seo-content-strategy
Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
SEO content strategy assistant for any website or brand. Use when asked to plan, prioritize, or update a content strategy — including mapping blog post ideas to content types, prioritizing posts by funnel stage and keyword intent, auditing a content plan, identifying content gaps, or making strategic decisions about what to write next. Also use when asked about SEO goals, competitor landscape, content clusters, or publishing cadence. Trigger phrases include "content strategy", "what should we write next", "content plan", "SEO roadmap", "content audit", "content gap analysis", "editorial calendar".
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- parsakhaz/seo-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- scayver/marketing-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- ronaldships/foundvia-discoverytheir own version, first seen Oct 6, 2026
- brandenburgpaul/seo-content-strategytheir own version, first seen Feb 13, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- ronaldships/foundvia-discovery★ 29same name
- scayver/marketing-skills★ 8same name
- parsakhaz/seo-skills★ 2same name
- brandenburgpaul/seo-content-strategy★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- anti-slopSkill
- anti-spamSkill
- careful-marketerSkill
- cro-auditSkill
- keyword-researchSkill
- landing-page-designerSkill
- linkedin-profile-scraperSkill
- listicle-blog-post-writerSkill
- setting-up-mcpsSkill
- short-form-video-scriptsSkill
- skill-auto-improveSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- social-media-managerSkill
- web-designerSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
13
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Before starting, gather these inputs from the user (ask only for what's missing):
- Distinctive: line 23
If any of these are unknown, note it and proceed with what's available.
- Distinctive: line 35
When prioritizing what to write next, score each post across four criteria:
- Distinctive: line 49
Consider: What does this audience struggle with daily?
- Distinctive: line 79
Not every content type applies to every business.
- Distinctive: line 144
Variety rule: Never publish 3+ posts of the same content type in a row
- Distinctive: line 217
Check funnel balance -- overweighted on top-of-funnel?
- Distinctive: line 218
Check cluster coverage -- any clusters being ignored?
- Distinctive: line 219
Check content type variety in the schedule
- Distinctive: line 223
Check help docs/FAQs for unanswered troubleshooting searches
- Distinctive: line 224
Check existing video content for unrepurposed eligible videos
- Distinctive: line 225
Check competitor sites for keywords they rank for that the brand doesn't
- Distinctive: line 226
Check "People Also Ask" for adjacent intent not yet covered
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
SEO Content Strategy
Strategic SEO content planning assistant. Helps plan, prioritize, and evolve a content strategy with the goal of driving conversions through organic search and LLM citations.
Important
Before starting, gather these inputs from the user (ask only for what's missing):
- Brand name and what it does (product, service, content, etc.)
- Business type (SaaS, e-commerce, local/service business, personal brand/creator, agency, media/publishing)
- Target audience (ICP)
- Primary conversion goal (signups, purchases, bookings, demos, leads, subscribers, etc.)
- Domain state (DR, current organic traffic, existing content -- even rough estimates help)
- Competitors (top 3-5 in business AND in search)
- Existing content assets (YouTube, podcast, help docs, blog, newsletter, social, etc.)
If any of these are unknown, note it and proceed with what's available. Label assumptions.
Content Strategy North Star
Attack mid-to-bottom funnel first. Build trust and conversion-oriented content before chasing volume. Earn LLM citations through specific, citable, first-person content.
Content Prioritization Framework
When prioritizing what to write next, score each post across four criteria:
1. Qualified Search Intent (most important)
- Bottom-funnel: Actively evaluating, comparing, or ready to buy/hire/book (comparisons, alternatives, reviews, pricing pages, "near me" searches) -> highest priority
- Mid-funnel: Has a problem and is researching solutions (how-to, roundups, use case guides, buyer's guides) -> medium priority
- Top-funnel: Browsing, learning, or exploring (thought leadership, glossary, general industry posts) -> lower priority, builds authority over time
2. Keyword Opportunity
- High volume + low competition = ideal
- Low volume + very specific intent = still worth doing (troubleshooting, exact error messages, long-tail)
- High volume + high competition = defer until domain authority grows
3. ICP Relevance
- Posts that speak directly to the target audience's pain points rank highest
- Consider: What does this audience struggle with daily? What language do they use?
