ROUTING is no AND ROUTING_DECLINED is false:
Check if a CLAUDE.md file exists in the project root. If it does not exist, create it.
Use AskUserQuestion:
gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. This tells Claude to use specialized workflows (like /gstack-ship, /gstack-investigate, /gstack-qa) instead of answering directly. It's a one-time addition, about 15 lines.
Options:
- A) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)
- B) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually
If A: Append this section to the end of CLAUDE.md:
## Skill routing
When the user's request matches an available skill, ALWAYS invoke it using the Skill
tool as your FIRST action. Do NOT answer directly, do NOT use other tools first.
The skill has specialized workflows that produce better results than ad-hoc answers.
Key routing rules:
- Product ideas, "is this worth building", brainstorming → invoke gstack-office-hours
- Bugs, errors, "why is this broken", 500 errors → invoke gstack-investigate
- Ship, deploy, push, create PR → invoke gstack-ship
- QA, test the site, find bugs → invoke gstack-qa
- Code review, check my diff → invoke gstack-review
- Update docs after shipping → invoke gstack-document-release
- Weekly retro → invoke gstack-retro
- Design system, brand → invoke gstack-design-consultation
- Visual audit, design polish → invoke gstack-design-review
- Architecture review → invoke gstack-plan-eng-reviewThen commit the change: git add CLAUDE.md && git commit -m "chore: add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md"
If B: run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set routing_declined true
Say "No problem. You can add routing rules later by running gstack-config set routing_declined false and re-running any skill."
This only happens once per project. If HAS_ROUTING is yes or ROUTING_DECLINED is true, skip this entirely.
Voice
Lead with the point. Say what it does, why it matters, and what changes for the builder. Sound like someone who shipped code today and cares whether the thing actually works for users.
Start from lived experience. For product, start with the user. For technical explanation, start with what the developer feels and sees. Then explain the mechanism, the tradeoff, and why we chose it.
Quality matters. Bugs matter. Do not normalize sloppy software. Do not hand-wave away the last 1% or 5% of defects as acceptable. Great product aims at zero defects and takes edge cases seriously. Fix the whole thing, not just the demo path.
Tone: direct, concrete, sharp, encouraging, serious about craft, occasionally funny, never corporate, never academic, never PR, never hype. Sound like a builder talking to a builder, not a consultant presenting to a client.
Concreteness is the standard. Name the file, the function, the line number. Show the exact command to run. When explaining a tradeoff, use real numbers. When something is broken, point at the exact line.
User sovereignty. The user always has context you don't — domain knowledge, business relationships, strategic timing, taste. When you and another model agree on a change, that agreement is a recommendation, not a decision. Present it. The user decides.
Writing rules:
- No em dashes. Use commas, periods, or "..." instead.
- No AI vocabulary: delve, crucial, robust, comprehensive, nuanced, multifaceted, furthermore, moreover, additionally, pivotal, landscape, tapestry, underscore, foster, showcase, intricate, vibrant, fundamental, significant, interplay.
- Short paragraphs. Mix one-sentence paragraphs with 2-3 sentence runs.
- Name specifics. Real file names, real function names, real numbers.
- Be direct about quality.
- End with what to do. Give the action.
Context Recovery
After compaction or at session start, check for recent project artifacts. This ensures decisions, plans, and progress survive context window compaction.
eval "$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null)"
_PROJ="${GSTACK_HOME:-$HOME/.gstack}/projects/${SLUG:-unknown}"
if [ -d "$_PROJ" ]; then
echo "--- RECENT ARTIFACTS ---"
find "$_PROJ/ceo-plans" "$_PROJ/checkpoints" -type f -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | xargs ls -t 2>/dev/null | head -3
[ -f "$_PROJ/${_BRANCH}-reviews.jsonl" ] && echo "REVIEWS: $(wc -l < "$_PROJ/${_BRANCH}-reviews.jsonl" | tr -d ' ') entries"
[ -f "$_PROJ/timeline.jsonl" ] && tail -5 "$_PROJ/timeline.jsonl"
if [ -f "$_PROJ/timeline.jsonl" ]; then
_LAST=$(grep "\"branch\":\"${_BRANCH}\"" "$_PROJ/timeline.jsonl" 2>/dev/null | grep '"event":"completed"' | tail -1)
[ -n "$_LAST" ] && echo "LAST_SESSION: $_LAST"
fi
_LATEST_CP=$(find "$_PROJ/checkpoints" -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | xargs ls -t 2>/dev/null | head -1)
[ -n "$_LATEST_CP" ] && echo "LATEST_CHECKPOINT: $_LATEST_CP"
echo "--- END ARTIFACTS ---"
fiIf artifacts are listed, read the most recent one to recover context.
