agentleFS
rainoftimerainoftime/pl-skills/constant-propagation-pass/SKILL.md

constant-propagation-pass

Skill17 starsChanged 9 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Implements constant propagation optimization. Use when: (1) Building

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use join (∩) at control flow merge points

    line 59
  2. Distinctive:

    Consider arrays and pointers as killing definitions

    line 61

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Constant Propagation Pass

Implements dataflow constant propagation optimization.

When to Use

  • Building compilers
  • Learning program analysis
  • Implementing optimizations
  • Static program analysis

What This Skill Does

  1. Collects constants - Tracks known values through the program
  2. Propagates - Forward dataflow analysis with lattice operations
  3. Optimizes - Replaces variables/expressions with constant values
  4. Handles conditionals - Uses conditional branches to refine analysis

Key Concepts

ConceptDescription
LatticePartial order: ⊥ (uninitialized) < constants < ⊤ (unknown/NAC)
Transfer functionHow statements transform lattice values
JoinLattice meet at control flow merge points (∩ for constants)
Worklist algorithmIterative fixpoint computation
Conditional sensitivityUsing branch conditions to refine values

Lattice Structure

        ⊤ (NAC - Not A Constant)
       / | \
      1  2  3  ... (specific constants)
       \ | /
        ⊥ (UNDEF - Undefined)

Tips

  • Use join (∩) at control flow merge points
  • Handle conservatively: unknown = NAC (not a constant)
  • Consider arrays and pointers as killing definitions
  • Combine with copy propagation for better results
  • SSA form simplifies the analysis significantly

Implementation

from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import Dict, Set, Optional
from enum import Enum

class ConstValue(Enum):
    UNDEF = 0   # Bottom: undefined
    NAC = 1     # Top: not a constant
    
@dataclass
class ConstantProp:
    lattice: Dict[str, any]  # var -> const value or UNDEF/NAC
    
    def transfer_assign(self, var: str, expr):
        if self.is_constant_expr(expr):
            self.lattice[var] = self.eval_const(expr)
        else:
            self.lattice[var] = ConstValue.NAC
    
    def join(self, v1, v2):
        if v1 == v2:
            return v1
        if v1 == ConstValue.UNDEF:
            return v2
        if v2 == ConstValue.UNDEF:
            return v1
        return ConstValue.NAC  # Different constants

Related Skills

  • common-subexpression-eliminator - CSE optimization
  • dead-code-eliminator - Remove dead code after constant prop
  • dataflow-analysis-framework - General dataflow infrastructure
  • ssa-constructor - SSA form enables sparse constant propagation

Canonical References

ReferenceWhy It Matters
Wegman & Zadeck, "Constant Propagation with Conditional Branches" (TOPLAS 1991)Foundational sparse conditional constant propagation algorithm
Cytron et al., "Efficiently Computing Static Single Assignment Form" (TOPLAS 1991)SSA construction enables efficient constant propagation
Kildall, "A Unified Approach to Global Program Optimization" (POPL 1973)Original dataflow framework

Research Tools & Artifacts

Compiler optimization tools:

ToolWhat to Learn
LLVM SCCPSparse conditional constant propagation pass
GCC SSA-CCPGCC's constant propagation implementation

Tradeoffs and Limitations

Algorithm Tradeoffs

ApproachPrecisionComplexityUse Case
Simple CPLowO(n)Quick pass
Conditional CPMediumO(n²)Most compilers
Sparse CP (SSA)MediumO(n)Modern compilers
SCCPHighO(n)Optimizing compilers

When NOT to Use

  • Interprocedural: Need context-sensitive analysis
  • Pointers/aliasing: May need pointer analysis first
  • Array elements: Conservative handling required

Implementation Pitfalls

PitfallReal ConsequenceSolution
Wrong joinImprecision or wrong resultsUse correct lattice operations
Uninitialized varsFalse constantsTrack UNDEF properly
AliasingWrong constant valuesConservative on pointers
LoopsNon-terminationUse worklist with widening

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.