4. Conversion Probability (varies by business type)
SaaS / Software:
- Highest: "[Brand] vs [Competitor]," "Best [Competitor] Alternatives"
- High: Troubleshooting posts, integration guides
- Medium: How-to posts, use case guides
E-commerce / DTC:
- Highest: Product reviews, "best [product] for [use case]," buyer's guides
- High: Comparison roundups, "[product] vs [product]"
- Medium: How-to/care guides, gift guides
Local / Service Business:
- Highest: "[Service] in [City]," "best [service] near me" pages
- High: Case studies, before/after showcases, FAQ pages
- Medium: How-to guides, industry explainers
Personal Brand / Creator / Agency:
- Highest: Case studies with specific results, service pages
- High: "How to [outcome]" posts targeting buyer pain
- Medium: Thought leadership, frameworks, POV content
Adapt the conversion hierarchy to the business model. The principle is universal: content closest to a buying decision gets published first.
Content Type Guide
Not every content type applies to every business. Select from this menu based on what fits the brand.
Universal (works for any business)
| Content Type | Best For | Funnel Stage |
| How-To Guide | Task-based guides solving a specific problem | Mid |
| Listicle - Roundup | "Best [X] for [Y]" category keywords | Mid |
| Pillar Page | Cluster hub, broad keywords | Top-Mid |
| Video Repurpose | Existing YouTube/video content -> SEO post | Mid |
| Thought Leadership | Brand authority, expert POV content | Top |
| FAQ / Resource Page | Answering common audience questions | Mid-Bottom |
SaaS / Software
| Content Type | Best For | Funnel Stage |
| Comparison (vs) | Buyers evaluating Brand vs a competitor | Bottom |
| Listicle - Alternatives | Capturing competitor churn | Bottom |
| Integration Guide | Developer/automation audience | Mid-Bottom |
| Troubleshooting | Error fixes, frustrated users | Bottom |
| Feature Page | Feature-specific landing pages | Bottom |
| Use Case Guide | Showing the product solving a specific job | Mid |
E-commerce / DTC
| Content Type | Best For | Funnel Stage |
| Product Review / Comparison | "[Product A] vs [Product B]" buyers | Bottom |
| Buyer's Guide | "Best [product] for [audience/use case]" | Mid-Bottom |
| Gift Guide | Seasonal/occasion-based purchase intent | Mid-Bottom |
| Care / Maintenance Guide | Post-purchase value, builds trust | Mid |
Local / Service Business
| Content Type | Best For | Funnel Stage |
| Location Page | "[Service] in [City/Area]" searches | Bottom |
| Case Study / Before-After | Proof of results for local buyers | Bottom |
| Service Page | Specific service offering detail | Bottom |
| Local Guide / Resource | Community authority building | Top-Mid |
Personal Brand / Creator / Agency
| Content Type | Best For | Funnel Stage |
| Case Study | Specific client results with numbers | Bottom |
| Framework / Playbook | Demonstrating expertise, attracting leads | Mid |
| Tool / Stack Review | Audience trusts your recommendations | Mid |
Content Cluster Architecture
Organize all content into 5-8 thematic clusters. Each cluster should:
- Map to a core topic the brand wants to own in search
- Contain 6-12 supporting posts
- Have a pillar page planned (but built AFTER 3+ supporting posts exist)
Cluster planning template:
- Cluster name -- the broad topic
- Pillar keyword -- the high-volume target for the hub page
- Supporting post ideas -- 6-12 specific posts with keywords
- Funnel mix -- ensure each cluster has bottom + mid funnel posts, not just top
Publishing Cadence
- Target: 1-2 posts per week (adjust based on resources)
- Variety rule: Never publish 3+ posts of the same content type in a row
- Priority sequence: Bottom-funnel first, then mid, then top
- Content type rotation: Alternate between comparisons, how-tos, troubleshooting, and roundups
Content Sources (Priority Order)
Repurposing existing assets is always higher ROI than writing from scratch. Audit what the brand already has before planning net-new content.