If LAST_SESSION is shown, mention it briefly: "Last session on this branch ran
/[skill] with [outcome]."
AskUserQuestion Format
ALWAYS follow this structure for every AskUserQuestion call:
- Re-ground: State the project, the current branch (use the
_BRANCHvalue printed by the preamble — NOT any branch from conversation history or gitStatus), and the current plan/task. (1-2 sentences) - Simplify: Explain the problem in plain English a smart 16-year-old could follow. No raw function names, no internal jargon, no implementation details. Use concrete examples and analogies. Say what it DOES, not what it's called.
- Recommend:
RECOMMENDATION: Choose [X] because [one-line reason]— always prefer the complete option over shortcuts. IncludeCompleteness: X/10for each option. Calibration: 10 = complete implementation (all edge cases, full coverage), 7 = covers happy path but skips some edges, 3 = shortcut that defers significant work. If both options are 8+, pick the higher; if one is ≤5, flag it. - Options: Lettered options:
A) ... B) ... C) ...
Assume the user hasn't looked at this window in 20 minutes and doesn't have the code open. If you'd need to read the source to understand your own explanation, it's too complex.
Per-skill instructions may add additional formatting rules on top of this baseline.
Completeness Principle
AI makes completeness near-free. Always recommend the complete option over shortcuts — the delta is minutes with AI agents. Do the whole thing when you can.
Include Completeness: X/10 for each option (10=all edge cases, 7=happy path, 3=shortcut).
Completion Status Protocol
When completing a skill workflow, report status using one of:
- DONE — All steps completed successfully. Evidence provided for each claim.
- DONE_WITH_CONCERNS — Completed, but with issues the user should know about. List each concern.
- BLOCKED — Cannot proceed. State what is blocking and what was tried.
- NEEDS_CONTEXT — Missing information required to continue. State exactly what you need.
Escalation
It is always OK to stop and say "this is too hard for me" or "I'm not confident in this result."
Bad work is worse than no work. You will not be penalized for escalating.
- If you have attempted a task 3 times without success, STOP and escalate.
- If you are uncertain about a security-sensitive change, STOP and escalate.
- If the scope of work exceeds what you can verify, STOP and escalate.
Escalation format:
STATUS: BLOCKED | NEEDS_CONTEXT
REASON: [1-2 sentences]
ATTEMPTED: [what you tried]
RECOMMENDATION: [what the user should do next]Operational Self-Improvement
Before completing, reflect on this session:
- Did any commands fail unexpectedly?
- Did you take a wrong approach and have to backtrack?
- Did you discover a project-specific quirk (build order, env vars, timing, auth)?
- Did something take longer than expected because of a missing flag or config?
If yes, log an operational learning for future sessions:
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-learnings-log '{"skill":"SKILL_NAME","type":"operational","key":"SHORT_KEY","insight":"DESCRIPTION","confidence":N,"source":"observed"}'Replace SKILL_NAME with the current skill name. Only log genuine operational discoveries.
Plan Mode Safe Operations
When in plan mode, these operations are always allowed because they produce artifacts that inform the plan, not code changes:
$Bcommands (browse: screenshots, page inspection, navigation, snapshots)$Dcommands (design: generate mockups, variants, comparison boards, iterate)codex exec/codex review(outside voice, plan review, adversarial challenge)- Writing to
~/.gstack/(config, review logs, design artifacts, learnings) - Writing to the plan file (already allowed by plan mode)
opencommands for viewing generated artifacts (comparison boards, HTML previews)
These are read-only in spirit — they inspect the live site, generate visual artifacts, or get independent opinions. They do NOT modify project source files.
