runbook
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate or update a comprehensive operational runbook (docs/runbook/) tailored to the project's size and complexity
- Reads credentials
25 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- seayniclabs/homelab-infra-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AsiaOstrich/EngramGraphtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jocarrd/crux-agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Firzus/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standardstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use incident, discover and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
JkudjoSkillincident
Production incident response — structured triage, hypothesis tree, safe remediation, incident record
Also in 4 projects that use this
anombyte93Skilldiscover
Phase 1 of the prd-taskmaster pipeline: brainstorm-driven discovery. Delegates to superpowers:brainstorming in Interactive Mode (one adaptive question at a time), or self-brainstorms in Autonomous Mode when no user is present. Intercepts before the brainstorming chain hands off to writing-plans — this skill owns the exit. Extracts constraints, calibrates scale (Solo / Team / Enterprise), and advances the pipeline to GENERATE.
Also in 4 projects that use this
asterkinSkilladr
Create Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following project standards. Guides template usage, process, and best practices for documenting architecturally significant decisions.
Also in 5 projects that use this
OpenAISkillobservability
Vercel Observability expert guidance — Drains (logs, traces, speed insights, web analytics), Web Analytics, Speed Insights, runtime logs, custom events, OpenTelemetry integration, and monitoring dashboards. Use when instrumenting, debugging, or optimizing application performance and user experience on Vercel.
Also in 4 projects that use this
SentrySkille2e
Run E2E tests for Sentry JavaScript SDK test applications
Also in 3 projects that use this
OpenAISkillaudit
Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions25 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 25
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- suboss87/FDEOps★ 940same name
- sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flow★ 192same name
- sd0xdev/sd0x-harness★ 192same name
- AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards★ 84same name
- NotHarshhaa/devops-skills★ 8same name
- AsiaOstrich/EngramGraph★ 4same name
- Firzus/agent-skills★ 4same name
- jocarrd/crux-agents★ 4same name
- gmanch94/claude-code-aidlc-template★ 2same name
15 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- customer-facing-specSkill
- dispatchSkill
- explain-step-by-stepSkill
- features-roadmapSkill
- markdown-to-formal-docSkill
- md-to-docxSkill
- plan-to-project-treeSkill
- review-planSkill
- writing-clearly-and-conciselySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 22 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Before launching any agents, check if a docs/runbook/ directory already exists.
- Distinctive: line 29
Wait for all 3 agents to complete before proceeding.
- Distinctive: line 64
Use actual values from the codebase: real file paths, real env var names, real port numbers, real commands
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 22 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Generate Operational Runbook
Analyze the codebase in depth and produce a docs/runbook/ directory with operational reference documentation. Scales from a single consolidated doc for small projects up to 10 separate pages for large monorepos. Upserts — creates new or updates existing runbook content.
Instructions
0. Check for existing runbook
Before launching any agents, check if a docs/runbook/ directory already exists.
- If it exists: Read
docs/runbook/README.mdand skim the other files. Use the existing structure, formatting, and still-valid content as a starting point. The explore agents should focus on finding new or changed information. When writing, preserve valid existing content, update stale sections, and add new discoveries — don't start from scratch. - If it doesn't exist: Proceed normally from step 1.
1. Launch 3 parallel explore agents for codebase understanding
Launch these 3 agents simultaneously using the Agent tool with subagent_type: "Explore" and run_in_background: true. Each should do a thorough exploration of its assigned area:
- Architecture & Stack — Read README, CLAUDE.md, package.json/go.mod/pyproject.toml/Cargo.toml, monorepo config (turbo.json, pnpm-workspace.yaml, nx.json, Cargo workspace), and source directory structure. Identify all services/apps/packages, their runtimes, how they communicate, database setup, auth system, key frameworks and libraries with versions.
- Operations & Infrastructure — Explore Dockerfiles, docker-compose files, CI/CD workflows (.github/workflows/, .gitlab-ci.yml, Jenkinsfile), deployment configs (render.yaml, fly.toml, vercel.json, k8s manifests, Pulumi/Terraform), scripts/ directory, environment variable templates (.env.example), and observability setup (logging, metrics, tracing, error tracking).
- Development & Testing — Explore dev scripts, test configurations (vitest/jest/pytest/go test), E2E test setup (Playwright/Cypress), test fixtures, seed scripts, linting config, hot-reload setup, and any existing docs/ or guides/. Also check for security patterns (auth guards, middleware, compliance requirements).
Wait for all 3 agents to complete before proceeding.
2. Assess project scope and choose document structure
Based on exploration results, assess the project's complexity:
Small project (single app, simple deployment, 1 database, no CI/CD or minimal):
- Produce 1-2 files: a single
README.mdrunbook covering all topics in consolidated sections, plus optionally atroubleshooting.mdif there's enough to say.
Medium project (multiple packages or a backend+frontend split, CI/CD, some infrastructure, testing):
- Produce 3-6 files: separate pages for the topics that have substantial content. Combine thin topics into a single page (e.g., merge "database" into "architecture" if there are only a few tables, merge "security" into "deployment" if there's no compliance framework).
Large project (monorepo with multiple services, complex infrastructure, multiple deployment targets, compliance/security requirements, extensive testing):
- Produce up to 10 files: one per topic where each has enough depth to warrant its own page.
The candidate topics (include only those relevant to the project):
| Topic | Include When |
| Architecture | Always — service map, data flow, key abstractions |
| Stack & Dependencies | Multiple languages/runtimes, or 20+ key dependencies |
| Local Development | Non-trivial setup (Docker, multiple services, env vars) |
| Database Operations | Migrations, multiple DBs, schema management |
| Deployment | CI/CD pipelines, multiple environments, container builds |
| Observability | Logging, metrics, tracing, error tracking configured |
| Testing | Multiple test types (unit, integration, E2E) |
| Troubleshooting | Always — common issues and fixes |
| Security & Compliance | Auth system, HIPAA/SOC2/GDPR, data scoping, guards |
| Email / Notifications | Transactional email, push notifications, webhooks |
3. Write the runbook
For each file, write content that goes deeper than the README. The audience is an engineer who needs to develop, deploy, debug, or maintain the system.
Content guidelines:
- Use actual values from the codebase: real file paths, real env var names, real port numbers, real commands
- Include tables for structured data (ports, env vars, services, commands)
- Include code blocks for commands and config examples
- Include diagrams (ASCII art) for service maps and request flows where helpful
- Reference specific source files that an engineer would need to read
- For troubleshooting: structure as Symptom → Cause → Fix
- Never include secret values — only variable names
README.md must always include:
- Table of contents linking to all other runbook pages
- Quick-reference table: ports, key commands, health check endpoints
4. Report completion
Tell the user:
- How many files were created/updated
- The document structure chosen and why (small/medium/large)
- A brief summary of the key operational details captured
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

