constant-propagation-pass
Skill17 starsChanged 9 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Implements constant propagation optimization. Use when: (1) Building
In this repository98 other files it gives its agents.
- abstract-interpretation-engineSkill
- abstract-machineSkill
- acsl-annotation-assistantSkill
- actor-model-implementerSkill
- algebraic-effectsSkill
- alias-and-points-to-analysisSkill
- axiomatic-semanticsSkill
- bidirectional-type-checkingSkill
- bisimulation-checkerSkill
- capability-systemSkill
- closure-converterSkill
- common-subexpression-eliminatorSkill
- concurrency-verifierSkill
- contextual-equivalenceSkill
- control-flow-analysisSkill
- coq-proof-assistantSkill
- cps-transformerSkill
- dafny-verifierSkill
- dataflow-analysis-frameworkSkill
- dead-code-eliminatorSkill
- defunctionalizationSkill
- denotational-semantics-builderSkill
- dependent-type-implementerSkill
- dsl-embeddingSkill
- effect-handlers-implementerSkill
- effect-systemSkill
- effect-type-systemSkill
- escape-analysisSkill
- existential-typesSkill
- ffi-designerSkill
- fuzzer-generatorSkill
- gadt-implementerSkill
- garbage-collector-implementerSkill
- graalvm-truffle-implementerSkill
- gradual-typing-implementerSkill
- higher-order-abstract-syntaxSkill
- hoare-logic-verifierSkill
- incremental-computationSkill
- information-flow-analyzerSkill
- inline-expanderSkill
- interprocedural-analysisSkill
- invariant-generatorSkill
- jit-compiler-builderSkill
- lambda-calculus-interpreterSkill
- language-server-protocolSkill
- lean-proverSkill
- lexer-generatorSkill
- linear-type-implementerSkill
- liveness-analysisSkill
- llvm-backend-generatorSkill
- lock-free-data-structureSkill
- loop-optimizerSkill
- loop-termination-proverSkill
- macro-expanderSkill
- memory-allocatorSkill
- message-passing-systemSkill
- mlir-dialect-designerSkill
- model-checkerSkill
- module-systemSkill
- monad-transformerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 59
Use join (∩) at control flow merge points
- Distinctive: line 61
Consider arrays and pointers as killing definitions
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Constant Propagation Pass
Implements dataflow constant propagation optimization.
When to Use
- Building compilers
- Learning program analysis
- Implementing optimizations
- Static program analysis
What This Skill Does
- Collects constants - Tracks known values through the program
- Propagates - Forward dataflow analysis with lattice operations
- Optimizes - Replaces variables/expressions with constant values
- Handles conditionals - Uses conditional branches to refine analysis
Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
| Lattice | Partial order: ⊥ (uninitialized) < constants < ⊤ (unknown/NAC) |
| Transfer function | How statements transform lattice values |
| Join | Lattice meet at control flow merge points (∩ for constants) |
| Worklist algorithm | Iterative fixpoint computation |
| Conditional sensitivity | Using branch conditions to refine values |
Lattice Structure
⊤ (NAC - Not A Constant)
/ | \
1 2 3 ... (specific constants)
\ | /
⊥ (UNDEF - Undefined)Tips
- Use join (∩) at control flow merge points
- Handle conservatively: unknown = NAC (not a constant)
- Consider arrays and pointers as killing definitions
- Combine with copy propagation for better results
- SSA form simplifies the analysis significantly
Implementation
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import Dict, Set, Optional
from enum import Enum
class ConstValue(Enum):
UNDEF = 0 # Bottom: undefined
NAC = 1 # Top: not a constant
@dataclass
class ConstantProp:
lattice: Dict[str, any] # var -> const value or UNDEF/NAC
def transfer_assign(self, var: str, expr):
if self.is_constant_expr(expr):
self.lattice[var] = self.eval_const(expr)
else:
self.lattice[var] = ConstValue.NAC
def join(self, v1, v2):
if v1 == v2:
return v1
if v1 == ConstValue.UNDEF:
return v2
if v2 == ConstValue.UNDEF:
return v1
return ConstValue.NAC # Different constantsRelated Skills
common-subexpression-eliminator- CSE optimizationdead-code-eliminator- Remove dead code after constant propdataflow-analysis-framework- General dataflow infrastructuressa-constructor- SSA form enables sparse constant propagation
Canonical References
| Reference | Why It Matters |
| Wegman & Zadeck, "Constant Propagation with Conditional Branches" (TOPLAS 1991) | Foundational sparse conditional constant propagation algorithm |
| Cytron et al., "Efficiently Computing Static Single Assignment Form" (TOPLAS 1991) | SSA construction enables efficient constant propagation |
| Kildall, "A Unified Approach to Global Program Optimization" (POPL 1973) | Original dataflow framework |
Research Tools & Artifacts
Compiler optimization tools:
| Tool | What to Learn |
| LLVM SCCP | Sparse conditional constant propagation pass |
| GCC SSA-CCP | GCC's constant propagation implementation |
Tradeoffs and Limitations
Algorithm Tradeoffs
| Approach | Precision | Complexity | Use Case |
| Simple CP | Low | O(n) | Quick pass |
| Conditional CP | Medium | O(n²) | Most compilers |
| Sparse CP (SSA) | Medium | O(n) | Modern compilers |
| SCCP | High | O(n) | Optimizing compilers |
When NOT to Use
- Interprocedural: Need context-sensitive analysis
- Pointers/aliasing: May need pointer analysis first
- Array elements: Conservative handling required
Implementation Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Real Consequence | Solution |
| Wrong join | Imprecision or wrong results | Use correct lattice operations |
| Uninitialized vars | False constants | Track UNDEF properly |
| Aliasing | Wrong constant values | Conservative on pointers |
| Loops | Non-termination | Use worklist with widening |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