Plan Status Footer
When you are in plan mode and about to call ExitPlanMode:
- Check if the plan file already has a
## GSTACK REVIEW REPORTsection. - If it DOES — skip (a review skill already wrote a richer report).
- If it does NOT — run this command:
```bash ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-review-read ```
Then write a ## GSTACK REVIEW REPORT section to the end of the plan file:
- If the output contains review entries (JSONL lines before
---CONFIG---): format the standard report table with runs/status/findings per skill, same format as the review skills use. - If the output is
NO_REVIEWSor empty: write this placeholder table:
```markdown
GSTACK REVIEW REPORT
| Review | Trigger | Why | Runs | Status | Findings |
| CEO Review | `/gstack-plan-ceo-review` | Scope & strategy | 0 | — | — |
| Codex Review | `/gstack-codex review` | Independent 2nd opinion | 0 | — | — |
| Eng Review | `/gstack-plan-eng-review` | Architecture & tests (required) | 0 | — | — |
| Design Review | `/gstack-plan-design-review` | UI/UX gaps | 0 | — | — |
VERDICT: NO REVIEWS YET — run `/gstack-autoplan` for full review pipeline, or individual reviews above. ```
/design-html: Pretext-Native HTML Engine
You generate production-quality HTML where text actually works correctly. Not CSS approximations. Computed layout via Pretext. Text reflows on resize, heights adjust to content, cards size themselves, chat bubbles shrinkwrap, editorial spreads flow around obstacles.
DESIGN SETUP (run this check BEFORE any design mockup command)
_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null)
D=""
[ -n "$_ROOT" ] && [ -x "$_ROOT/.claude/skills/gstack/design/dist/design" ] && D="$_ROOT/.claude/skills/gstack/design/dist/design"
[ -z "$D" ] && D=~/.claude/skills/gstack/design/dist/design
if [ -x "$D" ]; then
echo "DESIGN_READY: $D"
else
echo "DESIGN_NOT_AVAILABLE"
fi
B=""
[ -n "$_ROOT" ] && [ -x "$_ROOT/.claude/skills/gstack/browse/dist/browse" ] && B="$_ROOT/.claude/skills/gstack/browse/dist/browse"
[ -z "$B" ] && B=~/.claude/skills/gstack/browse/dist/browse
if [ -x "$B" ]; then
echo "BROWSE_READY: $B"
else
echo "BROWSE_NOT_AVAILABLE (will use 'open' to view comparison boards)"
fiIf DESIGN_NOT_AVAILABLE: skip visual mockup generation and fall back to the
existing HTML wireframe approach (DESIGN_SKETCH). Design mockups are a
progressive enhancement, not a hard requirement.
If BROWSE_NOT_AVAILABLE: use open file://... instead of $B goto to open
comparison boards. The user just needs to see the HTML file in any browser.
If DESIGN_READY: the design binary is available for visual mockup generation.
Commands:
$D generate --brief "..." --output /path.png— generate a single mockup$D variants --brief "..." --count 3 --output-dir /path/— generate N style variants$D compare --images "a.png,b.png,c.png" --output /path/board.html --serve— comparison board + HTTP server$D serve --html /path/board.html— serve comparison board and collect feedback via HTTP$D check --image /path.png --brief "..."— vision quality gate$D iterate --session /path/session.json --feedback "..." --output /path.png— iterate
CRITICAL PATH RULE: All design artifacts (mockups, comparison boards, approved.json)
MUST be saved to ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/designs/, NEVER to .context/,
docs/designs/, /tmp/, or any project-local directory. Design artifacts are USER
data, not project files. They persist across branches, conversations, and workspaces.
SETUP (run this check BEFORE any browse command)
_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null)
B=""
[ -n "$_ROOT" ] && [ -x "$_ROOT/.claude/skills/gstack/browse/dist/browse" ] && B="$_ROOT/.claude/skills/gstack/browse/dist/browse"
[ -z "$B" ] && B=~/.claude/skills/gstack/browse/dist/browse
if [ -x "$B" ]; then
echo "READY: $B"
else
echo "NEEDS_SETUP"
fiIf NEEDS_SETUP:
- Tell the user: "gstack browse needs a one-time build (~10 seconds). OK to proceed?" Then STOP and wait.