- Existing video/podcast content -- Highest ROI. Existing media = existing E-E-A-T signals. Repurpose anything relevant to the brand's core topics.
- FAQ and support content -- Help docs, customer questions, sales objections, review site comments. These surface exact-match keyword opportunities.
- Existing long-form content -- Newsletter archives, Substack, Medium, LinkedIn articles. Expand into full SEO posts.
- Published blog posts -- Audit and optimize before writing net-new. Refreshing a post with existing authority often outperforms a brand-new post.
- Customer/client stories -- Testimonials, case studies, before/after results. High E-E-A-T, high conversion.
- Net new -- Write from scratch when no existing asset covers the keyword.
Competitive Content Analysis
Understand who the brand competes with in search (not just in business). Sometimes the real content competitor is an affiliate blog or media site, not a direct business competitor.
For each competitor, document:
| Field | What to Capture |
| Competitor name | Who they are (direct competitor, content competitor, or both) |
| Their positioning | How they frame themselves vs. your brand |
| Your brand's edge | Where you genuinely win (price, experience, niche, location, results) |
| Their content gaps | Keywords they don't rank for that you can own |
| Content angle | How to differentiate your content on overlapping topics |
Key rules:
- Comparison content should be honest. Edge toward your brand where it genuinely wins. Never fabricate weaknesses.
- Direct head-to-head comparison posts (Brand A vs Brand B) work well for SaaS and e-commerce. For service/local businesses, focus on "best [service] in [area]" roundups and case studies instead -- direct competitor callouts can feel adversarial in those verticals.
LLM Citation Strategy
To grow AI citations (Perplexity, ChatGPT, etc.):
- Specific, verifiable claims get cited. "Serves 200+ clients in the Dallas metro" or "Ships to 14 countries" beats "a trusted provider with years of experience."
- Structured data (comparison tables, pricing breakdowns, spec lists, pro/con lists) gets cited heavily -- easy for LLMs to extract
- First-person proof stories get cited -- specific results with numbers ("grew from X to Y in Z months," "reduced cost by 40%")
- Exact-match Q&A content written as users actually type questions converts into AI answer sources
- Troubleshooting / problem-solution content gets cited when users ask AI tools about those specific problems
- Location + service combinations get cited for local intent queries in AI tools
Content Plan Tracking
Recommend this column structure for tracking (Google Sheet, Notion, Airtable, etc.):
Status | Content Type | Topic | Owner | Primary Keyword | SEO Title | URL Slug | Target Publish Date | Date Published | Live URL | Notes
Recommended Status Flow
Backlog -> Keyword Approved -> Outline Done -> Draft In Progress -> Draft Complete -> Scheduled -> Published -> Indexed
How to Use This Skill
When planning new posts
- Gather brand context (or reference what's already known)
- Apply the prioritization framework (intent -> volume -> ICP relevance -> conversion probability)
- Assign a content type from the guide above
- Propose a keyword, SEO title, and URL slug
- Suggest a publish date based on current cadence
When auditing a content plan
- Check funnel balance -- overweighted on top-of-funnel?
- Check cluster coverage -- any clusters being ignored?
- Check content type variety in the schedule
- Flag posts that overlap or risk cannibalizing each other
When identifying content gaps
- Check help docs/FAQs for unanswered troubleshooting searches
- Check existing video content for unrepurposed eligible videos
- Check competitor sites for keywords they rank for that the brand doesn't
- Check "People Also Ask" for adjacent intent not yet covered
When updating the content tracker
- Status updates: move posts through the workflow stages
- New posts: propose full row with all columns filled
- Date changes: flag if cadence is slipping and recommend which posts to prioritize
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
- Publishing 3+ posts of the same content type in a row -- vary the mix
- Writing top-of-funnel before bottom-funnel is covered -- earn rankings in buying mode first
- Swapping competitor names across articles without changing the angle -- each comparison needs a distinct hook
- Vague claims -- "Best tool ever" is not a ranking or citation strategy. Specific facts are.
- Ignoring help docs/FAQs -- exact-match search queries live there
- Writing pillar pages before supporting posts exist -- build the cluster first
- Chasing high-volume keywords on a low-authority domain -- match ambition to current DR
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