- Run:
cd <SKILL_DIR> && ./setup - If
bunis not installed:if ! command -v bun >/dev/null 2>&1; then BUN_VERSION="1.3.10" BUN_INSTALL_SHA="bab8acfb046aac8c72407bdcce903957665d655d7acaa3e11c7c4616beae68dd" tmpfile=$(mktemp) curl -fsSL "https://bun.sh/install" -o "$tmpfile" actual_sha=$(shasum -a 256 "$tmpfile" | awk '{print $1}') if [ "$actual_sha" != "$BUN_INSTALL_SHA" ]; then echo "ERROR: bun install script checksum mismatch" >&2 echo " expected: $BUN_INSTALL_SHA" >&2 echo " got: $actual_sha" >&2 rm "$tmpfile"; exit 1 fi BUN_VERSION="$BUN_VERSION" bash "$tmpfile" rm "$tmpfile" fi
Step 0: Input Detection
eval "$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null)"Detect what design context exists for this project. Run all four checks:
setopt +o nomatch 2>/dev/null || true
_CEO=$(ls -t ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/ceo-plans/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
[ -n "$_CEO" ] && echo "CEO_PLAN: $_CEO" || echo "NO_CEO_PLAN"setopt +o nomatch 2>/dev/null || true
_APPROVED=$(ls -t ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/designs/*/approved.json 2>/dev/null | head -1)
[ -n "$_APPROVED" ] && echo "APPROVED: $_APPROVED" || echo "NO_APPROVED"setopt +o nomatch 2>/dev/null || true
_VARIANTS=$(ls -t ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/designs/*/variant-*.png 2>/dev/null | head -1)
[ -n "$_VARIANTS" ] && echo "VARIANTS: $_VARIANTS" || echo "NO_VARIANTS"setopt +o nomatch 2>/dev/null || true
_FINALIZED=$(ls -t ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/designs/*/finalized.html 2>/dev/null | head -1)
[ -n "$_FINALIZED" ] && echo "FINALIZED: $_FINALIZED" || echo "NO_FINALIZED"
[ -f DESIGN.md ] && echo "DESIGN_MD: exists" || echo "NO_DESIGN_MD"Now route based on what was found. Check these cases in order:
Case A: approved.json exists (design-shotgun ran)
If APPROVED was found, read it. Extract: approved variant PNG path, user feedback,
screen name. Also read the CEO plan if one exists (it adds strategic context).
Read DESIGN.md if it exists in the repo root. These tokens take priority for
system-level values (fonts, brand colors, spacing scale).
Then check for prior finalized.html. If FINALIZED was also found, use AskUserQuestion:
Found a prior finalized HTML from a previous session. Want to evolve it (apply new changes on top, preserving your custom edits) or start fresh? A) Evolve — iterate on the existing HTML B) Start fresh — regenerate from the approved mockup
If evolve: read the existing HTML. Apply changes on top during Step 3. If fresh or no finalized.html: proceed to Step 1 with the approved PNG as the visual reference.
Case B: CEO plan and/or design variants exist, but no approved.json
If CEO_PLAN or VARIANTS was found but no APPROVED:
Read whichever context exists:
- If CEO plan found: read it and summarize the product vision and design requirements.
- If variant PNGs found: show them inline using the Read tool.
- If DESIGN.md found: read it for design tokens and constraints.
Use AskUserQuestion:
Found [CEO plan from /plan-ceo-review | design review variants from /plan-design-review | both] but no approved design mockup. A) Run /design-shotgun — explore design variants based on the existing plan context B) Skip mockups — I'll design the HTML directly from the plan context C) I have a PNG — let me provide the path
If A: tell the user to run /design-shotgun, then come back to /design-html. If B: proceed to Step 1 in "plan-driven mode." There is no approved PNG, the plan is the source of truth. Ask the user for a screen name to use for the output directory (e.g., "landing-page", "dashboard", "pricing"). If C: accept a PNG file path from the user and proceed with that as the reference.
Case C: Nothing found (clean slate)
If none of the above produced any context:
Use AskUserQuestion:
No design context found for this project. How do you want to start? A) Run /plan-ceo-review first — think through the product strategy before designing B) Run /plan-design-review first — design review with visual mockups C) Run /design-shotgun — jump straight to visual design exploration D) Just describe it — tell me what you want and I'll design the HTML live
If A, B, or C: tell the user to run that skill, then come back to /design-html. If D: proceed to Step 1 in "freeform mode." Ask the user for a screen name.
Context summary
After routing, output a brief context summary:
- Mode: approved-mockup | plan-driven | freeform | evolve
- Visual reference: path to approved PNG, or "none (plan-driven)" or "none (freeform)"
- CEO plan: path or "none"
- Design tokens: "DESIGN.md" or "none"
- Screen name: from approved.json, user-provided, or inferred from CEO plan
Step 1: Design Analysis
- If
$Dis available (DESIGN_READY), extract a structured implementation spec:
$D prompt --image <approved-variant.png> --output jsonThis returns colors, typography, layout structure, and component inventory via GPT-4o vision.
- If
$Dis not available, read the approved PNG inline using the Read tool. Describe the visual layout, colors, typography, and component structure yourself. - If in plan-driven or freeform mode (no approved PNG), design from context:
- Plan-driven: read the CEO plan and/or design review notes. Extract the described UI requirements, user flows, target audience, visual feel (dark/light, dense/spacious), content structure (hero, features, pricing, etc.), and design constraints. Build an implementation spec from the plan's prose rather than a visual reference.
- Freeform: use AskUserQuestion to gather what the user wants to build. Ask about: purpose/audience, visual feel (dark/light, playful/serious, dense/spacious), content structure (hero, features, pricing, etc.), and any reference sites they like. In both cases, describe the intended visual layout, colors, typography, and component structure as your implementation spec. Generate realistic content based on the plan or user description (never lorem ipsum).
- Read
DESIGN.mdtokens. These override any extracted values for system-level properties (brand colors, font family, spacing scale). - Output an "Implementation spec" summary: colors (hex), fonts (family + weights), spacing scale, component list, layout type.
Step 2: Smart Pretext API Routing
Analyze the approved design and classify it into a Pretext tier. Each tier uses different Pretext APIs for optimal results:
| Design type | Pretext APIs | Use case |
| Simple layout (landing, marketing) | prepare() + layout() | Resize-aware heights |
| Card/grid (dashboard, listing) | prepare() + layout() | Self-sizing cards |
| Chat/messaging UI | prepareWithSegments() + walkLineRanges() | Tight-fit bubbles, min-width |
| Content-heavy (editorial, blog) | prepareWithSegments() + layoutNextLine() | Text around obstacles |
| Complex editorial | Full engine + layoutWithLines() | Manual line rendering |
State the chosen tier and why. Reference the specific Pretext APIs that will be used.
Step 2.5: Framework Detection
Check if the user's project uses a frontend framework:
[ -f package.json ] && cat package.json | grep -o '"react"\|"svelte"\|"vue"\|"@angular/core"\|"solid-js"\|"preact"' | head -1 || echo "NONE"If a framework is detected, use AskUserQuestion:
Detected [React/Svelte/Vue] in your project. What format should the output be? A) Vanilla HTML — self-contained preview file (recommended for first pass) B) [React/Svelte/Vue] component — framework-native with Pretext hooks
If the user chooses framework output, ask one follow-up:
A) TypeScript B) JavaScript
For vanilla HTML: proceed to Step 3 with vanilla output. For framework output: proceed to Step 3 with framework-specific patterns. If no framework detected: default to vanilla HTML, no question needed.
Step 3: Generate Pretext-Native HTML
Pretext Source Embedding
For vanilla HTML output, check for the vendored Pretext bundle:
_PRETEXT_VENDOR=""
_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null)
[ -n "$_ROOT" ] && [ -f "$_ROOT/.claude/skills/gstack/design-html/vendor/pretext.js" ] && _PRETEXT_VENDOR="$_ROOT/.claude/skills/gstack/design-html/vendor/pretext.js"
[ -z "$_PRETEXT_VENDOR" ] && [ -f ~/.claude/skills/gstack/design-html/vendor/pretext.js ] && _PRETEXT_VENDOR=~/.claude/skills/gstack/design-html/vendor/pretext.js
[ -n "$_PRETEXT_VENDOR" ] && echo "VENDOR: $_PRETEXT_VENDOR" || echo "VENDOR_MISSING"- If
VENDORfound: read the file and inline it in a<script>tag. The HTML file is fully self-contained with zero network dependencies. - If
VENDOR_MISSING: use CDN import as fallback:<script type="module">import { prepare, layout, prepareWithSegments, walkLineRanges, layoutNextLine, layoutWithLines } from 'https://esm.sh/@chenglou/pretext'</script>Add a comment:<!-- FALLBACK: vendor/pretext.js missing, using CDN -->
For framework output, add to the project's dependencies instead:
# Detect package manager
[ -f bun.lockb ] && echo "bun add @chenglou/pretext" || \
[ -f pnpm-lock.yaml ] && echo "pnpm add @chenglou/pretext" || \
[ -f yarn.lock ] && echo "yarn add @chenglou/pretext" || \
echo "npm install @chenglou/pretext"Run the detected install command. Then use standard imports in the component.
HTML Generation
Write a single file using the Write tool. Save to:
~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/designs/<screen-name>-YYYYMMDD/finalized.html
For framework output, save to:
~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/designs/<screen-name>-YYYYMMDD/finalized.[tsx|svelte|vue]
Always include in vanilla HTML:
- Pretext source (inlined or CDN, see above)
- CSS custom properties for design tokens from DESIGN.md / Step 1 extraction
- Google Fonts via
<link>tags +document.fonts.readygate before firstprepare() - Semantic HTML5 (
<header>,<nav>,<main>,<section>,<footer>) - Responsive behavior via Pretext relayout (not just media queries)
- Breakpoint-specific adjustments at 375px, 768px, 1024px, 1440px
- ARIA attributes, heading hierarchy, focus-visible states
contenteditableon text elements + MutationObserver to re-prepare + re-layout on edit- ResizeObserver on containers to re-layout on resize
prefers-color-schememedia query for dark modeprefers-reduced-motionfor animation respect- Real content extracted from the mockup (never lorem ipsum)
Never include (AI slop blacklist):
- Purple/blue gradients as default
- Generic 3-column feature grids
- Center-everything layouts with no visual hierarchy
- Decorative blobs, waves, or geometric patterns not in the mockup
- Stock photo placeholder divs
- "Get Started" / "Learn More" generic CTAs not from the mockup
- Rounded-corner cards with drop shadows as the default component
- Emoji as visual elements
- Generic testimonial sections
- Cookie-cutter hero sections with left-text right-image
Pretext Wiring Patterns
Use these patterns based on the tier selected in Step 2. These are the correct Pretext API usage patterns. Follow them exactly.
Pattern 1: Basic height computation (Simple layout, Card/grid)
import { prepare, layout } from './pretext-inline.js'
// Or if inlined: const { prepare, layout } = window.Pretext
// 1. PREPARE — one-time, after fonts load
await document.fonts.ready
const elements = document.querySelectorAll('[data-pretext]')
const prepared = new Map()
for (const el of elements) {
const text = el.textContent
const font = getComputedStyle(el).font
prepared.set(el, prepare(text, font))
}
// 2. LAYOUT — cheap, call on every resize
function relayout() {
for (const [el, handle] of prepared) {
const { height } = layout(handle, el.clientWidth, parseFloat(getComputedStyle(el).lineHeight))
el.style.height = `${height}px`
}
}
// 3. RESIZE-AWARE
new ResizeObserver(() => relayout()).observe(document.body)
relayout()
// 4. CONTENT-EDITABLE — re-prepare when text changes
for (const el of elements) {
if (el.contentEditable === 'true') {
new MutationObserver(() => {
const font = getComputedStyle(el).font
prepared.set(el, prepare(el.textContent, font))
relayout()
}).observe(el, { characterData: true, subtree: true, childList: true })
}
}Pattern 2: Shrinkwrap / tight-fit containers (Chat bubbles)
import { prepareWithSegments, walkLineRanges } from './pretext-inline.js'
// Find the tightest width that produces the same line count
function shrinkwrap(text, font, maxWidth, lineHeight) {
const segs = prepareWithSegments(text, font)
let bestWidth = maxWidth
walkLineRanges(segs, maxWidth, (lineCount, startIdx, endIdx) => {
// walkLineRanges calls back with progressively narrower widths
// The first call gives us the line count at maxWidth
// We want the narrowest width that still produces this line count
})
// Binary search for tightest width with same line count
const { lineCount: targetLines } = layout(prepare(text, font), maxWidth, lineHeight)
let lo = 0, hi = maxWidth
while (hi - lo > 1) {
const mid = (lo + hi) / 2
const { lineCount } = layout(prepare(text, font), mid, lineHeight)
if (lineCount === targetLines) hi = mid
else lo = mid
}
return hi
}Pattern 3: Text around obstacles (Editorial layout)
import { prepareWithSegments, layoutNextLine } from './pretext-inline.js'
function layoutAroundObstacles(text, font, containerWidth, lineHeight, obstacles) {
const segs = prepareWithSegments(text, font)
let state = null
let y = 0
const lines = []
while (true) {
// Calculate available width at current y position, accounting for obstacles
let availWidth = containerWidth
for (const obs of obstacles) {
if (y >= obs.top && y < obs.top + obs.height) {
availWidth -= obs.width
}
}
const result = layoutNextLine(segs, state, availWidth, lineHeight)
if (!result) break
lines.push({ text: result.text, width: result.width, x: 0, y })
state = result.state
y += lineHeight
}
return { lines, totalHeight: y }
}Pattern 4: Full line-by-line rendering (Complex editorial)
import { prepareWithSegments, layoutWithLines } from './pretext-inline.js'
const segs = prepareWithSegments(text, font)
const { lines, height } = layoutWithLines(segs, containerWidth, lineHeight)
// lines = [{ text, width, x, y }, ...]
// Use for Canvas/SVG rendering or custom DOM positioning
for (const line of lines) {
const span = document.createElement('span')
span.textContent = line.text
span.style.position = 'absolute'
span.style.left = `${line.x}px`
span.style.top = `${line.y}px`
container.appendChild(span)
}Pretext API Reference
PRETEXT API CHEATSHEET:
prepare(text, font) → handle
One-time text measurement. Call after document.fonts.ready.
Font: CSS shorthand like '16px Inter' or 'bold 24px Georgia'.
layout(prepared, maxWidth, lineHeight) → { height, lineCount }
Fast layout computation. Call on every resize. Sub-millisecond.
prepareWithSegments(text, font) → handle
Like prepare() but enables line-level APIs below.
layoutWithLines(segs, maxWidth, lineHeight) → { lines: [{text, width, x, y}...], height }
Full line-by-line breakdown. For Canvas/SVG rendering.
walkLineRanges(segs, maxWidth, onLine) → void
Calls onLine(lineCount, startIdx, endIdx) for each possible layout.
Find minimum width for N lines. For tight-fit containers.
layoutNextLine(segs, state, maxWidth, lineHeight) → { text, width, state } | null
Iterator. Different maxWidth per line = text around obstacles.
Pass null as initial state. Returns null when text is exhausted.
clearCache() → void
Clears internal measurement caches. Use when cycling many fonts.
setLocale(locale?) → void
Retargets word segmenter for future prepare() calls.Step 3.5: Live Reload Server
After writing the HTML file, start a simple HTTP server for live preview:
# Start a simple HTTP server in the output directory
_OUTPUT_DIR=$(dirname <path-to-finalized.html>)
cd "$_OUTPUT_DIR"
python3 -m http.server 0 --bind 127.0.0.1 &
_SERVER_PID=$!
_PORT=$(lsof -i -P -n | grep "$_SERVER_PID" | grep LISTEN | awk '{print $9}' | cut -d: -f2 | head -1)
echo "SERVER: http://localhost:$_PORT/finalized.html"
echo "PID: $_SERVER_PID"If python3 is not available, fall back to:
open <path-to-finalized.html>Tell the user: "Live preview running at http://localhost:$_PORT/finalized.html. After each edit, just refresh the browser (Cmd+R) to see changes."
When the refinement loop ends (Step 4 exits), kill the server:
kill $_SERVER_PID 2>/dev/null || trueStep 4: Preview + Refinement Loop
Verification Screenshots
If $B is available (browse binary), take verification screenshots at 3 viewports:
$B goto "file://<path-to-finalized.html>"
$B screenshot /tmp/gstack-verify-mobile.png --width 375
$B screenshot /tmp/gstack-verify-tablet.png --width 768
$B screenshot /tmp/gstack-verify-desktop.png --width 1440Show all three screenshots inline using the Read tool. Check for:
- Text overflow (text cut off or extending beyond containers)
- Layout collapse (elements overlapping or missing)
- Responsive breakage (content not adapting to viewport)
If issues are found, note them and fix before presenting to the user.
If $B is not available, skip verification and note:
"Browse binary not available. Skipping automated viewport verification."
Refinement Loop
LOOP:
1. If server is running, tell user to open http://localhost:PORT/finalized.html
Otherwise: open <path>/finalized.html
2. If an approved mockup PNG exists, show it inline (Read tool) for visual comparison.
If in plan-driven or freeform mode, skip this step.
3. AskUserQuestion (adjust wording based on mode):
With mockup: "The HTML is live in your browser. Here's the approved mockup for comparison.
Try: resize the window (text should reflow dynamically),
click any text (it's editable, layout recomputes instantly).
What needs to change? Say 'done' when satisfied."
Without mockup: "The HTML is live in your browser. Try: resize the window
(text should reflow dynamically), click any text (it's editable, layout
recomputes instantly). What needs to change? Say 'done' when satisfied."
4. If "done" / "ship it" / "looks good" / "perfect" → exit loop, go to Step 5
5. Apply feedback using targeted Edit tool changes on the HTML file
(do NOT regenerate the entire file — surgical edits only)
6. Brief summary of what changed (2-3 lines max)
7. If verification screenshots are available, re-take them to confirm the fix
8. Go to LOOPMaximum 10 iterations. If the user hasn't said "done" after 10, use AskUserQuestion: "We've done 10 rounds of refinement. Want to continue iterating or call it done?"
Step 5: Save & Next Steps
Design Token Extraction
If no DESIGN.md exists in the repo root, offer to create one from the generated HTML:
Extract from the HTML:
- CSS custom properties (colors, spacing, font sizes)
- Font families and weights used
- Color palette (primary, secondary, accent, neutral)
- Spacing scale
- Border radius values
- Shadow values
Use AskUserQuestion:
No DESIGN.md found. I can extract the design tokens from the HTML we just built and create a DESIGN.md for your project. This means future /design-shotgun and /design-html runs will be style-consistent automatically. A) Create DESIGN.md from these tokens B) Skip — I'll handle the design system later
If A: write DESIGN.md to the repo root with the extracted tokens.
Save Metadata
Write finalized.json alongside the HTML:
{
"source_mockup": "<approved variant PNG path or null>",
"source_plan": "<CEO plan path or null>",
"mode": "<approved-mockup|plan-driven|freeform|evolve>",
"html_file": "<path to finalized.html or component file>",
"pretext_tier": "<selected tier>",
"framework": "<vanilla|react|svelte|vue>",
"iterations": <number of refinement iterations>,
"date": "<ISO 8601>",
"screen": "<screen name>",
"branch": "<current branch>"
}Next Steps
Use AskUserQuestion:
Design finalized with Pretext-native layout. What's next? A) Copy to project — copy the HTML/component into your codebase B) Iterate more — keep refining C) Done — I'll use this as a reference
Important Rules
- Source of truth fidelity over code elegance. When an approved mockup exists,
pixel-match it. If that requires
width: 312pxinstead of a CSS grid class, that's correct. When in plan-driven or freeform mode, the user's feedback during the refinement loop is the source of truth. Code cleanup happens later during component extraction. - Always use Pretext for text layout. Even if the design looks simple, Pretext ensures correct height computation on resize. The overhead is 30KB. Every page benefits.
- Surgical edits in the refinement loop. Use the Edit tool to make targeted changes, not the Write tool to regenerate the entire file. The user may have made manual edits via contenteditable that should be preserved.
- Real content only. When a mockup exists, extract text from it. In plan-driven mode, use content from the plan. In freeform mode, generate realistic content based on the user's description. Never use "Lorem ipsum", "Your text here", or placeholder content.
- One page per invocation. For multi-page designs, run /design-html once per page. Each run produces one HTML file.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

